SEC Filing - CervoMed

View:

Download DOC

Download PDF

Download XLS

a6827065.htm

As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 12, 2011

File No. 333-___________

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM S-1

REGISTRATION STATEMENT

UNDER

THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933

Stratus Media Group, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Nevada

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

7900

(Primary Standard Industrial

Classification Code Number)

86-0776876

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

3 East De La Guerra Street

Santa Barbara, California 93101

(805) 884-9977

(Address, including zip code and telephone

number, including area code, of registrant’s

principal executive offices)

Paul H. Feller

Stratus Media Group, Inc.

3 East De La Guerra Street

Santa Barbara, California 93101

(805) 884-9977

(Name, address, including zip code and telephone

number, including area code, of agent for service)

Copies to:

David L. Ficksman

TroyGould PC

1801 Century Park East, Suite 1600

Los Angeles, California 90067

Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to public: From time to time after the effective date of this registration statement, as shall be determined by the selling stockholders identified herein.

If any of the securities being registered on this form are to be offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933, check the following box: þ

If this form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, please check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering: o

If this form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering: o

If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering: o

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (Check one):

Large accelerated filer o

Accelerated filer o

Non-accelerated filer o

(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Smaller reporting

company þ

CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE
Title of each class of securities to be registered	Amount to be Registered(1)		Proposed Maximum Offering Price Per Security(2)		Proposed Maximum Aggregate Offering Price		Amount of Registration Fee
Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share underlying preferred stock		21,750,000	$	0.51	$	11,092,500	$	1,287.84
Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share underlying warrants		37,225,000	$	0.51	$	18,984,750	$	2,204.13
Total		58,975,000			$	30,077,250	$	3,491.97

(1)	In the event of a stock split, reverse stock split, stock dividend or similar transaction involving our common stock, the number of shares registered shall automatically be adjusted to cover the additional shares of stock issuable pursuant to Rule 416 under the Securities Act.

(2)	Estimated solely for purposes of calculating the registration fee in accordance with Rule 457(c) under the Securities Act, using the average of the high and low prices as reported on the Over the Counter Bulletin Board on August 8, 2011, which was $0.51 per share.

The Registrant hereby amends this Registration Statement on such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective date until the Registrant shall file a further amendment which specifically states that this Registration Statement shall thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 or until the Registration Statement shall become effective on such date as the Commission, acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), may determine.

The information contained in this prospectus is not complete and may be changed. The selling securityholders named in this prospectus may not sell these securities until the registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is effective. This prospectus is not an offer to sell securities, and the selling securityholder is not soliciting offers to buy these securities, in any state where the offer or sale is not permitted.

PRELIMINARY PROSPECTUS

Subject to Completion. Dated August 12, 2011

Stratus Media Group, Inc.

58,975,000 Shares of Common Stock

This prospectus relates to the resale of up to 21,750,000 shares of our common stock issuable upon the conversion of shares of our Series E Preferred Stock and 37,225,000 shares of our common stock issuable upon the exercise of warrants held by some of our securityholders named in this prospectus. These shares of preferred stock and warrants were issued to the selling securityholders in connection with a private placement that we completed in May 24, 2011. In the private placement, the Company sold to eight accredited investors an aggregate of 8,700 Series E Preferred shares, A Warrants to purchase an aggregate of 21,750,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock and B Warrants to purchase an aggregate of 10,875,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock. The Company received gross proceeds of $8,700,000. The Company paid $800,000 in commissions and agreed to issue warrants to the placement agent to purchase an aggregate of 3,600,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock with respect to the private placement. The Company also paid a broker-dealer a commission in connection with the private placement of $100,000 in cash and agreed to issue such broker-dealer five year warrants to purchase 1,000,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock, at an exercise price of $0.70 per share. The Company agreed to provide “piggyback” registration rights with respect to shares of the Company’s Common Stock acquired by such broker-dealer upon exercise of the warrants. We are not selling any shares of common stock in this offering and therefore will not receive any proceeds from this offering. We will, however, receive the exercise price of the warrants if and when these warrants are exercised by the selling securityholders. We will pay the expenses of registering these shares.

Our common stock is traded in the over-the-counter market and is quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board under the symbol SMDI. On August 8, 2011, the last reported price of our common stock was $0.51 per share.

The shares included in this prospectus may be reoffered and resold directly by the selling securityholders in accordance with one or more of the methods described in the “Plan of Distribution,” which begins on page 46 of this prospectus. We will not control or determine the price at which the selling securityholders decide to sell their shares. Brokers or dealers effecting transactions in these shares should confirm that the shares are registered under applicable state law or that an exemption from registration is available.

You should understand the risks associated with investing in our common stock. Before making an investment, read the “Risk Factors,” which begin on page 3 of this prospectus.

Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities commission has approved or disapproved of these securities or passed upon the adequacy or accuracy of this prospectus. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.

The date of this prospectus is _________, 2011

TABLE OF CONTENTS

	Page

PROSPECTUS SUMMARY	2
RISK FACTORS	3
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS	8
USE OF PROCEEDS	9
BUSINESS	9
MARKET PRICE OF AND DIVIDENDS ON COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS	21
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS	23
DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, PROMOTERS AND CONTROL PERSONS	35
SELLING SECURITYHOLDERS	44
PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION	46
DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES	48
DISCLOSURE OF SEC POSITION ON INDEMNIFICATION FOR SECURITIES ACT LIABILITIES	52
LEGAL MATTERS	52
EXPERTS	52
WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION	53
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS	F-1

You should rely only on the information contained in this prospectus. We have not authorized anyone to provide you with information different from that which is contained in this prospectus. This prospectus may be used only where it is legal to sell these securities. The information in this prospectus may only be accurate on the date of this prospectus, regardless of the time of delivery of this prospectus or of any sale of securities.

PROSPECTUS SUMMARY

This summary highlights information contained elsewhere in this prospectus; it does not contain all of the information you should consider before investing in our common stock. You should read the entire prospectus before making an investment decision.

Throughout this prospectus, the terms “we,” “us,” “our,” and “our company” refer to Stratus Media Group. Inc.

Overview

We are an owner, operator and marketer of live sports and entertainment events. We intend to operate some or all of our currently-owned event properties and, depending on the amount of additional capital we have available, to aggregate and operate a large number of complementary live sports and entertainment events across North America and internationally. We also plan to operate Stratus Rewards which is an invitation only, affluent lifestyle membership club combined with an ultra-premium credit card rewards program.

Our business plan is to operate the Stratus Rewards program and to own all available event revenue rights from tickets/admissions, corporate sponsorship, television, print, radio, internet, merchandising, and hospitality. The objective of management is to build a profitable business by building corporate infrastructure, increasing organic growth, and, with sufficient capital, acquiring strategic companies and events. The plan is to leverage operational efficiencies across an expanded portfolio of events to reduce costs and increase revenues. We intend to promote the Stratus Rewards card and our events together, obtaining maximum cross marketing benefit among card members, corporate sponsors and Stratus events.

We believe we can build a profitable business by leveraging operational efficiencies across an expanded portfolio of events while at the same time increasing revenues from ticket, corporate sponsorships, media broadcast fees, merchandise sales and talent management fees. Our business plan depends on the raising of sufficient capital and no assurance can be given as to our ability to raise sufficient capital or the terms thereof.

Company History

On March 14, 2008, pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as August 20, 2007 between Feris International, Inc. and Pro Sports & Entertainment, Inc. (“PSEI”), Feris issued 49,500,000 shares of its common stock for all of the issued and outstanding shares of PSEI, resulting in PSEI becoming a wholly-owned subsidiary of Feris and the surviving entity for accounting purposes. In July 2008, Feris’ corporate name was changed to Stratus Media Group, Inc. PSEI, a California corporation, was organized on November 23, 1998 and specializes in sports and entertainment events that it owns, operates, manages, markets and sells in national markets. PSEI acquired the business of Stratus Rewards, LLC in August 2005 and Stratus Rewards is a wholly owned subsidiary of PSEI.

Our principal executive offices are located at 3 E. De La Guerra St., Santa Barbara, California 93101, and our telephone number at that address is (805) 884-9977.

The Offering

This offering involves 58,975,000 shares of our common stock issuable to the selling securityholders consisting of 21,750,000 shares of our common stock issuable upon conversion of our Series E Preferred Stock, and 37,225,000 shares of our common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants to purchase shares of our common stock that we issued to in a private placement.

Common stock offered by the selling securityholders	58,975,000 (1)
Common stock currently outstanding	77,505,077 (2)
Common stock to be outstanding after the offering, assuming no exercise of the warrants for the shares covered by this prospectus	99,255,077 (2)
Common stock to be outstanding after the offering, assuming the exercise of all warrants for the shares covered by this prospectus	136,480,077 (1)(2)
OTC Bulletin Board Trading Symbol	SMDI
Risk Factors	An investment in our common stock involves significant risks. See “Risk Factors” beginning on page 3.

(1)	Includes 21,750,000 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of Series E Preferred Stock and exercise of outstanding warrants to purchase 37,225,000 shares of common stock (with an exercise price ranging from $0.65 to $1.00 per share).

(2)

Does not include 9,622,895 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of outstanding options (with exercise prices ranging from $0.14 to $3.50 per share), 17,097,611 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of outstanding warrants (with exercise prices ranging from $0.65 to $2.00) or 7,847,295 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion and for certain share adjustments for Series C and D Preferred Stock.

RISK FACTORS

An investment in our securities involves a high degree of risk. You should carefully consider the risks described below before deciding to invest in or maintain your investment in our company. The risks described below are not intended to be an all-inclusive list of all of the potential risks relating to an investment in our securities. If any of the following or other risks actually occur, our business, financial condition or operating results and the trading price or value of our securities could be materially adversely affected.

Risks Related To Our Business

Our company is in early stages of development, which increases the risk of investments in our common stock

We are currently in the early stages of development, and we are in the process of bringing our staffing, infrastructure and marketing programs to an operational level. We have secured funding to pay liabilities, reestablish operations, establish the business concept within current markets and to extend our business into new revenue generating markets through acquisitions. However, there can be no assurance that we will be able to successfully be able to do so.

We have incurred substantial losses, are in the process of establishing business operations, and have received a “going concern” qualification from our auditors, which indicates that there are substantial risks in our establishing profitable operations and that we will need capital to continue as a going concern.

As noted in the opinion of our independent financial auditors, “The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming we will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 2 to the financial statements, we have suffered recurring losses and has negative cash flow from operations. This raises substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.” We had net losses for 2010 and 2009 of $8,409,605 and $3,401,098, respectively. As of December 31, 2010, we had negative working capital of $4,317,164 and cumulative losses of $26,483,387. We believe our recent financings coupled with future positive cash flow from operations may result in the future removal of the going concern qualification of the audit opinion similar to the one rendered by our independent auditors for the year ended December 31. 2010, although there can be no assurance that such removal of the going concern qualification will occur.

During 2011, we obtained capital and are initiating the operation of events and the Stratus Rewards program. However, until such time as operations are established with positive cash flows, there can be no assurance that we will not require additional capital to continue as a going concern.

The implementation of our business plan will require additional financing. Additional funds will be required to complete acquisitions and integrate them into the Company. Based on market conditions at the time, we may be unable to obtain sufficient additional financing on favorable terms, or at all. If we raise additional funds by selling our equity securities, the relative ownership of our existing investors will be diluted or the new investors could obtain terms more favorable than those of our existing investors. If we raise additional funds through debt financing, we could incur significant borrowing costs as well as face the possibility of our default if we are unable to repay the financing. If we cannot obtain sufficient financing, we may have to delay, reduce or eliminate our acquisition, marketing and promotion campaigns, which could significantly limit our revenues.

Intangible assets comprise most of our assets and are subject to impairment charges that will increase our losses. Such losses could have a negative impact on the price of our common stock.

As of March 31, 2011, the total of our intangible assets and goodwill was $3,317,680, or 61% of our total assets of $5,448,722. These intangible assets and goodwill are evaluated on an annual basis for impairment of the balance sheet value due to active or dormant status, competitive conditions, changes in our plans, and other factors that we determine are highly likely to reduce the ability of these assets to generate cash in the future. As of December 31, 2010, we determined that the $450,000 of value assigned to Stratus Rewards as Corporate Membership was no longer available to us and that $100,000 of value assigned to Stratus Rewards proprietary software had been impaired given the availability of commercial software with similar or better functionality. In addition, we took an impairment charge against the value of the Maui Music Festival of $100,000. Accordingly, we took total impairment charges of $650,000 as of December 31, 2010.

In 2009, impairment charges were $640,805, which was 19% of the total loss of $3,401,098 and in 2008, impairment charges were $1,015,000, which was 49% of the total loss of $2,093,267. Additional impairment charges could be required in the future, which would increase losses and reduce our asset base accordingly and which could have an adverse impact on the price of our common stock.

Our strategy includes plans for expansion by acquisition, which will require additional capital.

While we have identified several promising acquisition targets and while we expect to be able to secure financing and complete these acquisitions, there can be no assurances that we will be able to do so, or will choose to do so. While we intend that the value added by acquisitions will more than offset the dilution created by the issuance of shares for acquisitions, there can be no assurance that this offset will occur. Additional financing for future acquisitions may be unavailable and, depending on the terms of the proposed acquisitions, financings may be restricted by the terms of credit agreements and privately placed debt securities contained in the financing. Any debt financing would require payments of principal and interest and would adversely impact our cash flow. Furthermore, future acquisitions may result in charges to operations relating to losses related to the acquired events, interest expense, or the write down of goodwill, thereby increasing our losses or reducing or eliminating our earnings, if any.

Our strategy of expansion by acquisitions has inherent risks.

Although management believes that pursuing our acquisition strategy is in our best interests, such strategy involves substantial expenditures and risks on our part. There can be no assurance that acquisitions will be completed successfully or, if completed, will yield the expected benefits to us, or will not materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations. There can be no assurance that the value attributed by the market to acquisitions will offset the dilution created by the issuance of additional shares. Furthermore, consummation of the intended acquisitions could result in charges to operations relating to losses from the acquired events, interest expense, or the write down of goodwill, which would increase our losses or reduce or eliminate its earnings, if any. As a result of the foregoing, there can be no assurance as to when the intended acquisitions will be consummated or that they will be consummated. Furthermore, the results of the intended acquisitions may fail to conform to the assumptions of management. Therefore, in analyzing the information contained in this document, stockholders should consider that the intended acquisitions may not be consummated at all.

While acquisition agreements generally provide for indemnification from the seller for a limited period of time with respect to certain matters, some sellers may not be willing to provide indemnification, or may limit the scope of indemnification or that other material matters not identified in the due diligence process will subsequently be identified or that matters heretofore identified will prove to be more significant than currently expected and it is possible that the provider of the indemnification may be unwilling or unable to provide such indemnification. Future acquisitions by us could result in (a) potentially dilutive issuances of equity securities, (b) the incurrence of substantial additional indebtedness and/or (c) incurrence of expenses for interest, operating losses and the write down of goodwill and other intangible assets, any or all of which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. Acquisitions involve numerous risks, including difficulties in the assimilation of the operations, technologies, services and products of the acquired companies and the diversion of management’s attention from other business concerns. In the event that such acquisitions were to occur, there can be no assurance that our business, financial condition and results of operations would not be materially and adversely affected.

Our events have not been run continuously on an annual basis since 2004 and need to be reestablished.

In 2004, we realized $2,554,600 of revenues from events. There were no revenues from events in 2006, the total revenues from events in 2005, 2007 and 2008 were $252,741, which were derived from smaller-scale, standalone events rather than recurring annual events of a larger scale anticipated in our business plan, and there were no revenues in 2009. During 2010, we conducted the Santa Barbara Concours d’ Elegance on a limited basis and realized revenues of $40,189 and there were no event revenues in the three months ended March 31, 2011. We intend to reestablish some or all of those events to afford economies of scale in operations. While we believe that the nature of the event business allows for events to be readily reestablished and that it has the experience and management expertise to re-establish those events, there can be no assurance that such events will be successfully reestablished. We believe that we have full ownership of these events and related intellectual property, but there can be no assurance that unknown or unforeseen claims will not arise after successful reestablishment of such events.

Our credit card marketing operations, inactive since October 2007, are planned to be reestablished in 2011.

From 2005 to 2007, we operated the Stratus Rewards Visa card on a limited basis and realized revenues of approximately $700,000 during this time. These operations became inactive in October 2007. In May 2010, we signed a Co-branded Credit Card Agreement with Cornèr Bank, a private Swiss bank headquartered in Lugano, Switzerland, to issue the Stratus Rewards Visa White Card throughout Europe. Cornèr Bank is a founding member bank of VISA and controls 20% of the Board of Visa Europe. The Company is developing its concierge service, privilege program, e-commerce platform and marketing strategy for a planned launch in the fall of 2011. Card member services will be performed by us and outside vendors. Key support vendors have been identified and contractual negotiations are in process. While we believe that these negotiations will be successful and contractual relationships will be established, there can be no assurance that relationships will be established.

Our company depends on its key executive officers.

We depend on our key executives, including Paul Feller, our Chairman and CEO, William Kelly, our Chief Operating Officer, John Moynahan, our Chief Financial Officer, Charles Bearchell, our Chief Accounting Officer, and Paul Sewell, our Senior Vice President of Global Marketing. We do not have key-person life insurance policies on any of our executives. To achieve our business objectives, we must hire additional personnel to fill key managerial positions and provide them with compensation packages sufficient to retain their services. Our future success will depend upon the ability of our executive officers to establish clear lines of responsibility and authority, to work effectively as a team and to gain the trust and confidence of our employees. The loss of the services of a key employee could seriously impair our ability to operate and improve our events portfolio, which could reduce our revenues. We must also identify, attract, train, motivate and retain other highly skilled, technical, managerial, merchandising, engineering, accounting, marketing and customer service personnel.

Live entertainment events are largely cash based and are conducted in remote locations.

Live-entertainment events are conducted in numerous locations and often involve significant cash collections for tickets, concessions, merchandise, etc. We have developed and will continue to develop controls and procedures to control cash, to monitor cash proceeds, and to ensure that it is collected and deposited properly. However, there can be no assurance that all cash proceeds at an event will be deposited properly into our accounts.

We have not paid dividends on our stock, nor do we plan to do so for the foreseeable future.

At the present time, we intend to reinvest any cash generated from operations into expansion of operations and do not intend to pay dividends. We will periodically evaluate the best means to bring value to shareholders and such evaluations could result in a continuation of this policy. Investors should look to the growth in value as the primary means of realizing a return on their investment and should not look to dividends for a return. There can be no assurance that our proposed operations will result in sufficient revenues to enable us to operate at profitable levels or to generate positive cash flow. Any delay in the successful execution of our operations of or the acquisition and marketing strategies could delay the payment of dividends for an undetermined amount of time.

RISKS RELATING TO OUR MARKETS

The success of our events requires the availability of suitable athletes, artists and locations.

Our ability to sell tickets (including subscriptions) is highly dependent on the availability of popular athletes, artists and events. There can be no assurance that popular athletes, artists and events will be available to us in the future, or will be available on terms acceptable to us. The lack of availability of these artists and productions could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations and financial condition. Because we will operate live entertainment events under leasing or booking agreements with venues, our long-term success will depend upon our ability to renew these agreements upon their expiration or termination. There can be no assurance that we will be able to renew these agreements on acceptable terms or at all, or that we will be able to obtain attractive agreements with substitute venues.

Our industry is very competitive and most of our competitors are substantially larger than us and may have better access to capital needed to successfully run events.

Competition in the live entertainment industry is intense, and competition is fragmented among a wide variety of entities. In addition, television, movies, Internet and other non-live events compete for the time and attention for potential attendees for live events. We intend to compete on a local, regional and national basis with large venue owners and entertainment promoters for the hosting, booking, promoting and producing of live entertainment events. Moreover, our marketing operations will compete with advertising agencies and other marketing organizations. We will compete not only with other live entertainment events, including sporting events and theatrical presentations, but also with non-live forms of entertainment, such as television, radio and motion pictures. Our competitors generally have substantially greater resources than us. Certain of our competitors may also have greater operating and financial flexibility than us. In addition, many of these competitors have long standing relationships with performers, producers, and promoters and may offer other services that are not provided by us. There can be no assurance that we will be able to compete successfully in this market or against these competitors.

Our events business is dependent on obtaining local and/or private permits to conduct the events and our Stratus Rewards business operates in a highly-regulated environment.

The ability to conduct live entertainment events is subject to extensive local, state and federal governmental licensing, approval and permit requirements, including, among other things, approvals of state and local land-use and environmental authorities, building permits, zoning permits and liquor licenses. Significant acquisitions may also be subject to the requirements of the Hart-Scott-Rodino Act or other antitrust laws or regulations. Other types of licenses, approvals and permits from governmental or quasi-governmental agencies may also be required for other opportunities that we may pursue in the future, although we have no agreements or understandings with respect to these opportunities at this time. In addition, the Stratus credit card operates in a highly regulated and controlled market. We have used, and intend to use a large, established commercial bank to run our credit card processing and payments, but there can be no assurance that we may not be subject to current or future rules or regulations that could adversely affect our ability to operate the Stratus card in the manner intended or to achieve the results expected. There can be no assurance that we will be able to obtain the licenses, approvals and permits we may require from time to time in order to operate our business.

RISKS RELATING TO OUR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

Our proprietary rights may not adequately protect our ability to operate events and the credit card operations.

We have purchased a number of events and the Stratus Rewards business and intend to acquire other events as well. When an event is purchased, we acquire certain naming, venue and other intellectual property rights that are needed to conduct these events and card operations and prevent other parties from infringing on these events. While we do an extensive check to verify these rights, there can be no assurance that such intellectual property rights will be sufficient to allow us to conduct such events.

Third parties may claim that we infringe their intellectual property, and we could suffer significant litigation or licensing expense as a result.

If intellectual property rights relating to past or future acquisitions are challenged by third parties, we could incur significant costs to defend such rights and/or we could be required to pay license fees to such third parties if they were to prevail in a legal challenge to such intellectual property rights.

RISKS RELATING TO OUR COMMON STOCK

The price of our common stock has fluctuated in the past and the stock is thinly traded. If trading volume increases in the future, the fluctuations in price could be greater than those experienced in the past.

From November 3, 2008 to August 1, 2011, the average price of our common stock was $1.36 per share, with a low of $0.30 per share and a high of $2.57 per share, on an average trading volume per day of 26,108 shares. As noted below, it is possible that trading volumes could increase significantly and such increased volume could lead to significant fluctuations in the price of our stock.

We have a significant amount of stock that is eligible for resale under a Rule 144 exemption, and we have also sold stock that is, or will become within six months, eligible for resale under a Rule 144 exemption. Sales of such stock could depress the stock price significantly.

As of August 1, 2011 we had 77,505,077 shares of common stock outstanding, of which 6,065,294 are freely-trading and 60,046,178 were eligible for resale under Rule 144. Of such 60,046,178 shares, 26,416,341 shares are held by our Chairman and CEO that have significant limitations on resale and 9,405,000 are held by an affiliate with volume restrictions on resale, leaving 24,224,837 of these shares that are eligible for resale under Rule 144 with minimal restrictions.

Since the Company is the result of a “reverse merger,” certain of our shares can only be sold under an exemption from Rule 144(i), which pertains to shares issued by a company that executed a reverse merger. Under an exemption from Rule 144(i), the exemption may be granted to remove the restrictive legend on stock certificates only for a specified sale of securities and not as a “blanket” removal that removes the restrictive legend and allows for sale at unspecified dates in the future.

Additionally, upon effectiveness of the registration statement of which this prospectus is a part, the resale of its shares covered by the registration statement would make all such shares eligible for resale. If the selling securityholders sell a large number of shares of our common stock or the public market perceives that these sales may occur, the market price of our common stock could decline significantly. If significant amounts of such shares of stock eligible for resale were sold, such sales could result in significant declines in our stock price.

If we fail to continue to meet all applicable continued listing requirements of the Over The Counter Bulletin Board Market ("OTCBB") and our common stock is delisted from this market, the market liquidity and market price of our common stock could decline significantly.

Our common stock is listed on the OTCBB. Among other requirements to maintain such listing, we need to file our Quarterly Reports on Form 10Q and our Annual Report on Form 10K with the SEC in a timely manner. We did not file our Quarterly Reports on Form 10Q on time for the periods ended March 31, 2008 and June 30, 2008, but have filed on time from that point until the filing of the 2010 Annual Report on Form 10K, which was late. In the event that delisting occurs because these SEC reports are filed late, we will need to file all periodic SEC reports in a timely manner for one year and meet other applicable listing criteria before becoming eligible again for OTCBB listing.

In the event our common stock returns to the OTC Markets, the market for our common stock may be adversely affected and the market price for our common stock could decline significantly.

As of August 1, 2011, our Founder, Chairman and CEO, Paul Feller and co-Founder, Dr. Ralph Feller, collectively controlled approximately 46% of our outstanding common stock (prior to any option or warrant exercises).

As a result, these stockholders, if they act together, will be able to influence our management and affairs and all matters requiring stockholder approval, including the election of directors and approval of significant corporate transactions. Stockholders will have minimal influence over these actions. This concentration of ownership may have the effect of delaying or preventing a change in control of the Company and might adversely affect the market price of our common stock.

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This prospectus contains forward-looking statements, which reflect the views of our management with respect to future events and financial performance. These forward-looking statements are subject to a number of uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from such statements. Forward-looking statements are identified by words such as “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “expects,” “intends,” “plans,” “projects,” “targets” and similar expressions. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which are based on the information available to management at this time and which speak only as of this date. We undertake no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. For a discussion of some of the factors that may cause actual results to differ materially from those suggested by the forward-looking statements, please read carefully the information under “Risk Factors” beginning on page 3.

The identification in this document of factors that may affect future performance and the accuracy of forward-looking statements is meant to be illustrative and by no means exhaustive. All forward-looking statements should be evaluated with the understanding of their inherent uncertainty. You may rely only on the information contained in this prospectus.

We have not authorized anyone to provide information different from that contained in this prospectus. Neither the delivery of this prospectus nor the sale of common stock means that information contained in this prospectus is correct after the date of this prospectus. This prospectus is not an offer to sell or solicitation of an offer to buy these securities in any circumstances under which the offer or solicitation is unlawful.

USE OF PROCEEDS

We will not receive any proceeds from the sale of the common stock by the selling securityholders pursuant to this prospectus. All proceeds from the sale of the shares will be for the account of the selling securityholders. We will, however, receive the proceeds from the exercise for cash of the warrants held by the selling securityholders for the 37,225,000 shares underlying such warrants which are covered by this prospectus. If all of the warrants to purchase the 37,225,000 shares are exercised for cash at their current exercise prices of $0.65 and $1.00 per share, the total amount of proceeds that we would receive is approximately $28,000,000. We would expect to use the proceeds from the exercise of warrants, if any, for general working capital purposes. We will pay the expenses of registration of these shares, including legal and accounting fees.

BUSINESS

We are an owner, operator and marketer of live sports and entertainment events. We intend to operate some or all of our currently-owned event properties and, depending on the amount of additional capital available to us, to aggregate and operate a large number of complementary live sports and entertainment events across North America and internationally. We also operate Stratus Rewards which is an invitation only, affluent lifestyle membership club, with an ultra-premium credit card rewards program.

Our business plan is to operate the Stratus Rewards program and to own all available event revenue rights from tickets/admissions, corporate sponsorship, television, print, radio, internet protocol TV, video on demand, online applications, merchandising, and hospitality. With additional funding, the objective of management is to build a profitable business by implementing an aggressive acquisition growth plan to acquire quality companies, build corporate infrastructure, and increase organic growth. The plan is to leverage operational efficiencies across an expanded portfolio of events to reduce costs and increase revenues. We intend to promote the Stratus Rewards card and our events together, obtaining maximum cross marketing benefit among card members, corporate sponsors and Stratus events.

We believe that a favorable opportunity in the sports and live entertainment market currently exists in which consolidation of prestigious event properties with a long heritage are becoming available at favorable prices.

	Stratus Live Entertainment Division - A multi vertical event division which operates, markets, and sells rights and access to live entertainment events.

	Stratus Rewards Visa White Card - Stratus Rewards is an invitation only, affluent lifestyle membership club combined with an ultra premium credit card rewards program. Stratus Rewards provides members with bespoke luxury goods, exclusive event access, exceptional value purchasing opportunities at the world’s finest luxury and private travel brands, personalized concierge, and reciprocal privileges at private clubs.

We believe we can consolidate a large number of undervalued events into key verticals to create a global portfolio that can receive a much higher valuation than can be achieved by the events on their own. Toward that end, we have identified seven promising verticals:

1.	Redemption / Credit Card Marketing – Visa Credit Card Loyalty & E-Commerce Program
2.	Action Sports – Mixed Martial Arts (“MMA”), Ski, Surf, Skateboard, Rollerblade and Bicycling
3.	Motor Sports – Auto Shows, Road and Rally Racing Events,
4.	Concerts, Film & Music Festivals – Jazz Festivals, Music Festivals and Event Concerts
5.	College Sports – Football Bowl Games
6.	Food Entertainment – Local cuisine, Wine Auctions and Functions Combined with Live Entertainment
7.	Expos & Trade Shows

We are targeting event properties in each of these verticals and intend to add these acquisitions to our existing portfolio of event properties subject to the availability of capital. The goal is to create a critical mass of events, venues and companies that allow for numerous cross-event synergies, similar to the past strategy used by SFX Entertainment in the live entertainment industry that resulted in its large multi-channel advertising deal with multiple corporate partners. Specifically:

●	On the expense side, we believe we can share sales, financial and operations resources across multiple events, creating economies of scale, increasing our purchasing power, eliminating duplicate costs, and bringing standardized operating and financial procedures to all events, thus increasing the margins of all events.
●	On the revenue side, we believe we can offer national advertisers and corporate sponsors an exciting and diverse menu of programming that allows sponsors “one stop shopping” rather than having to deal with each event on its own, and in so doing, convert these sponsors into “strategic partners.”

With these core synergies operational, we intend to (1) expand our acquisition strategy into additional live sports and entertainment verticals, and (2) create new event properties on the forefront of the “experience economy” and thus tap into people’s lifestyle interests. In this way, we believe we can become a “one-stop shop” for premium-value program content and escalate its value to major advertisers and sponsors.

Future Development

Subject to the availability of capital, we expect to develop or acquire additional event properties into separate vertical organizations within our company.

Stratus Talent Management & Modeling Agency – in the past we have represented professional and retired athletes with non-exclusive agreements to represent appearances, corporate endorsements and player contracts. We intend to expand the business to include a modeling agency. Our talent representation activities are expected to consist of athletes, entertainers and model principally with representation in contract and endorsement negotiations.

Lifestyle – we intend to acquire or develop events focused on professional golf and tennis, among other lifestyle sports.

Consulting - we intend to form a consulting vertical to allow our internally-developed expertise in establishing and running events to be converted into revenues by providing consulting services for events and marketing.

Acquisition Strategy

Subject to the availability of capital, we see an opportunity now emerging to take a leading position in the live sports and entertainment industry by being a significant player to step in and “reconsolidate” a global complement of events, properties and companies. This strategy is expected to create a profitable business by creating economies of scale and aggressively developing new revenue sources.

Our management has reviewed the strengths and weaknesses of previous consolidation efforts launched by previous roll up strategies within the live entertainment industry. Having been involved with these consolidations at an executive level, some of our management team are familiar with the strategic thinking, actual negotiations and executions of these previous acquisitions. Accordingly our management has sought to (1) amplify the strong points that enabled SFX’s consolidation success, and (2) mitigate the risks and shortcomings that led to the subsequent re-fragmentation of the industry (as outlined in “Industry”).

To accomplish these goals, we established three critical criteria in targeting acquisitions, as follows:

1.	Target must be operating profitably or have a clear and short path to profitability.
2.	Target must add strategic synergies to existing portfolio of companies and events.
3.	Target when possible, must own 100% of revenue rights, including sponsorship, licensing, ticketing, merchandise, trademark, intellectual property and when appropriate television and radio broadcast.

Our acquisition/organic growth goals are to have a strong, branded presence in seven verticals with an international footprint.

Additional Opportunities

We may consider other opportunities in live sports and entertainment if they enable us to find synergies in sales of sponsorships and advertising; marketing the event to participants and/or attendees; actual event operations; merchandising, hospitality, and concessions agreements; and management of public relations, legal and financial matters. As well, there are synergistic opportunities in publishing and travel that can evolve from owning the leadership position in this industry.

We may also research and develop our own event properties when those properties are deemed to be organic, natural line extensions. Management believes that the convergence of content and media will continue and that the “winners” will be by companies that own and control content and possess the capability of creating original, sponsor-supported content. Thus, we may create our own network of event properties that deliver emotional, authentic, interactive “once-in-lifetime” type experiences for audiences of all kinds. In this way, we can further become a “one-stop shop” for premium-value program content and escalate its value to major advertisers and sponsors.

This synergistic approach looks to consolidate event properties and then craft individual large scale deals to allow companies to bundle advertising across diverse events. A similar approach was used by SFX Entertainment in the live entertainment industry, IPG in the advertising industry and Viacom in the broadcast industry.

For example, we intend to acquire additional music festivals, with the goal of combining them with our current music festival events with the objective of conducting one event per month. Targeted music festival events would be similar to: Utah Jazz Festival, Monterey Jazz Festival New Orleans Jazz Festival, and Cochella Music Festival. We also intend to establish music festival events in Santa Barbara, CA and Napa, CA to further expand the portfolio. With these music festival events in place, we can maximize performance synergies.

Through our acquisitions, we have and will continue to amass core competencies in the areas of promotion, operations, marketing, sales and distribution. This should afford us better negotiating leverage with cost centers such as advertising, marketing, venue and talent costs on a regional, national and international scale. In addition, we should be able to better leverage top end revenue by owning, operating and marketing multiple events within each vertical. This should create greater value for the advertisers by cross pollinating multiple verticals within our portfolio, offering other key demographic target markets to the client and creating greater value, more impression and a higher cost point for less risk.

We have acquired and built a portfolio of live entertainment events as a launching pad and plan to consolidate them into strategic similar event verticals within the Company and we are taking actions to begin operating them annually beginning in 2011. We have pursued our acquisition strategy, completing the acquisition of a number of companies and key events. We will provide integrated event management, television programming, marketing, talent representation and consulting services in the sports and other live entertainment industries. Our event management, television programming and marketing services may involve:

●	managing live entertainment events, such as car shows, vintage car road rallies, music festivals and fashion shows;
●	producing television programs, principally sports entertainment and live entertainment programs;
●	managing sporting events, such as Mixed Martial Arts, college bowl games, golf tournaments and auto racing teams and events; and
●	marketing athletes, models, entertainers and organizations.

OPERATIONS

CREDIT CARD MARKETING VERTICAL - STRATUS REWARDS VISA WHITE CARD

The Stratus Rewards VISA credit card and rewards system is a luxury lifestyle club that was created expressly to cater to the affluent lifestyle. Originally developed by professionals seeking meaningful rewards above and beyond those offered by existing credit card loyalty programs, Stratus Rewards now has the opportunity to gain significant market share of the international high net worth and ultra high net worth cardholder population. Recent service and program reductions by its primary competitor, the American Express Centurion Card, has resulted in dissatisfaction with the only internationally know payment card marketed to this population. As a Visa card, Stratus Rewards will be the only globally accepted payment card in this segment and could be the preferred payment choice for most merchants and service providers. The Program is currently being expanded to include a luxury e-commerce component that will encourage and increase member purchasing and significantly increase the value proposition for our partnerships with internationally know Tier 1 luxury brands. Designed for maximum scalability, Stratus Rewards is expected to be profitable on revenue from membership fees and partner commissions, even with a limited number of cardholders. Revenue from interchange (IF) and foreign exchange (FX) fees differ by geographic location of the issuing bank and are deposited in a separate redemption account, ensuring we will have sufficient cash to fund redemptions; as such, redemptions are not considered a cost item. Depending on the regulated amount of interchange allowed, IF & FX fees may also add significantly to net revenue. Expenses to run the program include a significant marketing budget, cost of goods sold, concierge/customer service support and fee share agreements with issuing banks. We plan to launch the card in the fourth calendar quarter of 2011.

In May 2010, we signed a Co-branded Credit Card Agreement with Cornèr Bank of Switzerland to issue the Stratus Rewards Visa White Card throughout Europe. We are actively seeking a new issuing bank for our United States Stratus Rewards program and are reviewing opportunities to co-brand with major regional banks in South America, Asia, Australia and the Middle East. It is a natural growth strategy for us to expand into the mass wealth card market to capture a greater share of the world’s affluent population.

ACTION SPORTS VERTICAL

PRO ELITE MMA

Our business plan is to capitalize on the popularity and growth of mixed martial arts by rebuilding a global brand, ProElite. MMA has seen substantial growth over the last several years as evidenced by its mainstream acceptance and increased PPV buys and interest by national media including ESPN, CBS Sportsline, 60 Minutes and Sports Illustrated. We plan on reaching MMA fans and participants through normal marketing channels (print, television, radio) and harnessing the efficient networking available over the Internet. We acquired multiple on- and off-line brands to increase our entertainment properties, content libraries and tool set offerings for fighters, fans and organizations in and around MMA.

Pro Elite has successfully run multiple events in CBS, Showtime and PPV. Pro Elite plans to run multiple events per year.

Pro Elite’s business model includes partnering with (and creating) the best distribution channels for the video content created by our live events and on-line products. The distribution channels may include network television, cable, pay per view, internet protocol TV, video on demand, online applications and other major web portals as well as additional television network and cable channels. Each live event may generate up to ten hours of MMA video footage. We have also finalized licensing deals for the right to hundreds of hours of MMA and other combat footage. This footage can be edited into videos or other formats that can be sold or used to market our fighters and future events.

CORE TOUR ACTION SPORTS

The action sports featured in the CORE Tour Action Sports and Concert Series includes bike competitions, inline skating, skateboarding vert ramp and freestyle motocross. Competitions take place on vert, dirt, street course, Winter Superpipe, Big Air - Snowboarding and Skiing, Big Mountain Snowboarding/Freeskiing, Gravity Quarterpipe and Freestyle Snowmobile.

Summer Series

The summer series of extreme sports events and concerts will visit multiple cities. In previous years, the festival had emerged as a premier competition in Freestyle Motorcross, In-Line, and Skateboard vert ramp competition. Add in music such as Jane’s Addiction and the audience size has substantially increased through major online viewership. For advertisers eager to reach this younger demographic, this is an ideal venue. Past advertisers and sponsors have included Team Mobil, Nokia, Panasonic, Paul Mitchell, Milk Advisory Board, BMX, Arrowhead, and Butterfinger.

Winter Series

FreeSkiing is the new snowboarding where competitors push halfpipe and slope style disciplines to new heights beyond snowboarding. Testing the limits of gravity, the leaders of skiing’s revolution are unafraid to huck themselves 18 feet out of a Superpipe or go off a 20 foot kicker backwards. The continual evolution of “twin tips” has put skiers front and center with their more famous snowboarding counterparts and they are pushing outside the envelope to uncharted territory. Snowboarding where competitors push halfpipe and slope style disciplines to new heights and beyond. Amateur and pro snowboarders push and defy gravity with extreme action for television and on site audiences.

MOTOR SPORTS VERTICAL

This vertical is comprised of auto shows, racing events and luxury lifestyle experiences which draw an affluent demographic, with the main revenues coming from sponsors, advertisers, and hospitality events. This portfolio of events is an effective cross-market with our sport lifestyle brands. Event specific costs include talent, rent, venue preparation costs, security and advertising and are generally fixed costs that vary based on the type of event and its location.

Mille Miglia® North America

The Mille Miglia North American Tribute, honoring the world-renowned Italian Mille Miglia road rally, is scheduled to begin Monday, October26, 2011 from Santa Barbara, California. This 1,000 mile event will feature an historic and scenic drive along a golden coast route— navigating around the Monterey Peninsula, and winding through Santa Barbara, Napa Valley, and San Francisco. This driving experience will include VIP events and a drive over the Golden Gate Bridge in San Francisco. This event will conclude on Wednesday, October 28th at the silver anniversary celebration of the Santa Barbara Concours d’Elegance. We acquired the license to own and operate the Mille Miglia Tribute event in North America in November 2010.

Mille Miglia SALUTES in North America

The Mille Miglia Salute is a 100+ mile driving experience produced in the spirit of the red arrow (the symbol of the original Italian Mille Miglia) and is scheduled to adjoin each Concours d’Elegance event taking place in Santa Barbara, Beverly Hills, Sunset Strip, Miami, Napa, Phoenix, Boston, New York, Chicago, Dallas, and Las Vegas.

Concours Italiano

The car show is expected to feature some of the best-known names in the Italian auto history. This event will showcase of the synergies that we seek to accomplish through consolidation of our events, as this event will share operational costs with its “sister” events and advertisers will be offered a broader package of sponsorship opportunities, effectively lowering costs and raising revenues. We anticipate conducting these events in our venues in Santa Barbara, Beverly Hills, Sunset Strip, Miami, Napa, Phoenix, Boston, New York, Chicago, Dallas, and Las Vegas.

Concours d’ Elegance

These events typically feature over 150 museum quality vintage automobiles from across the U.S. These events include live musical entertainment, food pavilions, and attendance by celebrities. We anticipate conducting these events in our venues in Santa Barbara, Beverly Hills, Sunset Strip, Miami, Napa, Phoenix, Boston, New York, Chicago, Dallas, and Las Vegas.

American Classics

These events feature some of the finest names in U.S. automobile history and typically attract thousands of guests. Automobiles include American classics, hot rods, special interest cars and the latest in American automobile design. We anticipate conducting these events in our venues in Santa Barbara, Beverly Hills, Sunset Strip, Miami, Napa, Phoenix, Boston, New York, Chicago, Dallas, and Las Vegas.

CONCERTS, MUSIC AND FILM FESTIVALS

Our concert and music festival business will consist primarily of our promotion of concerts and operation of musical events. The Company’s primary source of revenues will be from ticket sales, sponsorships, concessions, parking and other ancillary services.

Revenue from ticket sales will be affected primarily by the number of events we promote, the average ticket price and the number of tickets sold. The average ticket price depends on the popularity of the artist who we are promoting, the size and type of venue and the general economic conditions and consumer tastes in the market where the event is being held. Revenue and margins are also affected significantly by the type of contract entered into with the artist or the artist’s representative. The promoter or venue operator assumes the financial risk of ticket sales and is responsible for local production and advertising of the event. However, in certain instances, the promoter agrees to accept a fixed fee from the artist for its services, and the artist assumes all financial risk. When the promoter or venue operator assumes the financial risk, all revenue and expenses associated with the event are recorded. When the artist assumes the risk, only the fee is recorded. As a result, operating margins would be significantly greater for fee-based events as opposed to events for which we assume the risk of ticket sales, although profits per event would tend to be lower. Operating margins can vary from period to period.

Our most significant operating expenses will be talent fees, production costs, venue operating expenses (including rent), advertising costs and insurance expense. The booking of talent for concerts generally involves contracts for limited engagements, often involving a small number of performances. Talent fees will depend primarily on the popularity of the artist, the ticket price that the artist can command at a particular venue and the expected level of ticket sales. Production costs and venue operating expenses have substantial fixed cost components and lesser variable costs primarily related to expected attendance.

Maui Music Festival

In the past, this event has consistently drawn the top jazz and alternative rock performers to the Kaanapali and/or Wailea Maui shores, attracting 3,000 to 5,000 tourists and residents per day. A relaxed and vacation- like atmosphere makes the Festival a favorite among musicians and fans. This event is expanding to a multi-day format with expos, merchandising opportunities and new music genres including rhythm and blues and soft rock.

Maui Jazz Festival

This new event is expected to draw the top jazz performers and will be combined with the premier culinary chefs from Hawaii and the best wineries from around the globe. It takes place on the fairways adjacent to the Resorts in Maui. The festival is projected to attract 5,000 tourists and residents per day over a three-day period. A relaxed and vacation-like atmosphere makes the Festival a favorite among musicians and fans. This event has high upside potential because it has not had sponsors before or taken advantage of broadcast revenues.

Santa Barbara International Jazz Festival

The Festival is expected to attract jazz, Latin, and world music artists to a three-day event in Santa Barbara. Past performances by musical groups such as The Soul City Survivors, Dave Brubeck and Les McCann have played to average weekend audiences of 10,000 and have provided an ideal environment for targeted sponsorships. We intend to restore this event to its traditional high standards.

Napa Jazz Festival

The Napa Jazz Festival is expected to attract jazz, Latin, and world music artists to a five-day event in the vineyards. The Napa Jazz Festival is expected to combine music, valley food, wine and art.

Core Tour Concert Series

The Core Tour Concert Series is a multiple city tour that is expected to bring some of the best amateur acts, as well as some biggest name bands, to multiple cities across the USA. The Core Tour Concert Series follows the schedule of the Core Tour Action Sport Series and in the past has received an average attendance of 50,000 people per day.

Perugia International Film Festival

The Perugia International Film Festival is expected to be a unique opportunity to combine modern and historical art with Renaissance architecture in Perugia, Italy, a city near Rome that is noted for architecture and arts. The first annual Perugia International Film Festival is scheduled to take place in March 2012 with a prelaunch weekend event scheduled for October 1st and 2nd 2011 under Executive Director Karen Arikian, Executive Director of the Hamptons Film Festival, New York International Film Festival, and the International Director of ‘Berlinale’, Berlin European Film Festival and Market.. Along with international movie premieres, screenings, and discussion forums, the Perugia International film festival is expected to feature:

●	Movie Theaters: Teatro Morlacchi, Teatro Pavone, Sala Podiani, Sala dei Notari, Oratorio Santa Cecillia
●	Meetings: with actors/actresses, directors, and other professionals
●	Introduction: of new technologies into cinema production and distribution

We have entered into a 10-year agreement with the City of Perugia to conduct the Festival. The Festival is planned to combine technology and the arts through its relationship with two universities in the area.

COLLEGE SPORTS VERTICAL

We believe that college sporting events are a source of significant future revenues when such events are held in markets that are currently not represented in the current bowl system.

Seattle Bowl

We plan to apply for certification of the Seattle Bowl with the National Collegiate Athletic Association. Seattle is one of the few major metropolitan areas without a collegiate bowl game. We believe that the Seattle Bowl is potentially a venue for several of our other event properties, such as action sports, food and music festivals. Under other ownership, the Seattle Bowl initially operated in 2001 and 2002, was discontinued in 2003.

Freedom Bowl

Currently not operating since 1998, we acquired certain rights from Disney’s Orange County Sports Association, including broadcast, sponsorship, trademarks, merchandising, common law rights, etc. to the Freedom Bowl College Bowl Game and plan to apply for Re-Certification with the NCAA.

FOOD ENTERTAINMENT VERTICAL

Comprised of food exhibitions, wine tasting, music, art show and children events which tend to draw an affluent demographic, with the main revenues coming from sponsors, advertisers, and hospitality events.

Santa Barbara Vino d’Elegance Wine Festival

This event is scheduled in conjunction with the Santa Barbara Concours d ‘Elegance. Vin Villages made up of individual wine tasting booths and displays of high-end jewelry, art, and gourmet food are planned to compliment the cars on the field and provide gathering areas for attendees. The Vino d’Elegance is expected to provide local wineries a platform to reach a niche market of wine enthusiasts.

Taste of Napa

This weekend-long event is planned to feature international cuisine, local vineyards and entertainment in the center of Napa Valley.

Taste of Maui

The three-day food, wine and music festival is expected to feature cuisine from local restaurants, along with fine wines and entertainment.

TRADE SHOWS & EXPOS VERTICAL

Each of our event properties is planned to be paired with complementary “sister” events, such as trade shows and expos that are marketed to a wide array of vendors. For example, at the Santa Barbara Concours, we hold an outdoor expo with booths for corporate sponsors and product merchandisers to showcase their products before a targeted audience. Expos are another example of the economies of scale and revenue maximizing synergies that we expect to realize from centralized management and resource sharing.

Los Angeles Health & Fitness Expo

Previously operated at the Long Beach Convention Center, we intend to reactivate and move the expo to the Los Angeles Convention Center with the objective of improving its revenue potential.

Life Sports Expo

We intend to reactivate and move the expo to the Los Angeles Convention Center. The last 5-day expo enjoyed 20,000 attendees per day with 500 booths showcasing sports for life products including a boat show, mountain climbing, sports memorabilia, outdoor motor sports and cycling.

Seasonality

Our event operations and revenues are expected to be seasonal in nature, with generally higher revenue generated in the third and fourth quarters of the year. Outdoor venues will be primarily utilized in the summer months and do not generate substantial revenue in the late fall, winter and early spring. Similarly, the musical concerts that we plan to promote largely occur in the second and third quarters. To the extent that our entertainment marketing relates to musical concerts, they also predominantly generate revenues in the second and third quarters. Therefore, the seasonality of our business will likely probably continue to cause a significant variation in our quarterly operating results. These variations in demand could have a material adverse effect on the timing of our cash flows and, therefore, on its ability to service our obligations with respect to its indebtedness. However, we believe that this variation can be somewhat offset with the acquisition of events that are typically non-summer seasonal businesses.

Overview of the Live Entertainment Industry

We believe that the sports and entertainment business has annual revenues of over $400 billion in the U.S. and currently has thousands of event properties that are candidates for acquisition and consolidation. The industry is subject to recessionary pressures but has historically grown over time with greater numbers of fans, higher television ratings, and increased corporate sponsorships.

The sports marketing industry has been historically fragmented and we believe that local and regional entrepreneurs comprise the majority of the events within this industry. We believe that within this industry, we can target the following areas as potential sources of revenues:

●	Sponsorships - represents sponsorships of leagues, teams, broadcasts and events. Sponsorships revenues historically have produced high gross margins. Sports receive a majority of sponsorship dollars, with entertainment and festivals receiving smaller amounts.
●	Event Entrance & Spending - includes ticket sales, concessions, parking, on-site merchandise sales and premium seating revenue and endorsements from athletes and entertainers
●	Media Broadcast Rights - includes the four major professional leagues (football, baseball, basketball, hockey), NASCAR, college sports, cable and internet media

Competition

In the late 1990s several companies launched consolidation efforts and by 2000 there were three major companies -- Clear Channel Communications (Owner of SFX), Interpublic Group (Owner of Octagon and Magna Global Entertainment), and International Management Group (IMG). Subsequent to this consolidation, these companies (known as “the Big 3”) have divested significant portions of their live sports and entertainment holdings for several reasons:

1.	The capital markets have been demanding that the parent companies focus on core competencies.
2.	The companies faced capital shortfalls and viewed the sports units as easy divestments.
3.	The parent companies did not integrate the sports units.
4.	Management changes and a result change in strategy.
5.	Created potential conflicts between advertising division and event sales divisions.

We believe that our acquisition strategy can be more profitable than the strategies used by the “Big 3” in the past and our strategy is fundamentally different from the SFX model used years ago. SFX sought total vertical integration, from ownership of the venue to negotiating a player’s salary. This required SFX to manage the venues, which tend to run on low margins. Our sole focus is on owning the event content and talent rights that we believe can generate higher margins.

In addition to the remnants of the “Big 3” there are a number of additional sports marketing groups such as Anschutz Entertainment Group. One or more of these groups may be attempting acquisition strategies that are similar to ours, though we are unaware of any such efforts.

Although these groups are significantly larger than us, we believe that we can implement our strategy in our targeted verticals. Additionally, several of these companies are evaluating their strategic direction and may decide to sell parts of their sports portfolios, creating acquisition opportunities for us.

We also compete with a division of Live Nation. Live Nation Entertainment is one of the largest live entertainment and eCommerce companies in the world. Live Nation was spun off from Clear Channel in 2005, a division of Live Nation, Live Nation Concerts, produces and promotes upward of over 20,000 shows annually for more than 2,000 artists. Live Nation’s other major business units including ticketmaster.com and a management promotional group.

The majority of the remaining live sports and entertainment events are owned and operated by smaller organizations and individuals. This industry remains fragmented and we believe it is prime for consolidation.

Achieving Market Penetration

Historically, the majority of live sports and entertainment events have been regional and entrepreneurial in nature, owned by individuals, families, or charities. Many of these events have been profitable but we believe the value of these events have not been maximized from:

Not knowing how to monetize additional revenue sources.

Lack of access to working capital and limited resources.

Lack of size to draw the interest of major sponsors.

In our discussions with event owners, we believe that many would consider selling their ownership position for a combination of cash, stock and in some cases, a position running their event within a growing organization. In this way, the owners could “cash out” some of their efforts, maintain a personal income and status related to the event, and have a high potential upside from the stock holdings. We believe that many owners turned down the offers they received from companies who pursued past consolidation efforts, and are determined not to miss a similar opportunity again.

Maximizing Business Synergies

Key to our strategy is our expected ability to create synergies across the expense and revenue side of the business. On the expense side, there are a number of fixed costs of running an event and an event operator with only one property must bear the full brunt of all fixed cost items. We believe that we can manage a number of events at the same time and spread many of the fixed and variable costs across multiple events, effectively bringing down the cost of operations.

The same is true on the revenue side. Event owners are limited in their ability to negotiate premium sponsorships, maximize advertising opportunities, and increase average ticket prices and concession margins. We believe that development of an established infrastructure will enable the efficient maximization of each of these revenue sources, as well as the development of new revenue sources.

This synergistic approach seeks to consolidate event properties and then craft individual large scale deals to allow companies to bundle advertising across diverse events.

We intend to acquire multiple events within a specific strategic vertical, with the goal of maximizing performance synergies:

●

Rather than providing a sponsor with a single event, we believe we can provide multiple events that allow a sponsor to choose the venues and demographics they would like to sponsor/advertise to meet their objectives. Instead of having to deal with numerous promoters and middlemen, the sponsor would have a single point of contact to address their marketing and sponsorship requirements.

●

Similar leveraging of scale can be exerted on all revenue sources (broadcast fees; ticket sales; participant fees; program and venue advertising; booth rentals; hospitality fees; merchandise and concession sales; percentages of parking and hotel revenues; and athlete management fees).

●

While a single event must carry 100 percent of the annual costs for that event, we believe we can use one central infrastructure to manage that event as well as many more similar events. This would generate efficiences at all levels, from general and administrative costs to negotiating bulk-buying deals with vendors. Event costs vary by type of event, but generally include team or individual participation payments, venue leasing, merchandise expense, staff costs, advertising, ticket printing and distribution, program printing, signage, security, medical support, judges expenses, trophies and prizes, equipment and facility rentals, food and beverages, entertainment, press facilities, licenses and permits. We believe these costs can be reduced when spread across multiple events.

Exploiting an Emerging Trend

We believe that the proliferation of media and the rapid fragmentation of media audiences make it increasingly difficult for advertisers to reach the audience they seek, which allows us to take an intermediary role to connect advertisers and target audiences. In addition, this media proliferation has created a demand for content of the type that we believe our events can provide.

●	The increased use of the internet has resulted in reduced use of traditional media. Coupled with this trend is the ability of internet advertising to target audiences and customize that advertising to individual preferences.
●	The expansion in the number of cable and satellite channels and the increasing specialty focus of these channels has created a need for content tailored to these specialties.
●	Event sponsorship offers unique advantages that marketers cannot always get elsewhere, including the ability to (1) hone in on a niche audience without any waste, (2) obtain heightened visibility with few or no competitive messages, (3) be associated with a well-known or unique venue, (4) develop business-to-business relationships in a relaxed environment, and (5) showcase the attributes of its product or service.

Intellectual Property

We have has trademarked many of its currently owned events, and plan to trademark and copyright all new events and some of the remainder of our currently owned events.

Property

On May 1, 2009, we entered into a lease agreement for approximately 1,800 square feet of office space in Santa Barbara, California for use as our executive offices. This lease was amended on July 21, 2009 and expires on December 31, 2013 with a three-year renewal term available at an initial rent plus common area charges of $5,767 per month.

We believe our existing facilities are adequate for our current needs and suitable additional or substitute space will be available as needed to accommodate expansion of our operations.

Legal Proceedings

In February 2006, a former employee filed an action against PSEI and Paul Feller in Los Angeles Superior Court, alleging breach of employment contract. A jury trial concluded on July 28, 2010 with the jury finding in favor of us, PSEI, and Mr. Feller on all counts, except two counts as against PSEI only, requiring payment by PSEI to plaintiff of $22.104. The parties filed crossing motions for attorneys fees and costs, and the court ruled and entered a judgment as follows: (a) the Company and Mr. Feller shall recover from the former employee a total amount of $170,378; and (b) the former employee shall recover from PSEI, and PSEI only, a total amount of $51,015. The former employee has filed a notice of appeal of the judgment.

In connection with a consulting contract related to the acquisition of an event, the consultant obtained an arbitration award, by default, against PSEI in August 2005 for $65,316 in Los Angeles County Superior Court. In September 2005, the plaintiff filed a petition against the Company to confirm the Award against PSEI. In January 2006, the court entered a judgment on the Award and in October 2007, PSEI filed a motion to set aside the Judgment on the basis of lack of service. In November 2007, the court denied the motion to set aside the Judgment. PSEI recorded an expense of $65,316 in 2007 and has fully reserved this amount. Plaintiff has taken the debtor’s examination of Mr. Feller, which has been continued to October 19, 2011.

A former attorney for PSEI filed an action against PSEI in Los Angeles County Superior Court seeking to collect allegedly unpaid legal fees in September 2005. Plaintiff purported to effect service on PSEI by service on the California Secretary of State, and on its President by publication. Plaintiff obtained a default judgment in July 2006 for $30,416. On June 24, 2011, this matter was fully settled as follows: the plaintiff was paid $16,500 in exchange for a full satisfaction of the judgment, that is, all liabilities have been extinguished.

In July 2010, we were served with a summons by a shareholder, Jeffrey Mitchell, in the Superior Court of California, Santa Barbara County, alleging breach of fiduciary duty, breach of covenant of good faith and fair dealing and conversion. The summons is seeking a jury trial for declaratory relief of not less than $600,000 and injunctive relief. We believe that these claims are without merit and have filed a counterclaim against this shareholder.

In March 2011, four of our shareholders filed an action in Superior Court of California, in Santa Barbara County, (lead plaintiff is Howell Douglas Wood), against us, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer and its outside directors. The complaint alleges violations of the California Corporations Code and federal securities laws relating to the issuance of securities to the plaintiffs and breach of fiduciary duty, contract and covenant of good faith and fair dealing and conversion relating to the alleged refusal to allow the plaintiffs to sell their shares. The complaint seeks unspecified compensatory and punitive damages, recovery of attorney fees and costs and certain equitable relief. We believe that the claims are without merit and intend to defend the action. Also, the Company filed a motion to consolidate this matter with the above Mitchell matter, which the court granted, that is, these matters will be treated as one and the same.

In July 2010, Mark Hill, a shareholder of the Company served a demand for arbitration alleging that we refused to remove transfer restrictions on shares of our stock owned by him. The demand alleges that such refusal constituted breach of contract, implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing and conversion and seeks unspecified compensatory damages, injunctive relief and attorney fees and costs. The matter went to arbitration, but as a result of the Company’s attorney’s withdrawal from representation at the start of the arbitration, it went into a default, and the petitioner obtained and award for a total amount of $165,344. The Company intends to: (a) file a motion to vacate the award on the grounds that the arbitrator failed to grant a continuance of the arbitration to permit new counsel to take over the matter, and because the arbitration lacked jurisdiction in the first instance; and (b) if the court vacates the award, defend the matter vigorously.

MARKET PRICE OF AND DIVIDENDS ON COMMON EQUITY

AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

PRICE RANGE OF COMMON STOCK

The following table sets forth the high and low prices of our common stock for each period indicated and are as reported by the Bulletin Board for the dates indicated. Such quotations reflect prices between dealers in securities and do not include any retail mark-up, markdowns or commissions and may not necessarily represent actual transactions.

Fiscal Period	High	Low

2011:
First Quarter	$0.65	$0.27
Second Quarter	$1.02	$0.33

2010:
First Quarter	$2.25	$1.10
Second Quarter	$2.05	$0.79
Third Quarter	$1.15	$0.33
Fourth Quarter	$0.70	$0.27

2009:
First Quarter	$1.71	$1.32
Second Quarter	$2.00	$1.44
Third Quarter	$2.57	$1.85
Fourth Quarter	$2.57	$1.85

As of August 1, 2011 there were approximately 1,229 stockholders of record of our common stock. We believe that there are approximately 1,400 beneficial owners of our stock.

Dividend Policy

We have not paid any dividends on our common stock to date and do not anticipate that we will pay dividends in the foreseeable future. Any payment of cash dividends on our common stock in the future will be dependent upon the amount of funds legally available, our earnings, if any, our financial condition, our anticipated capital requirements and other factors that the Board of Directors may think are relevant. However, we currently intend for the foreseeable future to follow a policy of retaining all of our earnings, if any, to finance the development and expansion of our business and, therefore, do not expect to pay any dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future.

Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans

EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION

The following table provides information as of June 30, 2011 regarding compensation plans (including individual compensation arrangements) under which our securities are authorized for issuance. Information is included for both equity compensation plans approved by our stockholders and equity compensation plans not approved by our stockholders.

Plan Category	Number of Securities to be Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights		Weighted-average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights		Number of Securities Remaining Available for Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a))
Equity compensation plans approved by stockholders		-	$	-		-

Equity compensation plans not approved by stockholders		10,269,852	$	0.94		-

Total		10,269,852	$	0.94		-

The above-referenced stock option grants were issued without registration in reliance upon the exemption afforded by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, based on certain representations made to us by the recipients.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF

FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

FOR THE PERIODS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2009

You should read the following information together with our financial statements and notes thereto that are included in this prospectus. This discussion contains forward-looking statements that involve risks, uncertainties, and assumptions. Actual results may differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, including, but not limited to, those presented under “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this prospectus.

Overview

We are an owner, operator and marketer of live sports and entertainment events. We intend to operate some or all of our currently-owned event properties and, depending on the amount of additional capital available to us, to aggregate and operate a large number of complementary live sports and entertainment events across North America and internationally. We also operate Stratus Rewards which is an invitation only, affluent lifestyle membership club, with an ultra-premium credit card rewards program.

Our business plan is to operate the Stratus Rewards program and to own all available event revenue rights from tickets/admissions, corporate sponsorship, television, print, radio, internet protocol TV, video on demand, online applications, merchandising, and hospitality. With additional funding, the objective of management is to build a profitable business by implementing an aggressive acquisition growth plan to acquire quality companies, build corporate infrastructure, and increase organic growth. The plan is to leverage operational efficiencies across an expanded portfolio of events to reduce costs and increase revenues. We intend to promote the Stratus Rewards card and our events together, obtaining maximum cross marketing benefit among card members, corporate sponsors and Stratus events.

ProElite, Inc.

Effective October 21, 2009, we entered into a Strategic Investment Agreement with ProElite, Inc. pursuant to which PEI agreed to sell to us, and we agreed to purchase from PEI, shares of PEI’s Series A Preferred Stock. The Preferred Shares are convertible into Common Stock of PEI. The amount of shares of Common Stock issuable upon conversion on a cumulative basis is equal to 95% of the sum of (a) the issued and outstanding shares of PEI as of the closing plus (b) any shares of PEI Common Stock issued after the closing upon exercise or conversion of any derivative securities of PEI outstanding as of the closing, subject to any adjustment for stock splits, stock dividends, recapitalizations etc. and, in all cases, after giving effect to the shares issuable upon conversion of the Preferred Shares. The purchase price of the Preferred Shares is $2,000,000. Pursuant to several amendments, the closing date for the purchase was extended and we lent PEI or assumed liabilities of PEI aggregating the amount of the purchase which was used by PEI for payment of outstanding liabilities of PEI, general working capital and other corporate purposes. This investment closed effective June 14, 2011.

Stratus Business Plan

We use a “roll up” strategy, targeting sports and live entertainment events and companies that are independently owned and operated or being divested by larger companies with the plan to aggregate them into one large leading live entertainment company. The strategy is to purchase these events for approximately four to six times Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization (EBITDA) of the events, with the expectation that the combined EBITDA of the Company from these events will receive a higher valuation multiple in the public markets.

Depending on the amount of available capital, we are targeting acquisitions of event properties. The goal is to aggressively build-up a critical mass of events, venues and companies that allow for numerous cross-event synergies. Specifically:

●	On the expense side, to share sales, financial and operations resources across multiple events, creating economies of scale, increasing our purchasing power, eliminating duplicative costs, and bringing standardized operating and financial procedures to all events, thus increasing the margins of all events.
●	On the revenue side, to present advertisers and corporate sponsors an exciting and diverse menu of demographics and programming that allows sponsors “one stop shopping” rather than having to deal with each event on its own, and in so doing, convert these sponsors into “strategic partners.”

With these core operational synergies and subject to available capital, we intend to (1) expand our acquisition strategy of additional live sports and entertainment events and companies, (2) create entirely new event properties on the forefront of the “experience economy” and thus tap into people’s lifestyle passions, and (3) cross-promote the Stratus Rewards Visa card with these events to enhance the results of the card and event businesses.

Our business plan is to provide integrated event management, television programming, marketing, talent representation and consulting services in the sports and other live entertainment industries. Stratus’ event management, television programming and marketing services may involve:

●	managing live entertainment events, such as Mixed Martial Arts, car shows, vintage car road rallies, music festivals and fashion shows;
●	producing television programs, principally sports entertainment and live entertainment programs;

●	managing sporting events, such as college bowl games, golf tournaments and auto racing teams and events; and
●	marketing athletes, models and entertainers and organizations.

The following discussion relates to our operations and should be read in conjunction with the Notes to Financial Statements.

Description of our Revenues, Costs and Expenses

Revenues

Our past revenues have included event revenues from ticket sales, sponsorships, concessions and merchandise, which are recorded when the event occurs, and Stratus revenues from membership fees, fees on purchases and interest income earned on the redemption trust. Membership fees and related expenses are amortized over the twelve month period and fees from purchases and interest income are recorded when they occur.

Gross Profit (loss)

Our gross profit represents revenues less the cost of revenues. Our event cost of revenues sold consists of the costs renting the venue, structures at the venue, concessions, and temporary personnel hired for the event. Cost of revenues for the Stratus Rewards program consists of costs for concierge services, bank fees and other costs related to providing membership benefits.

Operating Expenses

Our selling, general and administrative expenses include personnel, rent, travel, office and other costs for selling and promoting events and running the administrative functions of the Company. Legal and professional services paid to outside attorneys, auditors and consultants are broken out separately given the size of these expenses relative to selling, general and administrative expenses. Operating expenses also include expenses for impairment of goodwill, fair value expenses for issuing common stock for consideration less than the number of shares issued valued at market closing price on the day of issuance, and Black-Scholes expenses for options and warrants.

Interest Expense

Our interest expense results from accruing interest, loans payable to shareholders, current portion of notes payable-related parties and notes payable.

Critical Accounting Policies

Goodwill and Intangible Assets

Intangible assets consist of goodwill related to certain events and the Stratus Rewards Visa White Card that we have acquired. Goodwill represents the excess of the cost of an acquired entity over the net amounts assigned to tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed. We apply the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 142 Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, which requires allocating goodwill to each reporting unit and testing for impairment using a two-step approach.

We purchased several events that are valued on our balance sheet as intangible assets with a value equal to the consideration paid for such assets, which generally include licensing rights, naming rights, merchandising rights and the right to hold such event in particular geographic locations. There was no goodwill assigned to any of these events and the value of the consideration paid for each event is considered to be the value for each related intangible asset. Each event has separate accounts for tracking revenues and expenses per event and a separate account to track the asset valuation.

A portion of the consideration used to purchase the Stratus Rewards Visa card program was allocated to specific assets, as disclosed in the footnotes to the financial statements, with the difference between the specific assets and the total consideration paid for the program being allocated to goodwill.

Goodwill and intangible assets were as follows:

	December 31,
	2010		2009

Licensing rights for events	$	2,124,258	$	2,224,258
Goodwill for Stratus Rewards		1,073,345		1,073,345
Identified intangible assets for Stratus Rewards		131,430		726,840
Total intangible assets and goodwill	$	3,329,033	$	4,024,443

We review the value of intangible assets and related goodwill as part of our annual reporting process, which generally occurs in February or March of each calendar year. In between valuations, we conduct additional tests if circumstances warrant such testing. For example, if we were unable to secure the services of any sponsoring banks, we would then undergo a thorough valuation of the intangible assets related to our Stratus Rewards program.

To review the value of intangible assets and related goodwill, we compare discounted cash flow forecasts with the stated value of the assets on the balance sheet.

The events are forecasted based on historical results for those events, adjusted over time for the assumed synergies expected from discounts from purchases of goods and services from a number of events rather than from each event on its own, and for synergies resulting from the expected ability to provide sponsors with benefits from sponsoring multiple events with a single point of contact.

These forecasts are discounted at a range of discount rates determined by taking the risk-free interest rate at the time of valuation, plus a premium for equity risk, plus a premium related to small companies in general, plus a risk premium for factors specific to the Company and the business that range from 10.0% for events to 40% for the Stratus Rewards Visa card. The total discount rates ranged from 35% for events to 65% for the Stratus Rewards program. Terminal values are determined by taking cash flows in year five of the forecast, then applying an annual growth of 2.2% to 4.1% for the next seven years and discounting that stream of cash flows by the discount rate used for that section of the business.

If we determine that the discount factor for cash flows should be substantially increased, or the event will not be able to being operations when planned, it is possible that the values for the intangible assets currently on the balance sheet could be substantially reduced or eliminated, which could result in a maximum charge to operations equal to the current carrying value of the intangible assets of $3,329,033.

We believe that the events carried as intangible assets on the balance sheet will generate revenues and be profitable because they were profitable when they were acquired by us and we have demonstrated that we can operate events in a profitable manner.

The following chart shows each event with an intangible value on the balance sheet as of December 31, 2010 and the peak revenue and gross margin that each event achieved prior to acquisition. It should be noted that most events while privately owned tend to commingle business and personal expenses in an attempt to minimize profitability and the attendant tax liability, and that once owned by the Company we have or intend to eliminate those personal expenses in an attempt to maximize profitability.

		Pre- Acquisition Peak Year Results (rounded to nearest thousand)
	Peak Year	Revenues		Gross Margin $		Gross Margin %
Freedom Bowl	1996	$	3,603,000	$	607,000		16.8	%
Santa Barbara Concours	2000		880,000		229,000		26.0	%
Beverly Hills Concours	2001		1,304,000		274,000		21.0	%
Core Tour	2002		2,300,000		667,000		29.0	%
Maui Music Festival	2000		923,000		203,000		22.0	%
		$	9,010,000	$	1,980,000		21.9	%

As of December 31, 2010, the following are the results and assumptions used for the valuation of intangibles assets and goodwill:

			Unaudited
								Key Forecast Assumptions
	As of 12/31/2010										Year		Annual
	Book		Fair		Fair Value			Discount			Revenues		Growth
Event/Item	Balance		Value		As % of Book			Rate			Begin		Rate
Beverly Hills Concours	$	169,958	$	1,819,849		1,071	%		35	%		2011		7	%
Santa Barbara Concours		243,000		2,529,936		1,041	%		35	%		2011		7	%
Core Tour		1,067,069		1,632,755		153	%		35	%		2011		16	%
Freedom Bowl		344,232		983,592		286	%		35	%		2012		7	%
Maui Music		300,000		417,454		139	%		35	%		2012		13	%
Total Events		2,124,259		7,383,586		348	%

Stratus Rewards:
Technology		58,629
Membership list		49,500
Corporate partner list		23,300
Corporate membership		-
Goodwill		1,073,345
Total Stratus Rewards		1,204,774		15,528,253		1,289	%		65	%		2011		171	%
Total Events & Stratus	$	3,329,033	$	22,911,839		688	%

Key assumptions and risk factors for each of the events and Stratus Rewards are as follows. Each event carries general risks of restarting an event after being dormant for a number of years and requires the availability of sufficient capital, along with the specific risks mentioned below. Most events are held during the summer months and require approximately six months of lead time to adequately plan the event.

Beverly Hills Concours: We plan on running this car show in 2012 and revenues in that year are forecast at $2,305,000. Revenues are assumed to grow at 7% per year thereafter as the event becomes reestablished and gains in popularity. This event was last operated by us in August 2007. In order to allow for ticket revenue and restricted access, we are planning on moving from the Rodeo Drive location used in the past to another venue. The success of the event is dependent on revenues from sponsorship, gated VIP and special events held in conjunction with the event, and entrance fees for vehicles.

Santa Barbara Concours: We ran a limited version of this event in 2010 which generated revenues of $40,189. In 2011, revenues from this event are forecast at $513,000. After reestablishing the event, it is assumed to grow at a rate of 7% per year. Depending on the venue selected for the event, we may have to obtain local permits, the granting of which cannot be assured.

Core Tour: We have been in discussions with the former principals of the Core Tour for them to play active operations management consulting roles to initiate the Core Tour in 2012. This event has not been run since 2004. Revenues are forecast to begin in 2012 at $1,680,000, compared with peak revenues in 2002 of $2,300,000. Revenues are assumed to grow at 16% per year thereafter as the events become established. In addition to the need to obtain local permits to conduct the events, the involvement of the former principals is important for the event to be successfully run, since these principals have extensive knowledge of the market, the venues and the competitors.

Freedom Bowl: This event was last conducted in 1996, prior to our acquisition of this event in 1998. We plan to begin recertification in 2011 to allow for sufficient time for the National College Athletics Association to recertify this event for 2012 and for strategic negotiations with target NCAA Conference alignment. While there is no guarantee that certification will be achieved by 2012, revenues in 2012 are forecast to be $3,124,000, compared with peak revenues in 1996 of $3,603,000. In the event that recertification is not obtained in a timely manner, forecasted revenues will be delayed. Revenues are assumed to grow at 7% per year thereafter as the event becomes established. In order to conduct this event successfully, we must obtain certification from the NCAA, obtain acceptance and cooperation from the appropriate NCAA Conference(s), obtain a stadium lease, and obtain television coverage with acceptable economics.

Maui Music Festival: This event was last conducted in 2002, prior to its acquisition by us in 2003. This event is planned to be restarted in the summer of 2012, with forecast revenues of $620,000, compared with peak revenues in 2000 of $923,000. After restarting the event, revenues are assumed to increase at 13% per annum thereafter. In order to conduct this event successfully, we must obtain local permits, engage the appropriate artists to perform and obtain the cooperation of local hotels and tour operators to establish “package” deals for customers to combine attendance at the festival with hotel and vacation planning.

Stratus Rewards VISA Program: Revenues for 2012 are forecast to be $10,560,000, compared to $517,620 of revenues realized in the 22 months the program was run by us. The limited amount of revenues realized during this 22-month period was largely related to the then-sponsoring bank limiting the acceptance of new cardholders. Our forecast is based on the assumption that the new sponsoring bank will activate more users than the prior bank. In addition, the credit card market is highly regulated and if regulations change in such a manner that restricts our ability to expand, the value of the intangibles related to the Stratus Rewards VISA program could be adversely affected.

We have hired an experienced bank executive as Vice President of Stratus Rewards with the sole responsibility to obtain one or more new banks as partners in the program and to relaunch the program by 2011. Effective May 14, 2010, we entered into a Co-branded Card Agreement with Cornèr Banca SA, located in Lugano, Switzerland. Under the Agreement, the parties agreed to jointly launch a co-branded consumer card payment solution targeted at high net worth individuals and a co-branded commercial payment solution targeted at small and mid-sized businesses. The cards, to be issued by the Bank, will include a loyalty rewards program. The cards are targeted to residents of Europe. The initial term of the Agreement is five years. The Company, among other things, will be responsible for marketing and administration of, and expenses relating to, the rewards program. The Bank will be responsible for issuing the cards. We receive a share of purchase transactions generated by a card holder and membership and initiation fees.

We perform a goodwill impairment test annually or whenever a change has occurred that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of an intangible asset below its carrying amount. We engaged an outside service provider, who computed the estimated fair value of our intangible assets at December 31, 2010, using several valuation techniques, including discounted cash flow analysis. The service provider computed future projected cash flows using information we provided, including estimated future results of the events and card operations. We then compared the estimated fair value of the reporting unit to the carrying value of the reporting unit.

As of December 31, 2010, we determined that the $450,000 of value assigned to Stratus Rewards as Corporate Membership was no longer available to us and that $100,000 of value assigned to Stratus Rewards proprietary software had been impaired given the availability of commercial software with similar or better functionality. Accordingly, we took total impairment charges of $550,000 as of December 31, 2010, and wrote off the $450,000 carrying value of the Stratus Rewards Corporate Membership and reduced the carrying value of the Stratus Rewards software by $100,000.

As of December 31, 2009, we determined that the seller of the Beverly Hills Concours event could not deliver the vote of the merchants on Rodeo Drive to allow the event to be held there. Because of that determination and the statute of limitations had expired on the ability of the sellers to collect on the remaining portion of the event acquisition liability, we eliminated the remaining event acquisition liability and wrote the $430,043 against the Beverly Hills Concours intangible asset, resulting in no net expense. During 2009, a trademark expired relating to the Long Beach Marathon and we have elected to not renew the trademark and to no longer plan to conduct this event in the future. Accordingly, an impairment charge of $300,000 was taken in 2009. In addition, we determined that $15,000 of intangible assets for athlete management had been impaired and a charge was taken in 2009 for this amount. The fair value for the Maui Music Festival as of December 31, 2009 was determined to be $510,356, which was less than the book value of this asset. Accordingly, we recorded an impairment charge of $325,805 to bring the book value for the Maui Music Festival to $400,000. We incurred another impairment charge of $100,000 at December 31, 2010.

Income Taxes

We utilize SFAS No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes,” which is codified in FASB ASC Topics 740-10 and 740-30, which requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements or tax returns. Under this method, deferred income taxes are recognized for the tax consequences in future years of differences between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their financial reporting amounts at each year-end based on enacted tax laws and statutory tax rates applicable to the periods in which the differences are expected to affect taxable income. Valuation allowances are established, when necessary, to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized. The provision for income taxes represents the tax payable for the period and the change during the period in deferred tax assets and liabilities.

As of December 31, 2010, we had a deferred tax asset of $10,708,426, that was fully reserved and a net operating loss carryforward of approximately $23,402,642 for Federal purposes. The Company will continue to monitor all available evidence and reassess the potential realization of its deferred tax assets. If we continue to meet our financial projections and improve our results of operations, or if circumstances otherwise change, it is possible that we may release all or a portion of our valuation allowance in the future. Any such release would result in recording a tax benefit that would increase net income in the period the valuation is released.

Stock-Based Compensation

Effective January 1, 2006, we adopted SFAS No. 123R, Share Based Payment (SFAS No. 123R), which is codified in FASB ASC Topics 718, using the modified prospective transition method. New awards and awards modified, repurchased or cancelled after January 1, 2006 trigger compensation expense based on the fair value of the stock option as determined by the Black-Scholes option pricing model. We amortize stock-based compensation for such awards on a straight-line method over the related service period of the awards taking into account the effects of the employees’ expected exercise and post-vesting employment termination behavior.

We account for equity instruments issued to non-employees in accordance with the provisions of SFAS 123R and EITF Issue No. 96-18. The fair value of each option granted is estimated as of the grant date using the Black-Scholes option pricing model.

Results of Operations for the Year Ended December 31, 2010

Revenues

Revenues for 2010 (“Current Period”) were $40,189, an increase of $40,189 from $0 in revenues for 2009 (“Prior Period”). The event revenues in the Current period were related to a decreased-scale Santa Barbara Concours d’Elegance held in October 2010.

Gross Profit (Loss)

The overall gross margin for the Current Period was negative $170,204, compared to overall gross margin for the Prior Period of $0. The decreased-scale Santa Barbara Concours d’Elegance held in October 2010 was designed to re-establish our position in the automotive event business. To do so, we established a cost structure intended to successfully position the business, rather than a cost structure intended for profitability. Of the $210,393 in cost of revenues for this event, $75,246 was for advertising and marketing, $65,200 was for facilities and rentals, $13,536 was for charitable contributions and $56,411 was for other expenses.

Operating Expenses

Overall operating expenses for the Current Period were $7,466,752, an increase of $3,877,485, or 108%, from $3,589,267 in the Prior Period. General and administrative expenses in the Current Period of $2,167,840 increased by $1,189,594, or 118%, from $992,497 in the Prior Period, primarily related to an increase of $800,477 in personnel expenses in the Current Period and an increase of $170,233 in marketing and promotion expenses, primarily for our White Card program.

Impairment of Intangible Expenses for the Current Period was $650,000, an increase of $9,195, or 1%, from $640,805 in the Prior Period. The amount of expense in both years was based on our annual review for impairment.

Warrant and Fair Value expense was $2,934,040, an increase of $1,772,447, or 153%, from $1,161,593 in the Prior Period, related to a $2,531,268 increase in Black-Scholes expense for options granted during the Current Year for employment contracts, offset by a decrease of $758,821 in Fair Value expense related to securities being sold in 2010 that were closer to market price than in 2009.

Legal and professional services of $1,665,200 increased by $918,032, or 123%, from $747,168 in the Prior Period, primarily related to an increase of $355,173 in consulting services used to establish and develop operations in Europe, $302,500 for financial consultants to assist in raising capital for us and providing financial guidance, and an increase of $419,707 in legal expenses, primarily related to litigation, offset by a $169,520 reduction in general consulting expenses. Depreciation and amortization remained relatively constant with $49,672 in the Current Period, compared with $47,204 in the Prior Period.

Other (Income)/Expenses

Other Income/(Expenses) for the Current Period was a net expense of $691,260, which decreased by $1,002,346, or 322%, from a net income of $311,086 in Prior Period. The net expense in the Current Period was related to an expense of $704,480 for the issuance of 835,822 shares of common stock as final settlement of a dispute with a long-term shareholder regarding the number of shares issued pursuant to a subscription agreement executed during 2007. The net income of $311,086 in the Prior Period reflected a gain of $312,971 on the writeoff for accounts payable related to events that were canceled in 2004 and 2005 and which were past the statute of limitations for collection.

Interest Expense

Interest expense was $81,389 in the Current Period, a decrease of $41,528, or 34%, from $122,917 in the Prior Period, primarily related to lower levels of debt.

Quarterly Results (Unaudited)

The following table sets forth in thousands our quarterly unaudited historical revenues, operating income and net loss for the first three quarters of 2009, 2010 and the first quarter of 2011:

	Three Months Ended (Thousands except earnings per share)
	6/30/09			9/30/09			12/31/09			3/31/10			6/30/10			9/30/10			12/31/10			3/31/11

Revenues	$	-		$	-		$	-		$	-		$	-		$	-		$	40		$	-
Cost of Revenues		-			-			-			-			-			-			210			-
Gross Profit		-			-			-			-			-			-			(170	)		-

Impairment of intangibles		-			-			641			-			-			-			650			-
Fair value charge for stock sales
and value of warrants issued		305			110			635			2,838			807			635			(1,360	)		-
Other operating expenses		426			461			631			548			1,013			1,008			1,328			1,674
Total operating expenses		731			571			1,907			3,386			1,820			1,643			618			1,674

Loss from operations		(731	)		(571	)		(1,907	)		(3,386	)		(1,820	)		(1,643	)		(788	)		(1,674	)
Other (income) expenses		(21	)		(19	)		(176	)		540			18			190			25			40
Net Loss	$	(710	)	$	(552	)	$	(1,731	)	$	(3,926	)	$	(1,838	)	$	(1,833	)	$	(813	)	$	(1,714	)

Basic and diluted earnings
per share	$	(0.01	)	$	(0.01	)	$	(0.03	)	$	(0.07	)	$	(0.03	)	$	(0.03	)	$	(0.01	)	$	(0.03	)
Basic and diluted weighted-
average common shares		57,776			57,751			57,986			59,087			60,768			62,522			64,139			64,220

Liquidity and Capital Resources

The report of our independent registered public accounting firm on the financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 contains an explanatory paragraph expressing substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern as a result of recurring losses, a working capital deficiency, and negative cash flows. The financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts or the amounts and classification of liabilities that would be necessary if we are unable to continue as a going concern.

As of December 31, 2010, our principal sources of liquidity consisted of accounts payable and accrued expenses and the issuance of equity securities. In addition to funding operations, our principal short-term and long-term liquidity needs have been, and are expected to be, the settling of obligations to our creditors, capital expenditures, the funding of operating losses until we achieve profitability, and general corporate purposes. In addition, commensurate with our level of sales, we will require working capital for sales and marketing costs to market our event properties. At December 31, 2010, we had no cash on hand and we had negative working capital of $4,317,164. At December 31, 2009, we had no cash on hand and we had negative working capital of $3,160,140.

During the year ended December 31, 2010, we sold 3,474,230 shares of common stock to investors for $2,310,000. In the six months ended June 30, 2011, we raised a total of $12,539,965 through the issuance of 44,666 shares of Series D Preferred Stock and issuance of warrants to purchase 1,339,965 shares of common stock for $1,339,965, 7,142,857 shares of common stock and warrants to purchase 10,714,286 shares for $2,500,000 and 8,700 shares of Series E Preferred Stock for $8,700,000.

Cash Flows

The following table sets forth our cash flows for 2010 and 2009:

	Year Ended December 31,
	2010			2009
Operating activities	$	(1,981,126	)	$	(1,057,070	)
Investing activities		(1,384,445	)		(213,122	)
Financing activities		3,365,571			1,269,392
Total change	$	-		$	(800	)

Operating Activities

Operating cash flows for 2010 reflect our net loss of $8,409,605, offset by a source of funds from working capital of $728,293, impairment of intangible assets of $650,000, non-cash items (depreciation and amortization) of $49,672, and expense for value of stock issued in excess of liabilities received of $2,934,040. The change in working capital is primarily related to an increase of $518,307 of accounts payable, a net of $293,125 of accrued salaries, and $525,678 of accrued liabilities, offset, in part, by an increase in prepaid expenses.

Operating cash flows for 2009 reflect our net loss of $3,401,098, offset by a source of funds from working capital of $336,277, impairment of intangible assets of $640,805, non-cash items (depreciation and amortization) of $47,204 and expense for value of stock issued in excess of liabilities received of $1,161,593. The change in working capital is primarily related to a net of $277,500 of accrued salaries, $118,305 of accrued interest, and $217,916 of accrued liabilities, offset by a decrease of $163,832 for deferred salaries.

Investing Activities

Capital constraints resulted in no cash used in investing activities during either period.

Summary of Contractual Obligations

Set forth below is information concerning our known contractual obligations as of December 31, 2010 that are fixed and determinable by year.

									After
	Total		2011		2012		2013		2013
Debt obligations*	$	1,000,000	$	375,000	$	500,000	$	125,000	$	-
Other debt obligations		547,017		547,017		-		-		-
Event acquisition liabilities		483,718		483,718		-		-		-
Legal Judgments		90,732		90,732		-		-		-
Rent obligations		207,612		69,204		69,204		69,204		-
Total	$	2,329,079	$	1,565,671	$	569,204	$	194,204	$	-

Debt incurred in connection with acquisition of Stratus. Repayment is triggered by first funding of at least $3,000,000. For purposes of this schedule such funding is assumed to occur by June 30, 2011.

Financing Activities

During 2010, we received cash proceeds of $2,310,000 and $625,720 from the sales of common and preferred stock, respectively. In 2009, we received cash proceeds of $1,294,000 from the sale of common stock.

In the six months ended June 30, 2011, we raised a total of $12,539,965 through the issuance of 44,666 shares of Series D Preferred Stock and issuance of warrants to purchase 1,339,965 shares of common stock for $1,339,965, 7,142,857 shares of common stock and warrants to purchase 10,714,286 shares for $2,500,000 and 8,700 shares of Series E Preferred Stock for $8,700,000.

Off Balance Sheet Arrangements

We have no off balance sheet arrangements.

Results of Operations for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2011

Revenues

Revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2011 (“Current Period”) were $0, which was the same for the three months ended March 31, 2010 (“Prior Period”). It is anticipated that revenues will commence for events starting in the third quarter of 2011.

Gross Profit

There was no cost of revenues in either the Current Period or the Prior Period, so the gross profit in the Current Period was $0 and the gross profit in the Prior Period was $0.

Operating Expenses

Overall operating expenses for the Current Period were $1,674,375, an increase of $478,257, or 40%, from $1,196,118 in the Prior Period. This increase was primarily due to a $574,660 increase in general and administrative expenses reflecting greater payroll expenses as the Company increased staff to have in place for the commencement of revenues. There was a decrease in warrant and option expense of $147,425. Legal and professional services were $280,090 in the Current Period, an increase of $49,526 versus $230,564 in the Prior Period. The Company continues to defend the lawsuits set forth in detail in the footnotes to the financial statements.

Other Expense

Other expense decreased by $522,188 in the Current Period from $525,378 in the Prior Period, which was for an expense that did not repeat in 2011 for the issuance of 477,616 shares of common stock to settle a dispute with a long-term shareholder regarding the number of shares issued pursuant to a subscription agreement executed during 2007.

Interest Expense

Interest expense was $36,813 in the Current Period, an increase of $22,065 from $14,747 in the Prior Period, primarily for interest associated with the preferred stock outstanding and an increase in interest-bearing debt to an officer of the Company.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

The report of our independent registered public accounting firm on the financial statements for the year ended 2010 contains an explanatory paragraph expressing substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern as a result of recurring losses, a working capital deficiency, and negative cash flows. The financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts or the amounts and classification of liabilities that would be necessary if we are unable to continue as a going concern.

As of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, our principal sources of liquidity consisted of increases to the Company’s accounts payable and accrued expenses and the issuance of equity securities. In addition to funding operations, our principal short-term and long-term liquidity needs have been, and are expected to be, the settling of obligations to our creditors, capital expenditures, the funding of operating losses until we achieve profitability, and general corporate purposes. In addition, commensurate with our level of sales, we will require working capital for sales and marketing costs to market our event properties. At December 31, 2010, we had no cash on hand and we had negative working capital of $4,317,164. At March 31, 2011, we had no cash on hand and we had negative working capital of $4,892,972.

During 2010, we sold 3,474,230 shares of common stock to investors for $2,310,000. In the six months ended June 30, 2011, we raised a total of $12,539,965 through the issuance of 44,666 shares of Series D Preferred Stock and issuance of warrants to purchase 1,339,965 shares of common stock for $1,339,965, 7,142,857 shares of common stock and warrants to purchase 10,714,286 shares for $2,500,000 and 8,700 shares of Series E Preferred Stock for $8,700,000.

We believe this financing coupled with future positive cash flow from operations may result in the future removal of the going concern qualification of the audit opinion similar to the one rendered by our independent auditors for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 although no assurance can be given that such removal will actually occur on the timing thereof.

Cash Flows

The following table sets forth our cash flows as of the dates indicated:

	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2011			2010
	(unaudited)			(unaudited)
Operating activities	$	(572,194	)	$	(356,443	)
Investing activities		-			(406,613	)
Financing activities		572,194			1,228,528
Total change	$	-		$	465,472

Operating Activities

Operating cash flows for the three months ended March 31, 2011 reflects the net loss of $1,714,378, primarily offset, in part, non-cash expenses of $501,126 for warrant and options expenses, $627,679 of net changes in working capital, and $13,379 of depreciation and amortization expense.

Operating cash flows for the three months ended March 31, 2010 reflects the net loss of $1,736,243, primarily offset by non-cash expenses of $648,551 for the excess of fair value of common stock sales over the consideration received and Black-Scholes cost of warrant issuance, the issuance of stock issued for services and to settle a legal dispute totaling $525,378, changes in working capital of $193,987 and depreciation and amortization of $11,883.

Investing Activities

We advanced $406,613 in cash to ProElite, Inc. during the three months ended March 31, 2010 for operating expenses and did not use cash for investing activities during the three months ended March 31, 2011.

Financing Activities

During the three months ended March 31, 2011, we received $270,000 from the issuance of preferred stock, $200,000 from the receipt of a subscription receivable for common stock and $102,194 related to bank overdrafts.

Off Balance Sheet Arrangements

We have no off balance sheet arrangements.

DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS,

PROMOTERS AND CONTROL PERSONS

Directors

The following table sets forth, as of June 30, 2011, the names of, and certain information concerning, our directors:

Name	Age	Position	Director Since	End of Term
Paul Feller	46	Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board	1999	2012
Randall Cross	57	Director	2009	2012
Glenn Golenberg	70	Director	2009	2012
Michael Dunleavy, Sr.	57	Director	2009	2012
Jerry Rubinstein	73	Director	2011	2012

Paul Feller - Mr. Feller has been involved with the management of live entertainment events for over 15 years. He has been the President & CEO of Pro Sports & Entertainment, Inc. since November 1998 and of Stratus since March, 2008. Prior to founding Pro Sports & Entertainment, he served as COO and CEO of PSI, an international live entertainment business which operated sports events in Asia, Europe and North America. Mr. Feller had responsibility for developing PSI’s new markets in China and the US. He negotiated agency rights and agreements with the America’s Cup syndicate, Professional Volleyball Tour, Disney’s Freedom Bowl, Andretti Indy Racing Team, Long Beach Marathon, and both the Vancouver Open and ATP Shanghai Open Tennis Tournaments. As head of PSI’s Asia division, Mr. Feller managed a $35 million revenue operation, developed agreements with STAR Television and China’s CCTV and operated the first international professional soccer tournament in China. He has been a member of the Los Angeles Sports Council, Orange County Sports Council, Asia International Business and Entertainment Association, US Professional Cycling Association, and the UK Professional Cycling Association. Prior to PSI, Mr. Feller was a vice president of marketing and sales with Osborne Computer Corporation and a senior engineer with McDonnell Douglas. He attended Purdue University for mechanical engineering and has taken graduate courses in law at Columbus University School of Law and graduate courses in business at Pepperdine University.

Randall (“Randy”) Cross - played football for the University of California, Los Angeles, where he received All Conference honors, All American honors and played an important role in the UCLA victory at the Rose Bowl in 1976. After being drafted in the second round of the 1976 NFL draft by the San Francisco 49ers, Mr. Cross played professional football with the San Francisco 49ers from 1976 to 1988, where he received six All Pro selections, three Pro Bowl selections and was a key player in the 49ers’ Superbowl championships in 1982, 1985 and 1989. Since 1989, he has been a broadcaster and analyst of the NFL for CBS and NBC, working on both network’s coverage of NFL regular season, playoff and Superbowl games. He currently co-hosts “The Opening Drive” with Bob Papa on the Sirius Radio NFL Network. Off the field, Mr. Cross has been involved in marketing and promotions in several areas, including insurance, commodities and local and national retail sales. Mr. Cross joined the board in April 2009.

Glenn Golenberg - has been engaged in the financial services industry since 1966, Glenn has arranged financings well in excess of $1 billion and has served as a financial advisor in more than two hundred transactions. Glenn is presently a co-founder and Managing Director of Golenberg & Company, a merchant banking firm that invests in and offers financial advisory services to a wide variety of businesses. Founded in 1978, the Los Angeles merchant banking firm of Golenberg & Company also had offices in Cleveland and New York. He is also Managing Director of The Bellwether Group, a merchant bank which provides strategic and financial advisory services to expansion-stage emerging technology and life-science related companies. He is a founding partner of University Equity Capital, a company involved with selective biological discoveries with major universities, as well as a co-founder of K/E MEDICAL CENTERS. He is actively involved with a number of companies, and is a Director of Stratus Media Group, ProElite, Virtual Media and the ASTRUM fund. In addition, Glenn recently joined the Board of Governors of JLTV, “America’s Chosen Network.” He was co-vice chairman of Skyview Capital and is Senior Advisor to Outsource Partners International, Inc. In addition, he has been chairman of numerous operating companies in which he and partners held a controlling interest. In the past, Glenn has served as a Director of numerous publicly and privately held companies. Glenn is a member of the Business Advisory Council at his alma mater, Miami University in Oxford, Ohio, and served on the Graduate Executive Board of the Wharton Graduate School of the University of Pennsylvania, where he received his MBA degree.

He has been appointed to the Board of Governors, the Executive Committee, the Finance Committee and the Investment Committee of Cedars-Sinai Hospital, the Investment and Finance Committees of Wilshire Boulevard Temple, and the board, the Executive and the Finance Committees of the Jewish Community Foundation. Glenn also served on the Executive and Finance Committees of the Jewish Federation and has served as Chairman of the Pension Investment Committee as well as Vice General Chairman of the United Jewish Fund. He was a member of Kennedy Center’s National Committee for the Performing Arts and was Co-Chairman of the Special Gifts Committee of the Music Center in Los Angeles, and is currently Vice Chairman of the International Advisory Board of the Tel Aviv University Recanati Business School, and is a member of the executive committee of the American friends of Tel Aviv university. Glenn is also a member of the executive committee of the America-Israel Friendship League. Mr. Golenberg joined the board in April 2009.

Michael Dunleavy, Sr.- From 2003 until 2010 Mr. Dunleavy was the head coach and from 2008 to 2010 also the general manager of the Los Angeles Clippers. Selected in the sixth round (99th pick overall) by Philadelphia in 1976, Dunleavy played 11 seasons in the NBA with career averages of 8.0 points and 3.9 assists in 438 games for Philadelphia (1976-78), Houston (1978-82), San Antonio (1982-83) and Milwaukee (1983-85, 1988-1990). He began his coaching career as head coach for the Los Angeles Lakers is 1990. He then went on to coaching the Portland Trail Blazers and under his guidance the team matched its second best victory total in Blazers history. Dunleavy earned the 1999 NBA Coach of the Year award. Last season he coached his 1000th career game and won his 500th career game prior to leaving the Los Angeles Clippers. Mr. Dunleavy joined the board in October 2009.

Jerry Rubinstein – Mr. Rubinstein has served on the board of directors of Tilly’s Inc., a retail chain of stores specializing in apparel for 14 to 25 year-old customers, and also as Chairperson of its Audit Committee since April 2011. Tilly’s Inc. is currently a privately held company. From 2006 to present, Mr. Rubinstein has been a member of the board of directors and Chairman of the Audit Committee of CKE Restaurants, Inc., a privately held reporting company, a quick service restaurant company. Since 2006, he has been Non-Executive Chairman of U.S. Global Investors, Inc., a publicly traded mutual fund advisory company. Mr. Rubinstein has started and sold many companies over the years, including Bel Air Savings and Loan, United Artist Records, an international music recording and distribution company, DMX, a cable and satellite music international distribution company, and XTRA Music Ltd., a satellite and cable music distribution company in Europe. Recently, Mr. Rubinstein has consulted for many companies on various transactions such as Alta Holdings inc., a risk management company, where he served as chairman of the board from 2009 to 2011. Mr. Rubinstein is a Certified Public Accountant (inactive) and licensed to practice law in California. With over 45 years of experience starting and managing the growth of companies in a variety of industries, including significant financial management experience, Mr. Rubinstein brings to our board of directors extensive management experience and business understanding on issues facing growth companies. Mr. Rubinstein joined the board in May 2011.

Executive Officers

The following table sets forth, as of June 30, 2011, the name of, and certain information concerning, our executive officers other than Mr. Feller, none of whom serve on the board of directors:

Name	Age	Position
John Moynahan	54	Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

William Kelly	47	Senior Vice President and Chief Operating Officer

Charles Bearchell	56	Chief Accounting Officer – Stratus Media Group Chief Financial Officer – ProElite Inc.

Paul Sewell	50	Senior Vice President, Global Marketing, Public Relations and Sales

John Moynahan - With over 32 years of business experience, Mr. Moynahan has been a treasurer for four years and CFO for 18 years of publicly-traded companies ranging from development stage to a billion dollars in annual revenues. During this span, Mr. Moynahan has been responsible for SEC reporting and compliance, successfully executing an IPO, completing over $500 million in debt financings, over $120 million in equity financings, and investigating and closing acquisitions with companies such as Fisher Scientific Group, Card Systems Solutions, Inc., Innovative Technology Applications, Inc., and Xybernaut Corporation. Mr. Moynahan joined the Company in 2008 and prior to that time was Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Who’s Your Daddy, Inc. from May 2007 to September 2008, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Xybernaut Corporation from 1999 to 2004 and from 2005 to 2006, and the Vice President of Finance and Corporate Development of Innovative Technology Application Inc. from 2004 to 2005. Mr. Moynahan began his career in the New York City office of Ernst & Young in 1979. He received a B.A. from Colgate University, where he was elected to the Phi Beta Kappa honor society, an M.B.A from New York University and a C.P.A. from New York State. Mr. Moynahan is also a co-inventor on five issued U.S. patents and over 100 corresponding international patents.

William Kelly - Mr. Kelly joined Stratus in 2010, bringing over twenty years of entertainment and media operations and management experience. Mr. Kelly was the chief operating officer for ProElite, Inc. from 2006 to 2008. From 2008 to 2010, Mr. Kelly was Managing Director of Multichannel Markets Asia. Prior to that time, Mr. Kelly Co-founded Television Korea 24 Inc. (tvk24) in 2003, where he served as Chief Operating Officer. In 2001, Mr. Kelly joined the Extreme Sports Channel as Chief Operating Officer International. Prior to Extreme Sports Channel, Mr. Kelly was Vice President and Head of International for NBC Internet (San Francisco), Vice President of CNBC Asia (Singapore), President of Turner Broadcasting International (Tokyo), and held positions with the Long Term Credit Bank of Japan (Tokyo) and Allied Irish Banks (Ireland). Mr. Kelly is a graduate of Castleknock College Dublin, speaks several languages and holds various certificates in banking and international business. He is a native of Ireland.

Charles Bearchell – Mr. Bearchell has served as a financial consultant in both publicly and privately held companies since 2005. In addition, from 2006 until 2007, Mr. Bearchell held the Chief Financial Officer position at Auriga Laboratories, a pharmaceutical company. From 2003 to 2005, Mr. Bearchell served as the Chief Financial Officer for YouBet.com, Inc., where he managed all accounting, financial and treasury functions for the publicly-held online gaming company. From 2001 to 2003, Mr. Bearchell was the controller for The Plastic Surgery Company, Inc., the owner and operator of 20 plastic surgery centers across the United States, where he managed a variety of accounting functions for the publicly-held company. Prior to that, Mr. Bearchell was the chief financial officer for AVTEL Services, Inc., where he managed all accounting and financial operations for a privately-held aircraft, maintenance and storage company. Mr. Bearchell was responsible for all SEC reporting, registration statements, and proxy statements for Lockheed Corporation from 1985 to 1995. Mr. Bearchell served as a Staff Accountant in the Los Angeles office of the Securities and Exchange Commission from 1976 to 1985. Mr. Bearchell holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Business Administration-Accounting from California State University, Northridge and a Juris Doctor degree from Southwestern University Law School in Los Angeles.

Paul Sewell – Mr. Sewell has more than 20 years of experience in leadership and senior management positions with top marketing agencies such as Young & Rubicam/WCJ and Omnicom Group. Mr. Sewell has an accomplished scope of industry-recognized success in entertainment brand marketing and business development, including Senior Vice President, Head of Corporate Marketing and Public Relations for Toby Keith’s “I Love This Bar and Grill,” (2010-2011), Executive Vice President of Partnerships and Business Development for AVP Pro Beach Volleyball (2008-2010) and Senior Vice President of Partner Integrations for House of Blues Entertainment (2005-2008). Mr. Sewell is a native of Cincinnati and completed his formal education at California State University, Northridge in Public Relations and Business Law.

Family Relationships

Other than Mr. Feller serving as chairman of the board and chief executive officer, there are no family relationships among the directors and officers.

Term of Office

Our directors and officers hold office until the earlier of their death, resignation, removal or the end of their stated term.

The Board of Directors and Committees

The Board is responsible for the supervision of the overall affairs of the Company. The Board met 6 times during the year ended December 31, 2010.

Audit Committee

The Audit Committee’s responsibilities include, but are not limited to, the following:

●	appointing, evaluating and retaining the independent registered public accounting firm,
●	reviewing and discussing with management and the independent registered public accounting firm our annual and quarterly financial statements and disclosures,
●	discussing our systems of internal control over financial reporting, and
●	meeting separately with the independent registered public accounting firm.

The audit committee was reestablished during 2009 and met five times during 2010. The committee currently consists of Jerry Rubinstein, who is the Chairman and who the Company believes qualifies as a financial expert; Glenn Golenberg, who the Company also believes qualifies as a financial expert; and Michael Dunleavy, Sr.

Compensation Committee

The compensation committee was inactive in 2009 and 2010, but was reestablished during 2011. The Compensation Committee will administer the Company’s compensation and benefit plans, in particular, the incentive compensation and equity-based plans, and will approve salaries, bonuses, and other compensation arrangements and policies for the Company’s officers, including the Chief Executive Officer. The Compensation Committee consists of Messrs. Golenberg and Rubenstein.

Overview of Executive Compensation Program

Until the Compensation Committee is established, the board of directors has responsibility for establishing, implementing and monitoring our executive compensation program philosophy and practices. The board seeks to ensure that the total compensation paid to our executive officers is fair, reasonable and competitive.

Executive Compensation

The following table sets forth information concerning the compensation earned by our Executive Officers during fiscal 2010 and 2009:

Name and Principal Position	Year	Salary			Bonus		Stock Awards (shares)			Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation		All Other Compensation		Total

Paul Feller, Chief	2010	$	240,000	(a)	$	-		-		$	-	$	-	$	240,000
Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board	2009	$	240,000	(a)	$	-		-		$	-	$	-	$	240,000

William Kelly. Chief	2010	$	207,692	(b)				1,200,000	(d)	$	-	$	-	$	207,692
Operating Officer	2009	$	-	(b)	$	-				$	-	$	-	$	-

John Moynahan,	2010	$	220,000					1,860,000	(e)					$	220,000
Chief Financial Officer	2009	$	208,882	(c)	$	-				$	-	$	-	$	208,882

(a)	Accrued but unpaid and accumulated in deferred salary
(b)	Mr. Kelly started his employment on February 22, 2010, so there was no salary in 2009 and 2010 is prorated
(c)	Mr. Moynahan started his employment on November 1, 2010 but provided services as a consultant prior to that date
(d)	Consists of stock options with a five-year life, a $2.00 strike price and subject to a vesting schedule
(e)	Consists of 1,560,000 stock options with a five-year life, a $2.00 strike price, subject to a vesting schedule, and a grant of 300,000 shares of restricted stock

We have an Employment Agreement (“Agreement”), dated January 1, 2007, with Paul Feller that is effective until January 1, 2013. This Agreement requires us to offer a non-qualified stock option to purchase 10% of the fully diluted shares of our capital stock issued and outstanding on January 1, 2007, the effective date of the Agreement. The stock option has a term of five years at an exercise price of $0.14 per share for 4,862,894 shares, vested immediately on the date of the agreement and is not assignable. This stock option is subject to a customary anti-dilution provision with respect to any stock splits, mergers, reorganizations and other such events, but does not contain any: conditions as to exercisability; tandem features; reload features; tax-reimbursement features; or any provision that could cause the exercise price to be lowered. The length of this Agreement is five years from the effective date unless the employment is terminated for another cause. During the duration of this Agreement, the Chief Executive Officer is entitled to an annual salary of $240,000 and a bonus of $250,000 in the event a Valuing Event causes us to be valued in excess of $100,000,000 and an additional bonus of $500,000 in the event a Valuing Event causes us to be valued in excess of $500,000,000. Pursuant to a written modification of this agreement on October 30, 2009, Mr. Feller agreed the Valuing Event could only occur after January 1, 2010 and waived any right to claim a bonus related to a Valuing Event prior to January 1, 2010. Mr. Feller also waived any right to claim a bonus for the period through June 30, 2011. For the years ended December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, no bonuses have been paid by us in relation to this Agreement.

On February 22, 2010, we entered into an employment contract with William Kelly, the Company’s Senior Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, and the Chief Operating Officer of ProElite, Inc., that is effective until February 22, 2013. Under the agreement, Mr. Kelly will receive an annual salary of $240,000 and shall be eligible for bonuses based on objectives established by our board of directors and Mr. Kelly’s performance against those objectives. The proposed agreement further provides that Mr. Kelly will receive a grant of options to purchase 1,200,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, with a five-year life, a strike price of $2.00 the following vesting schedule: 396,000 shares vest immediately, 396,000 shares vest on October 1, 2010 and 408,000 shares will vest on October 1, 2011. Such options shall terminate forty-five (45) days after the Executive’s employment with us is terminated if such termination is for Cause or is the result of a resignation by Executive for reasons other than Good Reason. Such options shall not be assignable by Executive. Each option described above shall be subject to customary anti-dilution provision with respect to any stock splits, mergers, reorganizations or other such events. In connection with Mr. Kelly’s employment, we assumed a promissory note of $231,525 formerly owed to Mr. Kelly by ProElite, Inc. and agreed to pay, and did pay a portion of, the promissory note in the amount of $121,525 upon the closing of the acquisition of ProElite by us, and agreed to pay the balance as follows: $55,000 90 days after the closing of the acquisition, $55,000 180 days after the closing of the acquisition.

On November 1, 2010, we entered into an employment agreement with John Moynahan, who had been providing accounting and financial services to us as a consultant. Under the agreement, Mr. Moynahan will receive an annual salary of $220,000 and will be eligible for bonuses based on objectives established by our board of directors and Mr. Moynahan’s performance against those objectives, with the bonus in the first year of the agreement to be not less than $50,000. Under this agreement, Mr. Moynahan will receive a grant of 300,000 shares and a five-year stock option grant to purchase 1,560,000 shares of common stock at $2.00 per share, with 1,040,000 shares that vested upon the signing of the agreement and 520,000 shares that will vest on September 1, 2011. Such options shall terminate forty-five (45) days after the Executive’s employment with us is terminated if such termination is for Cause or is the result of a resignation by Executive for reasons other than Good Reason. Such options shall not be assignable by Executive. Each option described above shall be subject to customary anti-dilution provision with respect to any stock splits, mergers, reorganizations or other such events. In addition, we agreed to repay approximately $127,000 in amounts due to Mr. Moynahan under his consulting agreement.

During 2010, there were no repricing or material modifications made to any outstanding options or equity-based awards.

OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR-END

The following table sets forth certain information relating to unexercised and outstanding options for each named executive officer as of December 31, 2010. No other equity awards otherwise reportable in this table had been granted to any of our executive officers as of that date.

Name	Outstanding Options		Unexercised Options that are Exercisable		Option Exercise Price		Option Expiration Date
Paul Feller, Chief Executive Officer
and Chairman of the Board		4,862,895		4,862,895	$	0.14	1/1/2012

William Kelly, Chief Operating Officer		1,200,000		792,000	$	2.00	2/22/2015

John Moynahan, Chief Financial Officer		1,560,000		1,040,000	$	2.00	11/1/2015

Employment Agreements

Future minimum payments under the employment agreements with Paul Feller, William Kelly and John Moynahan are as follows:

Years Ending December 31,		Amount
2011	$	786,500
2012		670,809
2013		40,615
	$	1,497,924

Option Plans

We intend to adopt, but have not yet completed a Stock Compensation Program. This program is intended to provide key employees, vendors, directors, consultants and other key contributors to our growth an opportunity to participate in our success. It is estimated that 15% of total shares outstanding will be authorized in options and reserved for this program. Awards under the program may be made in the form of incentive stock options, nonqualified stock options, restricted shares, rights to purchase shares under an employee stock plan, grants of options to non-employee directors, and or other specified stock rights as defined under the plan. Subject to Shareholder approval, we plan to adopt a new stock option plan in 2011.

Director Compensation

Board of Directors Compensation:

No cash compensation was paid to board members in 2009 or 2010. Board members receive a grant of 450,000 options upon joining the Board that vest monthly over a 36-month period. The Board is currently evaluating converting options granted to the board prior to July 1, 2011 into restricted stock. Effective July 1, 2011, each board member is entitled to an annual payment of $50,000, with the chairman of the audit committee receiving an additional $100,000 per annum and the chairman of the compensation committee receiving an additional $50,000 per annum. Mr. Rubinstein received a grant of 450,000 shares of restricted common stock that vest over a 36 month period and an additional grant of 450,000 shares of restricted common stock as chairman of the audit committee that vest over a 36 month period. Mr. Golenberg will receive a grant of 450,000 shares of restricted common stock that vests over a 36 month period as chairman of the compensation committee.

Related Party Transactions

From April 1, 2011 to present, $45,000 was paid to Glenn Golenberg to pay down the principal balance of a loan made to us in 2005, $463,712 was paid to Paul Feller to pay down a series of revolving lonas made to us over the past few years, $77,176 was paid to John Moynahan pursuant to his employment agreement and $121,525 was paid to William Kelly pursuant to a promissory note from Pro Elite that was assumed by us as part of his employment agreement.

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

The following table sets forth, as of June 30, 2011, the number and percentage of shares of Common Stock beneficially owned, directly or indirectly, by each of our directors, executive officers, beneficial owners known by the Company of more than five percent of the outstanding shares of our Common Stock and by our directors and executive officers as a group. Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the Rule 13d-3(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended does not necessarily indicate ownership for any other purpose, and generally includes voting or investment power with respect to the shares and shares which such person has the right to acquire within 60 days of June 30, 2011.

	Title of Class	Amount and Nature		Percent
Beneficial Owner (a)	of Stock	of Beneficial Ownership (b)		of Class (c)
5% Stockholders:
Isaac Blech	Common	40,625,000	(d)	34.4%
Ralph Feller	Common	9,405,000		7.6%
Seaside 88 LLP	Common	6,500,000		5.3%

Directors and Executive Officers:
Paul Feller, Chief Executive Officer and
Chairman of the Board of Directors	Common	31,279,236	(e)	25.4%
Randall Cross, Director	Common	337,500	(f)	0.3%
Michael Dunleavy, Sr., Director	Common	275,000	(f)	0.2%
Glenn Golenberg, Director and
Chairman of the Compensation Committee	Common	711,333	(f) (g)	0.6%
Jerry Rubinstein, Director and
Chairman of the Audit Committee	Common	37,500	(h)	0.0%
William Kelly, Chief Operating Officer	Common	792,000	(i)	0.6%
John Moynahan, Chief Financial Officer	Common	1,860,000	(j)	1.5%
All Current Directors and Executive
Officers as a Group (6 Persons)		35,292,569		28.7%

(a)	The address for each Beneficial Owner is c/o Stratus Media Group, Inc., 3 E. De La Guerra St., Santa Barbara, CA 93101.
(b)	The persons named in this table have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of common stock shown as beneficially owned by them, subject to applicable community property laws.
(c)	Based on 77,505,077 shares outstanding as of June 30, 2011.
(d)	As described in the Schedule 13D filed on June 1,2011, this amount consists of (a) 1,250,000 shares of Common Stock issuable upon conversion of the Series E Preferred Stock,1,250,000 shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of the A Warrants and 625,000 shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of the B Warrants, all owned by River Charitable Remainder Unitrust; (b) 7,500,000 shares of Common Stock issuable upon conversion of the Series E Preferred Stock, 7,500,000 shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of the A Warrants, and 3,750,000 shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of the B Warrants, all owned by West Charitable Remainder Unit trust; and (c) 7,500,000 shares of Common Stock issuable upon conversion of the Series E Preferred Stock,7,500,000 shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of the A Warrants, and 3,750,000 shares issuable upon exercise of the B Warrants, all owned by Liberty Charitable Remainder Trust. Mr. Blech is the sole trustree of each of the Trusts and has the sole voting and dispositive power of each of the Trusts. Mr. Blech disclaims beneficial ownership of the Common Stock owned by each of the Trusts except to the extent of his pecuniary interest therein. This amount does not include 1,250,000 shares of Common Stock issuable upon conversion of the Series E Preferred Stock, 1,250,000 shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of the A Warrants, and 625,000 shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of the B Warrants, all owned by Miriam Blech, Mr. Blech's wife. Mr. Blech disclaims beneficial ownership of the shares owned by Ms. Blech and Ms. Blech disclaims beneficial ownership of the shares owned by Mr. Blech and the Trusts.
(e)	Includes 26,716,341 shares held directly and options to purchase 7,812,395 shares that are fully vested.
(f)	Each director received an option grant for 450,000 shares, which vests monthly over three years.
(g)	In addition to the option grant for 450,000 shares, Mr. Golenberg received 100,000 shares per year as compensation for being chairman of the audit committee, vesting monthly over the year. On July 1, 2011 he received 450,000 shares of restricted stock as chairman of the compensation committee that vests monthly over three years. Includes 178,000 shares held by Glenn Golenberg Intervivos Trust, for which Mr. Golenberg claims beneficial ownership.
(h)	Mr. Rubinstein received a grant of 450,000 restricted shares for board membership and an additional grant of 450,000 restricted shares as chairman of the audit committee; these shares vest over a 36 month period commencing May 1, 2011.
(i)	Represents vested portion of options issued pursuant to employment agreement.
(j)	Consists of 1,560,000 vested options and restricted stock of 300,000.

SELLING SECURITYHOLDERS

Selling Securityholders Table

The shares to be offered by the selling securityholders are “restricted” securities under applicable federal and state securities laws and are being registered under the Securities Act, to give the selling securityholders the opportunity to publicly sell these shares. The registration of these shares does not require that any of the shares be offered or sold by the selling securityholders. The selling securityholders may from time to time offer and sell all or a portion of their shares in the over-the-counter market, in negotiated transactions, or otherwise, at prices then prevailing or related to the then current market price or at negotiated prices.

The registered shares may be sold directly or through brokers or dealers, or in a distribution by one or more underwriters on a firm commitment or best efforts basis. To the extent required, the names of any agent or broker-dealer and applicable commissions or discounts and any other required information with respect to any particular offer will be set forth in a prospectus supplement. Please see “Plan of Distribution.” The selling securityholders and any agents or broker-dealers that participate with the selling securityholders in the distribution of registered shares may be deemed to be “underwriters” within the meaning of the Securities Act, and any commissions received by them and any profit on the resale of the registered shares may be deemed to be underwriting commissions or discounts under the Securities Act.

No estimate can be given as to the amount or percentage of our common stock that will be held by the selling securityholders after any sales made pursuant to this prospectus because the selling securityholders are not required to sell any of the shares being registered under this prospectus. The following table assumes that the selling securityholders will sell all of the shares listed in this prospectus.

The following table sets forth the beneficial ownership of the selling securityholders. The term “selling securityholder” or “selling securityholders” includes the stockholders listed below and their respective transferees, assignees, pledges, donees or other successors. Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC and generally includes voting or investment power with respect to securities. Shares of common stock subject to options, warrants and convertible securities currently exercisable or convertible, or exercisable or convertible within 60 days are deemed outstanding, including for purposes of computing the percentage ownership of the person holding the option, warrant or convertible security, but not for purposes of computing the percentage of any other holder.

	Beneficial Ownership Before Offering							Beneficial Ownership After Offering(1)
	Number of Shares		Percent		Number of Shares Being Offered			Number of Shares		Percent
West Charitable Remainder Trust, Liberty
Charitable Remainder Trust and River Charitable
Remainder Trust		40,625,000		34.4		40,625,000	(a)		-		-
UTA Capital LLC		6,250,000		7.5		6,250,000	(b)		-		-
Miriam Wimpfheimer Blech		3,125,000		3.9		3,125,000	(c)		-		-
CGM Custodian for IRA of David S. Nagelberg		1,562,500		2.0		1,562,500	(d)		-		-
Gemini Master Fund Ltd.		1,562,500		2.0		1,562,500	(d)		-		-
Iroquois Master Fund Ltd.		1,250,000		1.6		1,250,000	(e)		-		-
Maxim Group LLC		3,600,000		4.4		3,600,000	(f)		-		-
Equity Source Partners LLC		1,000,000		1.3		1,000,000	(f)		-		-

(1)	Assumes the selling securityholder sells all of the shares of common stock included in this prospectus and based on 77,505,077 shares of common stock outstanding as of the date of this prospectus.
(a)	As described in the Schedule 13D filed on June 1,2011, this amount consists of (a) 1,250,000 shares of Common Stock issuable upon conversion of the Series E Preferred Stock,1,250,000 shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of the A Warrants and 625,000 shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of the B Warrants, all owned by River Charitable Remainder Unitrust; (b) 7,500,000 shares of Common Stock issuable upon conversion of the Series E Preferred Stock, 7,500,000 shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of the A Warrants, and 3,750,000 shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of the B Warrants, all owned by West Charitable Remainder Unittrust; and (c) 7,500,000 shares of Common Stock issuable upon conversion of the Series E Preferred Stock,7,500,000 shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of the A Warrants, and 3,750,000 shares issuable upon exercise of the B Warrants, all owned by Liberty Charitable Remainder Trust. Isaac Blech is the sole trustree of each of the Trusts and has the sole voting and dispositive power of each of the Trusts.
(b)	Consists of 2,500,000 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of Series E Preferred Stock, 2,500,000 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of Series A Warrants and 1,250,000 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of Series B Warrants.
(c)	Consists of 1,250,000 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of Series E Preferred Stock, 1,250,000 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of Series A Warrants and 625,000 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of Series B Warrants.
(d)	Consists of 625,000 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of Series E Preferred Stock, 625,000 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of Series A Warrants and 312,500 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of Series B Warrants.
(e)	Consists of 500,000 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of Series E Preferred Stock, 500,000 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of Series A Warrants and 250,000 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of Series B Warrants.
(f)	Consists of warrants to purchase shares of common stock.

The information in the above table is as of the date of this prospectus. Information concerning the selling securityholders may change from time to time and any such changed information will be described in supplements to this prospectus if and when necessary.

Relationships with Selling Securityholders

The selling securityholders did not have any position, office, or other material relationship with us or any of our affiliates within the past three years, except that Maxim Group LLC and Equity Source Partners, LLC assisted us in connection with our May 2011 private placement. Maxim Group LLC received commissions of $800,000 and warrants to purchase 3,600,000 shares of common stock and Equity Source Partners, LLC received commissions of $100,000 shares and warrants to purchase 1,000,000 shares of common stock.

PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION

We are registering the shares of common stock issued to the selling securityholders and issuable upon exercise of the warrants issued to the selling securityholders to permit the resale of these shares of common stock by the holders of the shares of common stock and warrants from time to time after the date of this prospectus. We will not receive any of the proceeds from the sale by the selling securityholders of the shares of common stock. We will bear all fees and expenses incident to our obligation to register the shares of common stock.

The selling securityholders may sell all or a portion of the shares of common stock beneficially owned by them and offered hereby from time to time directly or through one or more underwriters, broker-dealers or agents. If the shares of common stock are sold through underwriters or broker-dealers, the selling securityholders will be responsible for underwriting discounts or commissions or agent’s commissions. The shares of common stock may be sold on any national securities exchange or quotation service on which the securities may be listed or quoted at the time of sale, in the over-the-counter market or in transactions otherwise than on these exchanges or systems or in the over-the-counter market and in one or more transactions at fixed prices, at prevailing market prices at the time of the sale, at varying prices determined at the time of sale, or at negotiated prices. These sales may be effected in transactions, which may involve crosses or block transactions. The selling securityholders may use any one or more of the following methods when selling shares:

●	ordinary brokerage transactions and transactions in which the broker-dealer solicits purchasers;
●	block trades in which the broker-dealer will attempt to sell the shares as agent but may position and resell a portion of the block as principal to facilitate the transaction;
●	purchases by a broker-dealer as principal and resale by the broker-dealer for its account;
●	an exchange distribution in accordance with the rules of the applicable exchange;
●	privately negotiated transactions;
●	settlement of short sales entered into after the effective date of the registration statement of which this prospectus is a part;
●	broker-dealers may agree with the selling securityholders to sell a specified number of such shares at a stipulated price per share;
●	through the writing or settlement of options or other hedging transactions, whether such options are listed on an options exchange or otherwise;
●	a combination of any such methods of sale; and
●	any other method permitted pursuant to applicable law.

The selling securityholders also may resell all or a portion of the shares in open market transactions in reliance upon Rule 144 under the Securities Act, as permitted by that rule, or Section 4(1) under the Securities Act, if available, rather than under this prospectus, provided that they meet the criteria and conform to the requirements of those provisions.

Broker dealers engaged by the selling securityholders may arrange for other broker dealers to participate in sales. If the selling securityholders effect such transactions by selling shares of common stock to or through underwriters, broker-dealers or agents, such underwriters, broker-dealers or agents may receive commissions in the form of discounts, concessions or commissions from the selling securityholders or commissions from purchasers of the shares of common stock for whom they may act as agent or to whom they may sell as principal. Such commissions will be in amounts to be negotiated, but, except as set forth in a supplement to this Prospectus, in the case of an agency transaction will not be in excess of a customary brokerage commission in compliance with FINRA Rule 2440; and in the case of a principal transaction a markup or markdown in compliance with FINRA IM-2440.

In connection with sales of the shares of common stock or otherwise, the selling securityholders may enter into hedging transactions with broker-dealers or other financial institutions, which may in turn engage in short sales of the shares of common stock in the course of hedging in positions they assume. The selling securityholders may also sell shares of common stock short and if such short sale shall take place after the date that the registration statement, of which this prospectus forms a part, is declared effective by the Commission, the selling securityholders may deliver shares of common stock covered by this prospectus to close out short positions and to return borrowed shares in connection with such short sales. The selling securityholders may also loan or pledge shares of common stock to broker-dealers that in turn may sell such shares, to the extent permitted by applicable law. The selling securityholders may also enter into option or other transactions with broker-dealers or other financial institutions or the creation of one or more derivative securities which require the delivery to such broker-dealer or other financial institution of shares offered by this prospectus, which shares such broker-dealer or other financial institution may resell pursuant to this prospectus (as supplemented or amended to reflect such transaction). Notwithstanding the foregoing, the selling securityholders have been advised that they may not use shares registered in this registration statement to cover short sales of our common stock made prior to the date the registration statement, of which this prospectus forms a part, has been declared effective by the SEC.

The selling securityholders may, from time to time, pledge or grant a security interest in some or all of the warrants or shares of common stock owned by them and, if they default in the performance of their secured obligations, the pledgees or secured parties may offer and sell the shares of common stock from time to time pursuant to this prospectus or any amendment to this prospectus under Rule 424(b)(3) or other applicable provision of the Securities Act, amending, if necessary, the list of selling securityholders to include the pledgee, transferee or other successors in interest as selling securityholders under this prospectus. The selling securityholders also may transfer and donate the shares of common stock in other circumstances in which case the transferees, donees, pledgees or other successors in interest will be the selling beneficial owners for purposes of this prospectus.

The selling securityholders and any broker-dealer or agents participating in the distribution of the shares of common stock may be deemed to be “underwriters” within the meaning of Section 2(11) of the Securities Act in connection with such sales. In such event, any commissions paid, or any discounts or concessions allowed to, any such broker-dealer or agent and any profit on the resale of the shares purchased by them may be deemed to be underwriting commissions or discounts under the Securities Act. Selling Securityholders who are “underwriters” within the meaning of Section 2(11) of the Securities Act will be subject to the applicable prospectus delivery requirements of the Securities Act including Rule 172 thereunder and may be subject to certain statutory liabilities of, including but not limited to, Sections 11, 12 and 17 of the Securities Act and Rule 10b-5 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act.

Each selling securityholder has informed the Company that it is not a registered broker-dealer and does not have any written or oral agreement or understanding, directly or indirectly, with any person to distribute the common stock. Upon the Company being notified in writing by a selling securityholder that any material arrangement has been entered into with a broker-dealer for the sale of common stock through a block trade, special offering, exchange distribution or secondary distribution or a purchase by a broker or dealer, a supplement to this prospectus will be filed, if required, pursuant to Rule 424(b) under the Securities Act, disclosing (i) the name of each such selling securityholder and of the participating broker-dealer(s), (ii) the number of shares involved, (iii) the price at which such the shares of common stock were sold, (iv) the commissions paid or discounts or concessions allowed to such broker-dealer(s), where applicable, (v) that such broker-dealer(s) did not conduct any investigation to verify the information set out or incorporated by reference in this prospectus, and (vi) other facts material to the transaction. In no event shall any broker-dealer receive fees, commissions and markups, which, in the aggregate, would exceed eight percent (8.0%).

Under the securities laws of some states, the shares of common stock may be sold in such states only through registered or licensed brokers or dealers. In addition, in some states the shares of common stock may not be sold unless such shares have been registered or qualified for sale in such state or an exemption from registration or qualification is available and is complied with.

There can be no assurance that any selling securityholder will sell any or all of the shares of common stock registered pursuant to the shelf registration statement, of which this prospectus forms a part.

Each selling securityholder and any other person participating in such distribution will be subject to applicable provisions of the Exchange Act and the rules and regulations thereunder, including, without limitation, to the extent applicable, Regulation M of the Exchange Act, which may limit the timing of purchases and sales of any of the shares of common stock by the selling securityholder and any other participating person. To the extent applicable, Regulation M may also restrict the ability of any person engaged in the distribution of the shares of common stock to engage in market-making activities with respect to the shares of common stock. All of the foregoing may affect the marketability of the shares of common stock and the ability of any person or entity to engage in market-making activities with respect to the shares of common stock.

We will pay all expenses of the registration of the shares of common stock pursuant to the registration rights agreement, including, without limitation, Securities and Exchange Commission filing fees and expenses of compliance with state securities or “blue sky” laws; provided, however, that each selling securityholder will pay all underwriting discounts and selling commissions, if any and any related legal expenses incurred by it. We will indemnify the selling securityholders against certain liabilities, including some liabilities under the Securities Act, in accordance with the registration rights agreement, or the selling securityholders will be entitled to contribution. We may be indemnified by the selling securityholders against civil liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act, that may arise from any written information furnished to us by the selling securityholders specifically for use in this prospectus, in accordance with the related registration rights agreements, or we may be entitled to contribution.

DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES

We are presently authorized to issue 200,000,000 shares of $.001 par value common stock and 5,000,000 shares of $0.001 par value preferred stock. As of the date of this prospectus, we had 77,505,077 shares of common stock issued and outstanding, 3,333 shares of Series C preferred stock issued and outstanding, 44,666 shares of Series D preferred stock issued and outstanding and 8,700 shares of Series E preferred stock issued and outstanding.

Common Stock

The holders of our common stock are entitled to equal dividends and distributions per share with respect to the common stock when, as and if declared by the Board of Directors from funds legally available therefore. No holder of any shares of common stock has a preemptive right to subscribe for any of our securities, nor are any common shares subject to redemption or convertible into other securities. Upon liquidation, dissolution or winding-up of our company, and after payment of creditors and preferred stockholders, if any, the assets will be divided pro rata on a share-for-share basis among the holders of the shares of common stock. All shares of common stock now outstanding are fully paid, validly issued and non-assessable. Each share of our common stock is entitled to one vote with respect to the election of any director or any other matter upon which stockholders are required or permitted to vote.

Preferred Stock

Under our articles of incorporation, the Board of Directors has the power, without further action by the holders of the common stock, to designate the relative rights and preferences of the preferred stock, and to issue the preferred stock in one or more series as designated by the Board of Directors. The designation of rights and preferences could include preferences as to liquidation, redemption and conversion rights, voting rights, dividends or other preferences, any of which may be dilutive of the interest of the holders of the common stock or the preferred stock of any other series. The issuance of preferred stock may have the effect of delaying or preventing a change in control of the company without further stockholder action and may adversely affect the rights and powers, including voting rights, of the holders of the common stock. As of the date of this prospectus, we had shares of our Series C, D and E Preferred Stock outstanding.

Series C 10% Preferred Stock

Each share of Series C Preferred Stock can be converted into twenty shares of our common stock, has a liquidation preference of $30, and pays a cumulative dividend of 10% per year, payable on July 31 and December 31 of each year, payable in cash or shares of common stock at our option, and has voting rights on an as converted basis. Shares automatically convert when the closing price of a share of common stock is $5.00 or above and the average daily trading value for the prior ten trading days is above 200,000 shares. As of the date of this prospectus, 66,653 shares of common stock are issuable under conversion of Series C Preferred Stock and 199,960 shares are issuable under a price adjustment mechanism for Series C Preferred Stock.

Series D 10% Preferred Stock

Each share of Series D Preferred Stock can be converted into sixty shares of our common stock, has a liquidation preference of $30, and pays a cumulative dividend of 10% per year, payable on July 31 and December 31 of each year, payable in cash or shares of common stock at our option, and has voting rights on an as converted basis. Shares automatically convert when the closing price of a share of common stock is $5.00 or above and the average daily trading value for the prior ten trading days is above 200,000 shares. As of the date of this prospectus, 2,679,930 shares of common stock are issuable under conversion of Series D Preferred Stock and 3,079,850 shares are issuable under a price adjustment mechanism for Series C Preferred Stock.

Series E 5% Preferred Stock

The Series E preferred shares bear a dividend of 5% per annum, payable quarterly in cash, or, if the dividend shares are registered for resale, in shares of our Common Stock. The effective conversion rate for the Preferred Shares is $0.40 per share of Common Stock, subject to full ratchet anti-dilution protection. The Series E preferred shares have voting rights on an as-converted to Common Stock basis, with the investors (subject to certain exceptions) having the right to elect two members to the our Board of Directors for so long as at least 50% of the total number of the Series E preferred shares are outstanding, and the right to elect one member to our Board of Directors for so long as least 25% but less than 50% of the total number of the Series E preferred shares are outstanding. We are required to redeem any unconverted Preferred Shares on the fifth anniversary of the date of first issuance of the Series E preferred shares, and have the right to require conversion at any time if the average daily trading value for any twenty consecutive trading days exceeds $250,000 and the weighted average price per share is at least $2.50 for each of those twenty consecutive trading days. To secure the Company’s obligation to redeem the Series E preferred shares, we entered into a Security Agreement dated May 24, 2011, pursuant to which we agreed to grant the holders of the Series E Preferred Shares a first priority security interest in all of our assets.

Registration Rights Agreement

We are required to file within 90 days of the date of the final Closing of the Offering, a Registration Statement registering for resale all shares of Common Stock issuable upon conversion of the Series E Preferred Stock, issuable upon exercise of the Series E Investor Warrants or issued as dividends on the Series E Preferred Stock payable in shares of Common Stock. The holders of any registrable securities removed from the Registration Statement as a result of a Rule 415 or other comment from the SEC shall have “piggyback” registration rights for the shares of Common Stock or Common Stock underlying such warrants with respect to any registration statement filed by the Company following the effectiveness of the Registration Statement which would permit the inclusion of these shares. The Company has agreed to use its reasonable efforts to have the registration statement declared effective within 180 days of filing the registration statement (the “Effectiveness Deadline”).

If the Registration Statement is not filed on or before the Filing Deadline or not declared effective on or before the Effectiveness Deadline, we are obligated to pay to each holder of registrable securities an amount in cash equal to one percent (1.0%) of such holder’s investment herein on every thirty (30) day anniversary of such Filing Deadline or Effectiveness Deadline failure until such failure is cured. The payment amount shall be prorated for partial thirty (30) day periods. The maximum aggregate amount of payments to be made by the Company as the result of such failures, whether by reason of a Filing Deadline failure, Effectiveness Deadline failure or any combination thereof, shall be an amount equal to 10% of each holder’s investment amount. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no payments shall be owed with respect to any period during which all of the holder’s registrable securities may be sold by such holder under Rule 144 or pursuant to another exemption from registration. Moreover, no such payments shall be due and payable with respect to any registrable securities the Company is unable to register due to limits imposed by the SEC’s interpretation of Rule 415 under the Securities Act.

We are obligated to shall keep the Registration Statement effective until Rule 144 of the Securities Act is available to Investors herein with respect to all of their shares.

Description of Series E Warrants

In connection with the sale of the Series E preferred shares, we also agreed to issue to the investors (a) warrants (A Warrants) to purchase up to one additional share of Common Stock for each share of Common Stock issuable upon conversion of the preferred shares, and (b) warrants (B Warrants) to purchase up to .50 additional shares of Common Stock for each share of Common Stock issuable upon conversion of the preferred shares. The warrants are exercisable for five years commencing on the date of first issuance and are exercisable only for cash if there is an effective registration statement covering the resale of the shares issuable upon exercise of the Warrants. In the absence of such a registration statement, the Warrants are exercisable for cash or on a cashless basis at the option of the holder thereof. The exercise price of the A Warrant is $0.65 per share and the B Warrant has an exercise price of $1.00 per share, subject in each case to full ratchet anti-dilution protection.

Placement Agent Warrants

The placement agent warrants permit the placement agent or its designees to purchase for a five-year period, 3,600,000 shares of Common Stock at an exercise price of $0.65 per share. We also issued to a financial advisor warrants to purchase 1,000,000 shares of our Common Stock on substantially similar terms. The shares underlying these warrants are included in this prospectus and contain weighted average anti-dilution and cashless exercise provisions.

Anti-Takeover Effects of Provisions of Nevada State Law

We may be or in the future we may become subject to Nevada’s control share laws. A corporation is subject to Nevada’s control share law if it has more than 200 stockholders, at least 100 of whom are stockholders of record and residents of Nevada, and if the corporation does business in Nevada, including through an affiliated corporation. This control share law may have the effect of discouraging corporate takeovers.

The control share law focuses on the acquisition of a “controlling interest,” which means the ownership of outstanding voting shares that would be sufficient, but for the operation of the control share law, to enable the acquiring person to exercise the following proportions of the voting power of the corporation in the election of directors: (1) one-fifth or more but less than one-third; (2) one-third or more but less than a majority; or (3) a majority or more. The ability to exercise this voting power may be direct or indirect, as well as individual or in association with others.

The effect of the control share law is that an acquiring person, and those acting in association with that person, will obtain only such voting rights in the control shares as are conferred by a resolution of the stockholders of the corporation, approved at a special or annual meeting of stockholders. The control share law contemplates that voting rights will be considered only once by the other stockholders. Thus, there is no authority to take away voting rights from the control shares of an acquiring person once those rights have been approved. If the stockholders do not grant voting rights to the control shares acquired by an acquiring person, those shares do not become permanent non-voting shares. The acquiring person is free to sell the shares to others. If the buyer or buyers of those shares themselves do not acquire a controlling interest, the shares are not governed by the control share law.

If control shares are accorded full voting rights and the acquiring person has acquired control shares with a majority or more of the voting power, a stockholder of record, other than the acquiring person, who did not vote in favor of approval of voting rights, is entitled to demand fair value for such stockholder’s shares.

In addition to the control share law, Nevada has a business combination law, which prohibits certain business combinations between Nevada corporations and “interested stockholders” for three years after the interested stockholder first becomes an interested stockholder, unless the corporation’s board of directors approves the combination in advance. For purposes of Nevada law, an interested stockholder is any person who is: (a) the beneficial owner, directly or indirectly, of 10% or more of the voting power of the outstanding voting shares of the corporation, or (b) an affiliate or associate of the corporation and at any time within the previous three years was the beneficial owner, directly or indirectly, of 10% or more of the voting power of the then-outstanding shares of the corporation. The definition of “business combination” contained in the statute is sufficiently broad to cover virtually any kind of transaction that would allow a potential acquirer to use the corporation’s assets to finance the acquisition or otherwise to benefit its own interests rather than the interests of the corporation and its other stockholders.

The effect of Nevada’s business combination law is to potentially discourage parties interested in taking control of the Company from doing so if it cannot obtain the approval of our board of directors.

Indemnification of Officers and Directors

Nevada Revised Statutes (“NRS”) Sections 78.7502 and 78.751 provide us with the power to indemnify any of our directors, officers, employees and agents. The person entitled to indemnification must have conducted himself in good faith, and must reasonably believe that his conduct was in, or not opposed to, our best interests. In a criminal action, the director, officer, employee or agent must not have had reasonable cause to believe that his conduct was unlawful.

Under NRS Section 78.751, advances for expenses may be made by agreement if the director or officer affirms in writing that he has met the standards for indemnification and will personally repay the expenses if it is determined that such officer or director did not meet those standards.

Our bylaws include an indemnification provision under which we have the power to indemnify our directors, officers, former directors and officers, employees and other agents (including heirs and personal representatives) against all costs, charges and expenses actually and reasonably incurred, including an amount paid to settle an action or satisfy a judgment to which a director or officer is made a party by reason of being or having been a director or officer of the Company. Our bylaws further provide for the advancement of all expenses incurred in connection with a proceeding upon receipt of an undertaking by or on behalf of such person to repay such amounts if it is determined that the party is not entitled to be indemnified under our bylaws. No advance will be made by the Company to a party if it is determined that the party acted in bad faith. These indemnification rights are contractual, and as such will continue as to a person who has ceased to be a director, officer, employee or other agent, and will inure to the benefit of the heirs, executors and administrators of such a person.

Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act may be permitted for our directors, officers and controlling persons pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, we have been advised that in the opinion of the SEC such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and is, therefore, unenforceable.

Shares Eligible For Future Sale

As of the date of this prospectus, we had 77,505,077 shares of common stock issued and outstanding. In addition to our shares of common stock covered by this prospectus 66,111,472 of these shares are freely tradeable or may be publicly resold under currently effective registration statements or pursuant to Rule 144.

Rule 144

In general, under Rule 144 as currently in effect, a person (or persons whose shares are aggregated) who has beneficially owned restricted securities for at least six months, including persons who may be deemed our “affiliates,” as that term is defined under the Securities Act, would be entitled to sell such securities. Sales under Rule 144 are subject to the availability of current public information about the company. A person who has not been our affiliate at any time during the three months preceding a sale, and who has beneficially owned his shares for at least one year, would be entitled under Rule 144 to sell such shares without regard to any limitations under Rule 144.

As of the date of this prospectus, approximately 66,111,472 of our outstanding shares of common stock were eligible for public resale under Rule 144. The sale, or availability for sale, of substantial amounts of common stock could, in the future, adversely affect the market price of the common stock and could impair our ability to raise additional capital through the sale of our equity securities or debt financing. The future availability of Rule 144 to our holders of restricted securities would be conditioned on, among other factors, the availability of certain public information concerning the company.

Transfer Agent

Our transfer agent currently is Stalt, Inc., 671 Oak Grove Avenue, Suite C, Menlo Park, California 94205.

DISCLOSURE OF SEC POSITION ON INDEMNIFICATION

FOR SECURITIES ACT LIABILITIES

Our Articles of Incorporation provides that no officer or director shall be personally liable to this corporation or our stockholders for monetary damages except as provided pursuant to Nevada law. Our Bylaws and Certificate of Incorporation also provide that we shall indemnify and hold harmless each person who serves at any time as a director, officer, employee or agent of the company from and against any and all claims, judgments and liabilities to which such person shall become subject by reason of the fact that he is or was a director, officer, employee or agent of the company and shall reimburse such person for all legal and other expenses reasonably incurred by him or her in connection with any such claim or liability. We also have the power to defend such person from all suits or claims in accord with the Nevada law. The rights accruing to any person under our Bylaws and Articles of Incorporation do not exclude any other right to which any such person may lawfully be entitled, and we may indemnify or reimburse such person in any proper case, even though not specifically provided for by the Bylaws and Articles of Incorporation.

LEGAL MATTERS

TroyGould PC, Los Angeles, California, has rendered an opinion with respect to the validity of the shares of common stock covered by this prospectus.

EXPERTS

Our financial statements as of December 31, 2010 and 2009 and for the years then ended, included in this prospectus, have been audited by Goldman Kurland and Mohidin LLP to the extent and for the periods indicated in their report thereon. Such financial statements have been included in this prospectus and registration statement in reliance upon the reports of Goldman Kurland and Mohidin LLP given on the authority of such firm as experts in auditing and accounting.

WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION

We have filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission a registration statement on Form S-1 under the Securities Act for the common stock offered under this prospectus. We are subject to the informational requirements of the Exchange Act, and file annual, quarterly and current reports and other information with the SEC. These reports and other information filed by ImmunoCellular Therapeutics, Ltd. can be inspected and copied at the Public Reference Room of the SEC at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549 on official business days. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room can be obtained by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC also maintains a Web site at http://www.sec.gov that contains reports, information statements and other information concerning Stratus Media Group, Inc. This prospectus does not contain all the information in the registration statement and its exhibits, which we have filed with the SEC under the Securities Act and to which reference is made. Statements contained in this prospectus as to the contents of any contract or other document referred to are not necessarily complete and in each instance, if such contract or document is filed as an exhibit, reference is made to the copy of such contract or other document filed as an exhibit to such registration statement, each statement being qualified in all respects by such reference. We intend to furnish our stockholders with annual reports containing financial statements audited by our independent registered public accounting firm.

Stratus Media Group, Inc.

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2010 and 2009

Statements of Operations for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009

Statements of Stockholder’s Equity (Deficit) for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009

Statements of Cash Flow for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009

Notes to Audited Financial Statements

Quarterly Financial Statements

Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2011 (Unaudited) and December 31, 2010

Statement of Operations for the three months ended March 31, 2011 (Unaudited) and December 31, 2010

Statements of Cash Flows for the three months ended March 31, 2011 (Unaudited) and December 31, 2010

Notes to Financial Statements (Unaudited)

F-1

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders

Stratus Media Group, Inc.

Santa Barbara, California

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Stratus Media Group, Inc. as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the related statements of operations, stockholders’ equity/(deficit) and cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2010. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of internal control over financial reporting. Our audits considered internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Stratus Media Group, Inc. as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2010 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 2 to the financial statements, the Company has suffered recurring losses and has negative cash flow from operations. These conditions raise substantial doubt as to the ability of the Company to continue as a going concern. These financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from such uncertainty.

/s/ Goldman Kurland Mohidin, LLP

Encino, California

April 25, 2011

F-2

STRATUS MEDIA GROUP, INC.

BALANCE SHEETS

	December 31,
	2010			2009

ASSETS
Current assets
Cash	$	-		$	-
Prepaid expenses		613,150			4,333
Total current assets		613,150			4,333

Deposits		40,494			40,494
Property and equipment, net		10,051			1,798
Intangible assets, net		2,255,688			2,951,098
Goodwill		1,073,345			1,073,345
Acquisition deposits		1,582,809			212,000
Total assets	$	5,575,537		$	4,283,068

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities
Bank overdraft	$	62,796		$	8,260
Accounts payable		903,258			384,951
Deferred salary		330,625			37,500
Accrued interest		310,634			242,284
Accrued expenses - legal judgments		90,732			95,732
Other accrued expenses and other liabilities		1,320,595			859,387
Loans payable to officers and a director		795,939			445,624
Current portion of notes payable to shareholders		465,000			465,000
Notes payable		167,017			142,017
Event acquisition liabilities		483,718			483,718
Total current liabilities		4,930,314			3,164,473

Non-current liabilities
Non-current portion of notes payable to shareholders		625,000			625,000

Total liabilities		5,555,314			3,789,473

Commitments and contingencies

Shareholders’ equity
Series C 10% Preferred Stock, $30.00 par value: 1,000,000		454,799			-
shares authorized, 18,365 and 0 shares outstanding
Series D 10% Preferred Stock, $30.00 par value: 500,000		143,976			-
shares authorized, 5,999 and 0 shares outstanding
Common stock, $0.001 par value: 200,000,000 shares authorized		64,122			58,615
64,122,301 and 58,613,793 shares issued and outstanding
Additional paid-in capital		26,590,681			18,508,762
Stock subscription receivable, net		(749,968	)		-
Accumulated deficit		(26,483,387	)		(18,073,782	)
Total shareholders’ equity		20,223			493,595
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	5,575,537		$	4,283,068

See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.

F-3

STRATUS MEDIA GROUP, INC.

STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

	Year Ended December 31,
	2010			2009


Net revenues	$	40,189		$	-
Cost of revenues		210,393			-
Gross profit		(170,204	)		-

Operating expenses
General and administrative		2,167,840			992,497
Impairment of intangible assets		650,000			640,805
Warrant expense and fair value
charge for stock sales		2,934,040			1,161,593
Legal and professional services		1,665,200			747,168
Depreciation and amortization		49,672			47,204
Total operating expenses		7,466,752			3,589,267

Loss from operations		7,636,956			(3,589,267	)

Other (income)/expenses
Other (income)/expenses		691,260			(311,086	)
Interest expense		81,389			122,917
Total other (income) expenses		772,649			(188,169	)

Net loss	$	8,409,605		$	(3,401,098	)


Basic and diluted loss
per share	$	(0.14	)	$	(0.06	)

Basic and diluted weighted-
average common shares		61,580,154			57,693,157

See Accompanying Notes to Financial Statements

F-4

STRATUS MEDIA GROUP, INC.

STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDER’S EQUITY / (DEFICIT)

	Common Stock						Additional			Accumulated			Subscription			Series C 10%		Series D
	Shares			Amount			Paid-In Capital			Deficit			Receivable			Preferred		Preferred		Total

Balance as of December 31, 2008		57,130,879		$	57,132		$	15,154,541		$	(14,672,684	)	$	(100,000	)					$	438,989

Issuance of common stock for cash		1,100,707			1,100			1,292,900													1,294,000
Value of warrants								388,921													388,921
Stock issued for services		75,770			76			158,149													158,225
Charge for fair value of common stock
above selling price								772,671													772,671
Stock issued to settle amounts owed to
officer of Company		425,836			426			899,961													900,387
Cancellation of stock subscription receivable		(119,399	)		(119	)		(158,381	)					100,000							(58,500	)
Net loss											(3,401,098	)									(3,401,098	)
Balance at December 31, 2009		58,613,793		$	58,615		$	18,508,762		$	(18,073,782	)	$	-						$	493,595

Issuance of common stock for cash		3,474,230			3,474			2,306,526													2,310,000
Issuance of preferred stock for cash								26,945									454,799		143,976		625,720
Value of warrants and options								3,157,233													3,157,233
Stock issued for services		1,198,456			1,197			1,360,796													1,361,993
Stock issued to settle claim		835,822			836			703,644													704,480
Charge for fair value of common stock
above selling price								(223,193	)												(223,193	)
Stock subscription receivable								749,968						(749,968	)
Net loss											(8,409,605	)									(8,409,605	)
Balance at December 31, 2010		64,122,301		$	64,122		$	26,590,681		$	(26,483,387	)	$	(749,968	)	$	454,799	$	143,976	$	20,223

See Accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.

F-5

STRATUS MEDIA GROUP, INC.

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

	Year Ended December 31,
	2010			2009

Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss	$	(8,409,605	)	$	(3,401,098	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss
to net cash used in operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		49,672			47,204
Impairment of intangible assets, net of related liabilities		650,000			640,805
Value of stock issued in excess of value received
and for warrant expense		2,934,040			1,161,593
Stock issued for services		1,361,993			158,149
Stock issued to settle legal disputes		704,480			-
Increase / (decrease) in:
Inventory		-			10,165
Deposits and prepaid expenses		(608,817	)		9,482
Accounts payable		518,307			(8,966	)
Deferred salary		293,125			(163,832	)
Accrued interest		68,350			277,500
Legal judgment		(5,000	)		118,305
Other accrued expenses and liabilities		462,329			217,916
Redemption fund reserve		-			(124,293	)
Net cash used in operating activities		(1,981,126	)		(1,057,070	)

Cash flows from investing activities:
Capital expenditures		(13,636	)		(1,122	)
Advances to acquisition targets		(1,370,809	)		(212,000	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(1,384,445	)		(213,122	)

Cash flows from financing activities:
Bank overdraft		54,536			8,260
Transfer from restricted to operating cash		-			50,023
Proceeds on loans payable to officers and a director		350,315			(30,391	)
Proceeds on notes payable		25,000			(52,500	)
Proceeds from issuance of preferred stock		625,720			-
Proceeds from issuance of common stock		2,310,000			1,294,000
Net cash provided by financing activities		3,365,571			1,269,392

Increase/(Decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		-			(800	)

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period		-			800

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	-		$	-

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Cash paid during the period for interest	$	-		$	-
Cash paid during the period for income taxes	$	-		$	-

Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing and financing activities:
Conversion of accrued interest into common stock	$	-		$	69,442
Conversion of loans, accrued salary, accrued interest and expenses due to
an officer of the company into common stock	$	-		$	900,387

See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements

F-6

STRATUS MEDIA GROUP, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

December 31, 2010 and 2009

(1) Business

On March 14, 2008, pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as August 20, 2007 between Feris International, Inc. (“Feris”) and Pro Sports & Entertainment, Inc. (“PSEI”), Feris issued 49,500,000 shares of its common stock for all of the issued and outstanding shares of PSEI, resulting in PSEI becoming a wholly-owned subsidiary of Feris and the surviving entity for accounting purposes (“Reverse Merger”). In July 2008, Feris’ corporate name was changed to Stratus Media Group, Inc. (“Company”).

PSEI, a California corporation, was organized on November 23, 1998 and specializes in sports and entertainment events that it owns, operates, manages, markets and sells in national markets. PSEI acquired the business of Stratus Rewards, LLC (“Stratus Rewards”) in August 2005 and Stratus Rewards is a wholly-owned subsidiary of PSEI. Stratus Rewards is a credit card rewards program that uses the Visa card platform that offers a unique luxury rewards redemption program, including private jet travel, premium travel opportunities, exclusive events and luxury merchandise. In May 2010, the Company entered into an agreement with a private bank in Switzerland for it to be the processing bank for Stratus Rewards in Europe.

(2) Going Concern

The Company has suffered losses from operations and, without additional capital, currently lacks liquidity to meet its current obligations. The Company had net losses for 2010 and 2009 of $8,409,605 and $3,401,098, respectively. As of December 31, 2010, the Company had negative working capital of $4,317,164 and cumulative losses of $26,483,387. Unless additional financing is obtained, the Company may not be able to continue as a going concern. During 2010, the Company raised $2,935,720 in capital through the issuance of $2,310,000 of common stock and $625,720 of preferred stock. In 2009, the Company raised $1,294,000 in capital through the issuance of common stock. The Company is actively seeking additional capital to establish operations, restart the card and event businesses and complete and integrate targeted acquisitions. However, due to the current economic environment and the Company’s current financial condition, we cannot assure current and future stockholders there will be adequate capital available when needed and on acceptable terms. From January 1, 2011 through April 22, 2011, the Company has raised a total of $1,354,990 in capital from placements of a combination of its Series D Preferred Stock and common stock with warrants.

The financial statements were prepared on a going concern basis which contemplates the realization of assets and the settlement of liabilities in the normal course of business. The financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of asset carrying amounts or the amount and classification of liabilities that might result if the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

(3) Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation

The financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”), pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission “SEC”).

Stock Split

On March 14, 2008, the Board of Directors of the Company approved a 3.5821 for 1.000 forward stock split of the outstanding shares of Stratus’s common stock. The effective date of the stock split was March 14, 2008 and was concurrent with the Reverse Merger. All share and per share information have been adjusted to give effect to the stock split for all periods presented, including all references throughout the financial statements and accompanying notes.

F-7

Use of Estimates

The preparation of our consolidated financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities in our consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Although these estimates are based on our knowledge of current events and actions we may undertake in the future, actual results may differ from such estimates and assumptions.

Event Revenues

Event revenue consists of ticket sales, participant entry fees, corporate sponsorships, advertising, television broadcast fees, athlete management, concession and merchandise sales, charity receipts, commissions and hospitality functions. The Company recognizes admissions and other event-related revenues when the events are held in accordance with SEC Statement Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) 104. Revenues received in advance and related direct expenses pertaining to specific events are deferred until the events are actually held.

Stratus Rewards White Visa Card

Stratus Rewards, the Company’s affiliate redemption credit card rewards program, generates revenues from transaction fees generated by member purchases using the card, and membership fees. Revenue is recognized when transaction fees are received and membership fees are amortized and recognized ratably over the twelve-month membership period from the time of receipt.

Allowance for Uncollectible Receivables

Accounts receivable are recorded at their face amount, less an allowance for doubtful accounts. We review the status of our uncollected receivables on a regular basis. In determining the need for an allowance for uncollectible receivables, we consider our customers financial stability, past payment history and other factors that bear on the ultimate collection of such amounts.

Cash Equivalents

We consider all highly liquid investments purchased with maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents.

Restricted Cash

A portion of each credit card transaction by a card member is deposited into a trust account. This account is used to fund the purchase of goods or services by the card member through redemption of purchasing points. If a card member cancels their card and leaves unclaimed redemption points, the Company is entitled to the cash equivalent of those unclaimed points. With that exception, the cash otherwise is earmarked for member benefits and is not available to the Company for use in operations.

The Company maintains its cash in an account with a major financial institution. Deposits with this financial institution may exceed the amounts of insurance provided on such deposits. The Company has not experienced any losses on its deposits of cash with this financial institution.

F-8

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Our financial instruments include cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivables, accounts payable, a line-of-credit and accrued liabilities. The carrying amounts of financial instruments approximate fair value due to their short maturities.

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. We record depreciation using the straight-line method over the following estimated useful lives:


Equipment	3 – 5 years
Furniture and fixtures	5 years
Software	3 years
Leasehold improvements	Lesser of lease term or life of improvements

Goodwill and Intangible Assets

Intangible assets consist of goodwill related to the Stratus Rewards Visa White Card that we have acquired. Goodwill represents the excess of the cost of an acquired entity over the net amounts assigned to tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed. We apply the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 142 Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, which is codified in FASB ASC Topic 350, which requires allocating goodwill to each reporting unit and testing for impairment using a two-step approach.

The Company purchased several events that are valued on the Company’s balance sheet as intangible assets with a value equal to the consideration paid for such assets, which generally include licensing rights, naming rights, merchandising rights and the right to hold such event in particular geographic locations. There was no goodwill assigned to any of these events and the value of the consideration paid for each event is considered to be the value for each related intangible asset. Each event has separate accounts for tracking revenues and expenses per event and a separate account to track the asset valuation.

The Company reviews the value of intangible assets and related goodwill as part of its annual reporting process, which generally occurs in February or March of each calendar year. In between valuations, the Company conducts additional tests if circumstances warrant such testing. For example, if the Company was unable to secure the services of any sponsoring banks, the Company would then undergo a thorough valuation of the intangible assets related to its Stratus Rewards program.

To review the value of intangible assets and related goodwill, the Company compares discounted cash flow forecasts with the stated value of the assets on the balance sheet.

F-9

These forecasts are discounted at a range of discount rates determined by taking the risk-free interest rate at the time of valuation, plus a premium for equity risk, plus a premium related to small companies in general, plus a risk premium for factors specific to the Company and the business that range from 9.5% for events to 55% for the Stratus Rewards Visa card. The total discount rates ranged from 27% for events, to 69% for athlete management to 79% for the Stratus Rewards program. Terminal values are determined by taking cash flows in year five of the forecast, then applying an annual growth of 2.0% to 2.4% for twenty years and discounting that stream of cash flows by the discount rate used for that section of the business.

If the Company determines that the discount factor for cash flows should be substantially increased, or the event will not be able to being operations when planned, it is possible that the values for the intangible assets currently on the balance sheet could be substantially reduced or eliminated, which could result in a maximum charge to operations equal to the current carrying value of the intangible assets of $3,329,033.

We believe that the events carried as intangible assets on the balance sheet will generate revenues and be profitable because they were profitable when they were acquired by Stratus and the Company has demonstrated that it can operate events in a profitable manner.

The following chart shows each event with an intangible value on the balance sheet as of December 31, 2010 or 2009 and the peak revenue and gross margin that each event achieved prior to acquisition. It should be noted that most events while privately owned tend to commingle business and personal expenses in an attempt to minimize profitability and the attendant tax liability, and that once owned by the Company we have or intend to eliminate those personal expenses in an attempt to maximize profitability.

		Pre- Acquisition Peak Year Results (rounded to nearest thousand)
	Peak Year	Revenues		Gross Margin $		Gross Margin %
Freedom Bowl	1996		3,603,000		607,000		16.8	%
Santa Barbara Concours	2000		880,000		229,000		26.0	%
Beverly Hills Concours	2001		1,304,000		274,000		21.0	%
Core Tour	2002		2,300,000		667,000		29.0	%
Maui Music Festival	2000		923,000		203,000		22.0	%
		$	12,460,000	$	3,681,000

F-10

As of December 31, 2010, the following are the results and assumptions used for the valuation of intangibles assets and goodwill:

			Unaudited
	As of 12/31/2010							Key Forecast Assumptions
											Year		Annual
	Book		Fair		Fair Value			Discount			Revenues		Growth
Event/Item	Balance		Value		As % of Book			Rate			Begin		Rate
Beverly Hills Concours	$	169,958	$	1,819,849		1,071	%		35	%		2011	7	%
Santa Barbara Concours		243,000		2,529,936		1,041	%		35	%		2011	7	%
Core Tour		1,067,069		1,632,755		153	%		35	%		2011	16	%
Freedom Bowl		344,232		983,592		286	%		35	%		2012	7	%
Maui Music		300,000		417,454		139	%		35	%		2012	13	%
Total Events		2,124,259		7,383,586		348	%

Stratus Rewards:
Technology		58,629
Membership list		49,500
Corporate partner list		23,300
Corporate membership		-
Goodwill		1,073,345
Total Stratus Rewards		1,204,774		15,528,253		1,289	%		65	%		2011	171	%
Total Events & Stratus	$	3,329,033	$	22,911,839		688	%

Most events are held during the summer months and require approximately six months of lead time to adequately plan the event. We believe that with the receipt of adequate funding by the second quarter of 2011, we will have more than sufficient time to plan and execute the Beverly Hills Concours and Core Tour in 2011 and Maui Music events in 2012. To allow for the NCAA approval process, we deferred the assumed start of the Freedom Bowl until 2012.

Beverly Hills Concours: The Company plans on running this car show in 2011 and have initiated a number of internal meetings and planning sessions to do so. Revenues in 2011 are forecast at $2,305,000. Revenues are assumed to grow at 7% per year thereafter as the event becomes reestablished and gains in popularity. This event was last operated by the Company in August 2007. In order to allow for ticket revenue and restricted access, Stratus is planning on moving from the Rodeo Drive location used in the past to another venue. The success of the event is dependent on revenues from sponsorship, gated VIP and special events held in conjunction with the event, and entrance fees for vehicles.

Santa Barbara Concours: The Company planned to operate the Santa Barbara Concours in 2009 but had to postpone the event due to venue site problems. The Company ran a limited version of this event in 2010 which generated revenues of $40,189. In 2011, revenues from this event are forecast at $2,181,000. After reestablishing the event, it is assumed to grow at a rate of 7% per year. Depending on the venue selected for the event, the Company may have to obtain local permits, the granting of which cannot be assured.

Core Tour: The Company has been in discussions with the former principals of the Core Tour for them to play active operations management consulting roles to initiate the Core Tour in 2011. This event has not been run since 2004. Revenues are forecast to begin in 2011 at $1,680,000, compared with peak revenues in 2002 of $2,300,000. Revenues are assumed to grow at 16% per year thereafter as the events become established. In addition to the need to obtain local permits to conduct the events, the involvement of the former principals is important for the event to be successfully run, since these principals have extensive knowledge of the market, the venues and the competitors.

F-11

Freedom Bowl: This event was last conducted in 1996, prior to the Company’s acquisition of this event in 1998. The Company plans to begin recertification in 2011 to allow for sufficient time for the National College Athletics Association to recertify this event for 2012 and strategic negotiations with target NCAA Conference alignment. While there is no guarantee that certification will be achieved by 2010, revenues in 2012 are forecast to be $3,124,000, compared with peak revenues in 1996 of $3,603,000. In the event that recertification is not obtained timely, forecasted revenues will be delayed by one year. Revenues are assumed to grow at 7% per year thereafter as the event becomes established. In order to conduct this event successfully, the Company must obtain certification from the NCAA, obtain acceptance and cooperation from the appropriate NCAA Conference(s), obtain a stadium lease, and obtain television coverage with acceptable economics.

Maui Music Festival: this event was last conducted in 2002, prior to its acquisition by the Company in 2003. This event is planned to be restarted in the summer of 2012, with forecast revenues of $620,000, compared with peak revenues in 2000 of $923,000. After restarting the event, revenues are assumed to increase at 13% per annum thereafter. In order to conduct this event successfully, the Company must obtain local permits, engage the appropriate artists to perform and obtain the cooperation of local hotels and tour operators to establish “package” deals for customers to combine attendance at the festival with hotel and vacation planning. At December 31, 2010, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $100,000 against this event.

Stratus Rewards VISA Program: Revenues for 2011 are forecast to be $5,313,000, which is substantially higher than the $517,620 of revenues realized in the 22 months the program was run by Stratus. The limited amount of revenues realized during this 22 month period was largely related to the then-sponsoring bank limiting the acceptance of new cardholders. This is based on the assumption that a new sponsoring bank will activate more users than the passive involvement of the prior bank and resulting failure to process applications shown by the prior sponsoring bank. In order for this effort to be successful, the Company must engage a sponsoring bank and that bank must actively support the Company’s efforts in establishing and expanding this program. In addition, the credit card market is highly regulated and if regulations change in such a manner that restricts the Company’s ability to expand, the value of the intangibles related to the Stratus Rewards VISA program could be adversely affected.

We have hired an experienced bank executive as Vice President of Stratus Rewards with the sole responsibility to obtain one or more new banks as partners in the program and to relaunch the program by 2011. Effective May 14, 2010, Stratus Media Group, Inc. (the “Company”) entered into a Co-branded Card Agreement (the “Agreement”) with Cornèr Banca SA (the “Bank”), located in Lugano, Switzerland. Under the Agreement, the parties agreed to jointly launch a co-branded consumer card payment solution targeted at high net worth individuals and a co-branded commercial payment solution targeted at small and mid-sized businesses. The cards, to be issued by the Bank, will include a loyalty rewards program. The cards are targeted to residents of Europe. The initial term of the Agreement is five years. The Company, among other things, will be responsible for marketing and administration of, and expenses relating to, the rewards program. The Bank will be responsible for issuing the cards. The Company receives a share of purchase transactions generated by a card holder and membership and initiation fees.

F-12

As of December 31, 2010, the Company determined that the $450,000 of value assigned to Stratus Rewards as Corporate Membership was no longer available to the Company and that $100,000 of value assigned to Stratus Rewards proprietary software had been impaired given the availability of commercial software with similar or better functionality. Accordingly, the Company took total impairment charges of $550,000 as of December 31, 2010.

As of December 31, 2009, the Company determined that the seller of the Beverly Hills Concours event could not deliver the vote of the merchants on Rodeo Drive to allow the event to be held there. Because of that determination and the statute of limitations had expired on the ability of the sellers to collect on the remaining portion of the event acquisition liability, the Company eliminated the remaining event acquisition liability and wrote the $430,043 against the Beverly Hills Concours intangible asset, resulting in no net expense. During 2009, a trademark expired relating to the Long Beach Marathon and the Company has elected to not renew the trademark and to no longer plan to conduct this event in the future. Accordingly, an impairment charge of $300,000 was taken in 2009. In addition, the Company determined that $15,000 of intangible assets for athlete management had been impaired and a charge was taken in 2009 for this amount. The fair value for the Maui Music Festival as of December 31, 2009 was determined to be $510,356, which was less than the book value of this asset. Accordingly, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $325,805 to bring the book value for the Maui Music Festival to $400,000. In addition, at December 31, 2010, the Company recorded an additional $100,000 impairment charge related to the Maui Music Festival to bring the book value to $300,000.

Research and Development

Research and development costs not related to contract performance are expensed as incurred. We did not incur any research and development expenses for 2010 or 2009.

Capitalized Software Costs

We did not capitalize any software development costs during the years 2010 or 2009. Costs related to the development of new software products and significant enhancements to existing software products are expensed as incurred until technological feasibility has been established and are amortized over three years.

Valuation of Long-Lived Assets

We account for long-lived assets in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, which is codified in FASB ASC Topic 360, which requires that long-lived assets and certain identifiable intangibles be reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets is measured by comparing the carrying amount of an asset to future undiscounted net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds their fair value. Assets to be disposed of by sale are reflected at the lower of their carrying amount or fair value less cost to sell.

Inventory

Inventory consists of event merchandise valued at the lower of cost (determined on the first-in, first-out basis) or market. If deemed necessary, we will provide reserves for estimated obsolescence or unmarketable inventory equal to the difference between the cost of the inventory and the estimated market value based upon assumptions about future demand and market conditions. We had no inventory reserves at December 31, 2010 or 2009.

F-13

Net Loss Per Share

We compute net loss per share in accordance with SFAS No. 128, Earnings Per Share, which is codified in FASB ASC Topics 260. Basic per share data is computed by dividing loss available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period. Diluted per share data is computed by dividing loss available to common stockholders by the weighted average shares outstanding during the period increased to include, if dilutive, the number of additional common share equivalents that would have been outstanding if potential common shares had been issued using the treasury stock method. Diluted per share data would also include the potential common share equivalents relating to convertible securities by application of the if-converted method.

The effect of common stock equivalents (which include outstanding warrants and stock options) are not included for the years 2010 or 2009, as they are antidilutive to loss per share.

Stock-Based Compensation

Effective January 1 2006, we adopted SFAS No. 123R, Share Based Payment (SFAS No. 123R), which is codified in FASB ASC Topic 718, using the modified prospective transition method. New awards and awards modified, repurchased or cancelled after January 1, 2006 trigger compensation expense based on the fair value of the stock option as determined by the Black-Scholes option pricing model. We amortize stock-based compensation for such awards on a straight-line method over the related service period of the awards taking into account the effects of the employees’ expected exercise and post-vesting employment termination behavior.

We account for equity instruments issued to non-employees in accordance with the provisions of SFAS 123R and EITF Issue No. 96-18.

The risk-free interest rate is based on U.S. Treasury interest rates, the terms of which are consistent with the expected life of the stock options. For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, we granted options to purchase 3,210,000 shares of common stock. There were no option grants in 2009. Future option grants will be calculated using expected volatility based upon the average volatility of our common stock.

Advertising

We expense the cost of advertising as incurred. Such amounts have not historically been significant to our operations.

Income Taxes

The Company utilizes SFAS No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes,” which is codified in FASB ASC Topics 740-10 and 740-30, which requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements or tax returns. Under this method, deferred income taxes are recognized for the tax consequences in future years of differences between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their financial reporting amounts at each year-end based on enacted tax laws and statutory tax rates applicable to the periods in which the differences are expected to affect taxable income. Valuation allowances are established, when necessary, to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized. The provision for income taxes represents the tax payable for the period and the change during the period in deferred tax assets and liabilities.

As of December 31, 2010, the Company had a deferred tax asset of $10,708,426, that was fully reserved and a net operating loss carryforward of approximately $23,402,642 for Federal purposes. The Company will continue to monitor all available evidence and reassess the potential realization of its deferred tax assets. If the Company continues to meet its financial projections and improve its results of operations, or if circumstances otherwise change, it is possible that the Company may release all or a portion of its valuation allowance in the future. Any such release would result in recording a tax benefit that would increase net income in the period the valuation is released.

F-14

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

On February 25, 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-09 Subsequent Events Topic 855 “Amendments to Certain Recognition and Disclosure Requirements,” effective immediately. The amendments in the ASU remove the requirement for an SEC filer to disclose a date through which subsequent events have been evaluated in both issued and revised financial statements. Revised financial statements include financial statements revised as a result of either correction of an error or retrospective application of U.S. GAAP. The FASB believes these amendments remove potential conflicts with the SEC’s literature. The adoption of this ASU had no material impact on the Company’s financial statements.

On March 5, 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-11 Derivatives and Hedging Topic 815 “Scope Exception Related to Embedded Credit Derivatives.” This ASU clarifies the guidance within the derivative literature that exempts certain credit related features from analysis as potential embedded derivatives requiring separate accounting. The ASU specifies that an embedded credit derivative feature related to the transfer of credit risk that is only in the form of subordination of one financial instrument to another is not subject to bifurcation from a host contract under ASC 815-15-25, Derivatives and Hedging — Embedded Derivatives — Recognition. All other embedded credit derivative features should be analyzed to determine whether their economic characteristics and risks are “clearly and closely related” to the economic characteristics and risks of the host contract and whether bifurcation is required. The ASU is effective for the Company on July 1, 2010. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of this ASU will not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In December 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-29, “Disclosure of Supplementary Pro Forma Information for Business Combinations.” This Update amends and clarifies the acquisition date to be used for reporting pro forma financial disclosures when comparative financial statements are presented. In addition it requires a description of the nature of and amount of any material, non-recurring pro forma adjustments directly attributable to the business combination. ASU 2010-29 is effective prospectively for business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2010, with early adoption permitted. The standard will become effective for the Company beginning in January 2011 and will not have an impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations as it only amends required disclosures.

(4) Litigation

In connection with a settlement agreement in May 2005, a judgment was entered in the Superior Court of the County of Los Angeles against PSEI for the previous owners of the “Core Tour” event of $483,718 plus interest. The dispute arose out of the PSEI’s purchase of the “Core Tour” event from the plaintiffs. As of December 31, 2008, the Company recorded the $483,718 judgment. On July 31, 2008, PSEI, the Company and Core Tour agreed to a revised settlement whereby Stratus will retain all rights of the Core Tour events for $483,718 in cash by December 31, 2008 and 74,000 shares of Common Stock as payment of interest. If PSEI is not able to agree on a timetable for payment of the $483,718 and/or is not able to pay the Core Tour parties, the Core Tour parties have the right to enforce their judgment against PSEI in that amount. On December 31, 2008, the Company issued 102,840 shares of our common stock to the owners of the Core Tour as payment for accrued interest on the judgment as of that date. These shares were valued at the $163,516 based on the closing stock price of our common stock, and accrued interest on the books of $172,993 was reversed, with the difference going to other income. On November 2, 2010, the Core Tour parties obtained a levy for the judgment of $483,718 against both PSEI and the Company.

F-15

In February 2006, a former employee filed an action against PSEI and Mr. Feller in Los Angeles Superior Court, alleging breach of employment contract. In October 2006, the court entered a default judgment against the defendants for $363,519 and PSEI recorded a charge and set up a reserve of this amount for the year ended December 31, 2006. In September 2007, PSEI and Mr. Feller filed a motion to set aside the default judgment, which was granted in March 2008. PSEI reversed the reserve of $363,519 during 2008. In May 2008, the plaintiff filed an appeal of the order setting aside the default judgment. In September 2009, the court of appeals affirmed the order setting aside the default judgment, and trial in this matter was set for July 2010. Additionally, in September 2009, the plaintiff amended the complaint to add the Company as a defendant. The jury trial concluded on July 28, 2010 with the jury finding in favor of the Company, PSEI, and Mr. Feller on all counts, except two counts as against PSEI only, requiring payment by PSEI to plaintiff of $20,510. The Company, PSEI, and Mr. Feller will be seeking from plaintiff attorneys’ fees incurred from defending the action.

A former attorney for the Company filed an action against PSEI in Los Angeles County Superior Court seeking to collect allegedly unpaid legal fees in September 2005. Plaintiff purported to effect service on PSEI by service on the California Secretary of State, and on its President by publication. Plaintiff obtained a default judgment in July 2006 for $30,416. In February 2008, PSEI filed a motion to set aside the default judgment, and for leave to defend the action. The motion was denied. This amount is fully reserved on the PSEI’s financial statements, and included in the Company’s financial statements through consolidation, and pursuant to a settlement agreement, a payment of $5,000 was made in 2010.

On July 20, 2010, the Company was served with a summons by a shareholder in the Superior Court of California, Santa Barbara County, alleging breach of fiduciary duty, breach of covenant of good faith and fair dealing and conversion. The summons is seeking a jury trial for declaratory relief of not less than $600,000 and injunctive relief. The Company believes that these claims are without merit and has filed a counterclaim against this shareholder.

In July 2010, Mark Hill, a shareholder of the Company served a demand for arbitration alleging that the Company refused to remove transfer restrictions on shares of Company stock owned by him. The Demand alleges that such refusal constituted breach of contract, implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing and conversion and seeks unspecified compensatory damages, injunctive relief and attorney fees and costs. The Company is defending the claims.

In March 2011, four shareholders of the Company filed an action in Superior Court of California, Santa Barbara County, against the Company, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer and its outside directors. The complaint alleges violations of the California Corporations Code and federal securities laws relating to the issuance of securities to the plaintiffs and breach of fiduciary duty, contract and covenant of good faith and fair dealing and conversion relating to the alleged refusal to allow the plaintiffs to sell their shares. The complaint seeks unspecified compensatory and punitive damages, recovery of attorney fees and costs and certain equitable relief. The Company believes that the claims are without merit and intends to defend the action.

(5) Acquisition of Stratus Rewards

In accordance with the Asset Purchase Agreement dated August 15, 2005, by and between the Company and Stratus Rewards LLC (“Stratus Purchase Agreement”), Stratus acquired the business of Stratus, a credit card rewards program.

F-16

The total consideration for this acquisition was $3,000,000, with Stratus entering into a note payable of $1,000,000 and issuing 666,667 common shares valued at $2,000,000. The note is payable in eight quarterly equal payments over a 24 month period, with the first payment due upon completion of the first post-public merger funding of a minimum amount of $3,000,000.

The Stratus Purchase Agreement which specifically included the transfer to the Company of tangible personal property such as computers and all intellectual property, goodwill associated therewith, licenses and sublicenses. Stratus Rewards had at least $1.4 million of computer hardware and at least $0.2 million of computer software, all of which should have been transferred to the Company pursuant to the Stratus Purchase Agreement. These computer and software assets were not included in the accounting for the acquisition of Stratus Rewards by Pro Sports and the value of the computer hardware and software that was not received was allocated to goodwill. The owner of Stratus Rewards received notice on May 15, 2006 that if he did not deliver this hardware and software within 30 days, that the amount of consideration he was entitled to would be reduced by at least the $1,000,000 amount of the note, if not an additional $1,000,000 value in the common stock issued as consideration. The owner responded on June 2, 2006 that his former law firm owned the computer hardware and software and he did not have the authority to release these items to the Company.

As a result, the Company intends to vigorously dispute the validity of the $1,000,000 note to the former owner and seek to have it canceled.

The results of operations of the business acquired have been included in the Company’s Statements of Operations from the date of acquisition. Depreciation and amortization related to the acquisition were calculated based on the estimated fair market values and estimated useful lives for property and equipment and an independent valuation for certain identifiable intangible assets acquired.

Effective May 14, 2010, Stratus Media Group, Inc. (the “Company”) entered into a Co-branded Card Agreement (the “Agreement”) with Cornèr Banca SA (the “Bank”), located in Lugano, Switzerland. Under the Agreement, the parties agreed to jointly launch a co-branded consumer card payment solution targeted at high net worth individuals and a co-branded commercial payment solution targeted at small and mid-sized businesses. The cards, to be issued by the Bank, will include a loyalty rewards program. The cards are targeted to residents of Europe. The initial term of the Agreement is five years. The Company, among other things, will be responsible for marketing and administration of, and expenses relating to, the rewards program. The Bank will be responsible for issuing the cards. The Company receives a share of purchase transactions generated by a card holder and membership and initiation fees.

(6) Property and Equipment

Property and equipment were as follows:

	December 31,
	2010			2009
Computers and peripherals	$	56,863		$	52,873
Office Machines		20,705			11,058
Furniture and fixtures		56,468			56,468
		134,036			120,399
Less accumulated depreciation		(123,985	)		(118,601	)
	$	10,051		$	1,798

For the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, depreciation expense was $4,262 and $1,793, respectively

F-17

(7) Goodwill and intangible assets

Goodwill and intangible assets were as follows:

	December 31,
	2010		2009

Licensing rights for events	$	2,124,258	$	2,224,258
Goodwill for Stratus Rewards		1,073,345		1,073,345
Identified intangible assets for Stratus Rewards		131,430		726,840
Total intangible assets and goodwill	$	3,329,033	$	4,024,443

Intangible assets of the Company were as follows:

	December 31,
	2010		2009
Intangible Assets
Events
Beverly Hills Concours	$	169,957	$	169,957
Santa Barbara Concours d’Elegance		243,000		243,000
Cour Tour/Action Sports Tour		1,067,069		1,067,069
Freedom Bowl		344,232		344,232
Maui Music Festival		300,000		400,000
Total - Events		2,124,258		2,224,258

Stratus Rewards
Purchased Licensed Technology, net of		58,630		193,240
accumulated amortization of $187,471 and $152,860
Membership List, net of accumulated amortization		49,500		60,300
of $58,500 and $47,700
Corporate Partner List		23,300		23,300
Corporate Membership		-		450,000
Total - Stratus Rewards		131,430		726,840
Total Intangible Assets	$	2,255,688	$	2,951,098

In accordance with ASC Topic 350 “Intangibles - Goodwill and Other” (SFAS 142), the Company’s goodwill and intangible assets, other than the purchased licensed technology and the membership list for Stratus, are considered to have indefinite lives and are therefore no longer amortized, but rather are subject to annual impairment tests. The Company’s annual impairment testing date is December 31, but the Company monitors the facts and circumstances for all intangible properties and will record an impairment if warranted by adverse changes in facts and circumstances.

As of December 31, 2009, the Company determined that the seller of the Beverly Hills Concours event could not deliver the vote of the merchants on Rodeo Drive to allow the event to be held there. Because of that determination and the statute of limitations had expired on the ability of the sellers to collect on the remaining portion of the event acquisition liability, the Company eliminated the remaining event acquisition liability and wrote the $430,043 against the Beverly Hills Concours intangible asset, resulting in no net expense. During 2009, a trademark expired relating to the Long Beach Marathon and the Company has elected to not renew the trademark and to no longer plan to conduct this event in the future. Accordingly, an impairment charge of $300,000 was taken in 2009. In addition, the Company determined that $15,000 of intangible assets for athlete management had been impaired and a charge was taken in 2009 for this amount. The fair value for the Maui Music Festival as of December 31, 2009 was determined to be $510,356, which was less than the book value of this asset. Accordingly, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $325,805 to bring the book value for the Maui Music Festival to $400,000. At December 31, 2010, the Company determined the book value of the Maui Music Festival to be $300,000 and incurred an impairment expense of $100,000 for the year ended December 31, 2010.

F-18

The purchased licensed technology and membership list are being amortized over their estimated useful life of 10 years. For the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, amortization expense was $34,611 and $45,410, respectively. During 2010, the company determined that approximately $100,000 of the purchased technology should be expensed as the value of this technology has decreased at a faster rate than originally estimated at the time of acquisition. In addition, the Company determined that the acquired Corporate Membership should be expensed as this relationship with the Company had discontinued during 2010.

(8)	Deferred Salary

Our president has an employment contract that stipulates an annual salary of $240,000. He has not received payments for salary since prior to 2006 and the $240,000 per year is accrued quarterly. On December 31, 2009 and 2008, our president received shares as payment for accrued salary as of those dates (see footnote 11 for more details). An employee of the Company is currently receiving 50% of his base salary in cash and deferring 50% until certain conditions have been met. As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, deferred salary was $330,625 and $37,500, respectively.

(9)	Accrued expenses – legal judgments

As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, we had $90,732 and $95,732 reserved as Legal Judgments to accrue for a judgment of $65,316 related to amounts due under a consulting contract related to the acquisition of an event, and $30,416 related to allegedly unpaid legal bills from a former attorney for the Company. A payment of $5,000 was made during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010. See Footnote 4 for addition information regarding these amounts.

(10)	Accrued liabilities

Accrued liabilities consisted of the following:

	December 31,
	2010		2009

Professional fees	$	254,244	$	163,207
Travel expenses		202,436		202,436
Consultant’s fees		281,387		63,858
Payroll related		525,864		348,638
Other		56,664		81,248
Total accrued liabilities	$	1,320,595	$	859,387

F-19

(11)	Loans payable to officers and director

The Loans Payable to Officers and a Director represent loans from the Company’s President, an officer and a member of the board of directors and amounted to the following:

	December 31,
	2010		2009

President and director, interest at 9.5%	$	391,993	$	200,000
An officer, non-interest bearing		127,421		130,624
An officer, interest at 5.0% if not repaid on timely basis		231,525		-
A director, interest at 10.0%		45,000		115,000
Total	$	795,939	$	445,624

These loans are unsecured, due on demand, have no priority or subordination features, do not bear any restrictive covenants and contain no acceleration provisions. Interest expense on these loans for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 was $49,398 and $81,862, respectively.

On December 31, 2009, the Company issued 425,836 shares of common stock to the President of the Company as payment of $900,387 for a portion of the loan due to him along with accrued salary, accrued interest and other expenses. The number of shares was determined by dividing the amounts owed by the Volume Weighted Average Price (“VWAP”) for 30 days prior to December 31, 2009.

In connection with the employment agreement for its Senior Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, the Company assumed a promissory note of $231,525 formerly owed to him by ProElite, Inc. and agreed to pay the promissory note with $121,525 payable to him upon the closing of the acquisition of ProElite by the Company, $55,000 due 90 days after the closing of the acquisition, and $55,000 due 180 days after the closing of the acquisition. Any unpaid amounts after 180 days following the closing of the acquisition will bear interest at 5% per annum. The promissory note for $231,525 is included in the Acquisition Deposits account in the Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2010.

In connection with the employment agreement for its Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, the Company agreed to repay approximately $127,421 of past consulting fees and expenses over a 15-month period.

On December 31, 2009, the Company issued 425,836 shares of common stock to the President of the Company as payment of a total of $900,387 for a portion of the loan due to him along with accrued salary, accrued interest and other expenses. The number of shares was determined by dividing the amounts owed by the Volume Weighted Average Price (“VWAP”) for 30 days prior to December 31, 2009. The shares were valued at $958,131 based on the closing price of the common stock on December 31, 2009, and $57,744 was taken as a fair value expense in operating expenses.

F-20

(12)	Notes payable to related parties

Notes Payable to Related Parties consisted of the following:

	December 31,
	2010		2009

To shareholder (unsecured), dated
January 14, 2005, with maturity of May 14, 2005
The principal amount and accrued interest were payable
on May 14, 2005, plus interest at 10% per annum. This
note is currently in default.	$	70,000	$	70,000

To shareholder (unsecured), dated
February 1, 2005, with maturity of June 1, 2005.
The principal amount and accrued interest were payable
on June 1, 2005, plus interest at 10% per annum. This
note is currently in default.		10,000		10,000

To shareholder (unsecured), dated
February 5, 2005, with maturity of June 5, 2005.
The principal amount and accrued interest were payable
on June 5, 2005, plus interest at 10% per annum. This
note is currently in default.		10,000		10,000

To shareholder (unsecured) related to purchase
of Stratus. The note is payable in eight quarterly equal
payments over a 24 month period, with the first payment
due upon completion of the first post-public merger
funding, with such funding to be at a minimum amount
of $3,000,000.		1,000,000		1,000,000
Total		1,090,000		1,090,000
Less: current portion		465,000		465,000
Long-term portion	$	625,000	$	625,000

These notes are unsecured, have no priority or subordination features, do not bear any restrictive covenants and contain no acceleration provisions. The $1,000,000 note related to the purchase of Stratus Rewards does not bear interest. For the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, the Company incurred interest expense on these Notes Payable to Related Parties of $9,000 and $9,000, respectively.

F-21

(13)	Notes payable

Notes Payable consisted of the following:

	December 31,
	2010		2009

To a shareholder (unsecured). Payable on demand
and bears interest at 10%.	$	107,017	$	132,017

To non-shareholder
(unsecured). Payable on demand and
does not bear interest		60,000		10,000

Total (all current)	$	167,017	$	142,017

These notes are unsecured, have no priority or subordination features, do not bear any restrictive covenants and contain no acceleration provisions. For 2010 and 2009, the Company incurred interest expense on these Notes Payable of $19,383 and $15,920, respectively.

(14)	Event acquisition liabilities

At December 31, 2010 and 2009, the Company’s balance sheet reflected an event acquisition liability of $483,718 related to the Core Tour/Action Sports Tour.

(15)	Other income/(expenses)

Net expense in the Current Period was related to a $704,481 expense for the issuance of 835,822 shares of common stock as final settlement of a dispute with a long-term shareholder regarding the number of shares issued pursuant to a subscription agreement executed during 2007. The net gain of $311,086 in the Prior Period reflected a gain of $312,971 on the writeoff for accounts payable related to events that were canceled in 2004 and 2005 and which were past the statute of limitations for collection.

(16)	Related party transactions

From prior to fiscal 2006 through June of 2009, the Company rented office space owned by the Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company. The total rent expense accrued by the Company in 2009 $30,000. The Company believes such rents were at or below prevailing market rates and terminated the rental of this space at the end of June 2009.

During the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, the Company repaid $60,000 and $20,000 on a loan made on January 19, 2005 with an original balance of $125,000 from an individual who became a director of the Company on April 30, 2009. The balance owed to this director at December 31, 2010 is $45,000. This director accrues compensation of $50,000 per annum related to his role as Chairman of the Audit Committee, of which no amounts were paid during the year ended December 31, 2010.

(17)	Shareholders’ Equity

Common Stock

During 2009, the Company raised $1,294,000 through the issuance of 1,100,707 shares of common stock and five-year warrants to purchase 625,000 shares at $2.00. During 2010, Company raised $2,310,000 through the issuance of 3,474,230 of common stock, respectively, and five-year warrants to purchase 1,675,000 shares of common stock at $1.00 to $1.65.

F-22

On December 31, 2009, the Company issued 425,836 shares of common stock to its President as payment of a total of $900,387 for a portion of the loan due to him along with accrued salary, accrued interest and other expenses. The number of shares was determined by dividing the amounts owed by the Volume Weighted Average Price (“VWAP”) for 30 days prior to December 31, 2009.

Series C 10% Preferred Stock

During 2010, the Company issued 18,365 shares of Series C 10% Preferred Stock (“Series C”) for $454,799. Each share of Series C sold for $30, can be converted at any time into 20 shares of common stock and has voting rights equal to 20 shares of common stock. In connection with the issuance of Series C, the Company issued 124,990 warrants with a life of 5 years to purchase a share of common stock for $2.00 per share. The Series C has liquidation preference over common stock at a liquidation value equal to its par value of $30 and pays a cumulative dividend of 10% per year, payable on July 31 and December 31of each year that the Series C is outstanding. Interest payments may be made in cash or in common stock at the discretion of the Company. The Series C automatically convert into 20 shares of common stock when the closing price for a share of common stock is $5.00 or above and the average daily trading volume for the 10 previous trading days is above 200,000 shares. Given the losses recorded by the Company, the stock equivalents related to the Series C are not included in the calculation of earnings per share since the effect of such inclusion would be antidilutive.

Since the Series C contains an embedded conversion feature, the Company performed an analysis of the Series C under ASC 815 “Derivatives and Hedging.” This analysis determined that the embedded conversion feature was not required to be bifurcated and accounted separately from the Series C because the economic risks and characteristics of the embedded conversion feature were clearly and closely related to the economic risks and characteristics of the host contract Series C, namely the risks of the common stock. The value of the beneficial conversion feature was $26,945, which was charged to equity at the time of issuance and was not included in the calculation of earnings per share. The beneficial conversion feature was calculated as the difference of the fair value of the conversion price and the intrinsic value of the preferred shares.

The Series C contains a share adjustment provision that provides for additional shares to be issued if the thirty-day volume weighted average price of the Company’s common stock (“VWAP”) is between $1.00 and $2.00 180 days after the purchase of Series C. If the VWAP is above $2.00, no action is taken. If the VWAP is between $1.00 to $2.00, additional shares are issued to the holder such that the total of the number of common shares issuable upon conversion, which is the number of Series C shares times 20 (“Conversion Shares”), plus the additional shares together equals the VWAP price equals the Conversion Shares times $2.00. If the VWAP is below $1.00 the number of additional shares are calculated as if the price were $1.00, not the actual VWAP. Once this 180-day period passes and the Company has issued the appropriate shares, if any, then Price Protection provisions of this Agreement will expire and the Company will be completely released from any future claims by the Purchaser related to this share adjustment provision.

The Company determined that derivative accounting for the embedded conversion and the share adjustment features were not required pursuant to ASC 815-10-15-74 because the features and the shares are indexed to the company’s own stock under ASC 815-40-15 (EITF Issue 07-5); the features can be classified in shareholders’ equity under ASC 815-40 (EITF Issue 00-19, paragraphs 1-11) and that Series C is classified as a conventional convertible so the embedded conversion feature can be classified in stockholders’ equity under ASC 815-40 (Issue 00-19, paragraphs 12-32). The determination was made by the Company that the Series C is a conventional convertible because the freestanding warrant is indexed to the company’s own stock under ASC 815-40-15 (EITF Issue 07-5); the freestanding warrant is classified in shareholders’ equity under ASC 815-40 (Issue 00-19, paragraphs 1-32); and the financial instrument does not include embedded puts and/or calls or other features that require bifurcation from the host contract under ASC 815.

F-23

Series D 10% Preferred Stock

During 2010, the Company issued 5,999 shares of Series D 10% Preferred Stock (“Series D”) for $170,921. Each share of Series C sold for $30, can be converted at any time into 60 shares of common stock and has voting rights equal to 60 shares of common stock. In connection with the issuance of Series D, the Company issued warrants to purchase 179,970 shares of common stock. The warrants have a life of 5 years to purchase a share of common stock for $1.00 per share. The Series D has liquidation preference over common stock at a liquidation value equal to its par value of $30 and pays a cumulative dividend of 10% per year, payable on July 31 and December 31 of each year that the Series D is outstanding. Interest payments may be made in cash or in common stock at the discretion of the Company. The Series D automatically convert into 60 shares of common stock when the closing price for a share of common stock is $5.00 or above and the average daily trading volume for the 10 previous trading days is above 200,000 shares. Given the losses recorded by the Company, the stock equivalents related to the Series D are not included in the calculation of earnings per share since the effect of such inclusion would be antidilutive.

Since the Series D contains an embedded conversion feature, the Company performed an analysis of the Series C under ASC 815 “Derivatives and Hedging.” This analysis determined that the embedded conversion feature was not required to be bifurcated and accounted separately from the Series D because the economic risks and characteristics of the embedded conversion feature were clearly and closely related to the economic risks and characteristics of the host contract Series D, namely the risks of the common stock. The value of the beneficial conversion feature was $26,945 which was charged to equity at the time of issuance and was not included in the calculation of earnings per share. The beneficial conversion feature was calculated as the difference of the fair value of the conversion price and the intrinsic value of the preferred shares.

The Series D contains a share adjustment provision that provides for additional shares to be issued if the thirty-day volume weighted average price of the Company’s common stock (“VWAP”) is between $0.50 and $1.00 180 days after the purchase of Series D. If the VWAP is above $1.00, no action is taken. If the VWAP is between $0.50 to $1.00, additional shares are issued to the holder such that the total of the number of common shares issuable upon conversion, which is the number of Series D shares times 60 (“Conversion Shares”), plus the additional shares together equals the VWAP price equals the Conversion Shares times $1.00. If the VWAP is below $0.50 the number of additional shares are calculated as if the price were $0.50, not the actual VWAP. Once this 180-day period passes and the Company has issued the appropriate shares, if any, then Price Protection provisions of this Agreement will expire and the Company will be completely released from any future claims by the Purchaser related to this share adjustment provision.

The Company determined that derivative accounting for the embedded conversion and the share adjustment features was not required pursuant to ASC 815-10-15-74 because these features are indexed to the company’s own stock under ASC 815-40-15 (EITF Issue 07-5); the features can be classified in shareholders’ equity under ASC 815-40 (EITF Issue 00-19, paragraphs 1-11) and that Series D is classified as a conventional convertible so the features can be classified in stockholders’ equity under ASC 815-40 (Issue 00-19, paragraphs 12-32). The determination was made by the Company that the Series D is a conventional convertible because the freestanding warrant is indexed to the company’s own stock under ASC 815-40-15 (EITF Issue 07-5); the freestanding warrant is classified in shareholders’ equity under ASC 815-40 (Issue 00-19, paragraphs 1-32); and the financial instrument does not include embedded puts and/or calls or other features that require bifurcation from the host contract under ASC 815.

Stock Options

During 2010, the Company issued options to purchase 3,210,000 shares of common stock in connection with a consulting agreement. The Black Scholes value of these options was $1,012,977, which is being amortized over the respective vesting periods. These options have a strike price of $1.50 to $3.50 per share and a five-year life. The following assumptions were used for the Black Scholes calculations to determine these expenses:

F-24

Range of estimated fair value of underlying common stock	$	0.50 - $2.54
Remaining life		5.0
Range of risk-free interest rates		1.18% - 2.51	%
Range of expected volatilities		89% - 106	%
Dividend yield		-

The following table sets forth the activity of our stock options to purchase common stock:

	Options Outstanding							Options Exercisable
					Weighted				Weighted
					Average	Weighted			Average	Weighted
					Remaining	Average			Remaining	Average
	Options		Range of		Life in	Exercise		Options	Life in	Exercise
	Outstanding		Exercise Prices		Years	Price		Exercisable	Years	Price
As of December 31, 2008	7,067,852		$	0.14-$0.84	3.3	$	0.19	8,033,913	2.7	$	0.19
Forfeited	(8,000	)				$	0.43
Exercised
Granted
As of December 31, 2009	7,059,852		$	0.14 - $1.50	2.0	$	0.43	6,397,352	1.7	$	0.31
Forfeited	-			-	-		-	-	-		-
Exercised	-			-	-		-	-	-		-
Granted	3,210,000		$	1.50 - $3.50	4.0	$	2.03	2,115,332	4.0	$	2.03
As of December 31, 2010	10,269,852		$	0.14 - $3.50	2.4	$	0.94	8,512,684	2.0	$	0.94

Warrants

During 2005, the Company granted warrants with rights to purchase $36,250 of its common stock. These warrants have terms of five years and the exercise prices for these warrants will be the share prices applicable in the next Company financing after March 2008. The warrants expire by December 31, 2010 and the exercise prices for these warrants and the number of shares for such warrants are to be determined by the share price used in such financing. The Company valued these warrants, using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, at December 31, 2009 at $0 and included this liability in other accrued expenses and other liabilities.

Since this Company financing event has not occurred, the number of shares and the purchase price related to these warrants could not be determined as of December 31, 2009. The Company analyzed these warrants in accordance with EITF pronouncement No. 00-19, “Accounting for Derivative Financial Instruments Indexed to, and Potentially Settled in, a Company’s Own Stock”. The Company determined that the warrants should be classified as a liability based on the fact that the number of shares attributable to these warrants is indeterminate.

These warrants were granted as financing costs related to notes payable agreements with two shareholders and one non-shareholder. The warrants are accounted for as financing costs which were capitalized and amortized over the five-year life of the debt. There was no related amortization expense in 2009 or 2010.

F-25

Since the number of shares and the purchase price related to these warrants can’t be determined, which in turn prevents a determination of the Black Scholes value of these warrants and consequent determination of the charge to the income statement, if any, for the periods ending on those dates.

During 2010, the Company issued warrants to purchase 2,408,626 shares of common stock in connection with the sale of common stock. These warrants have a strike price in the range of $1.00 to 2.00 per share, vest upon issuance and a life of five years. The Black Scholes expense for these options was $1,012,977, which was recorded in operating expenses. There are no repricing or antidilution features for any these warrants. The Black-Scholes expenses for the warrants issued during 2010 were calculated using the following assumptions:

Range of estimated fair value of underlying common stock	$	1.01 - $1.80
Range of remaining lives (in years)		4.6 - 5.0

Range of risk-free interest rates		2.04% - 2.62	%
Range of expected volatilities		101% - 106	%
Dividend yield		-

The following table sets forth the activity of our warrants to purchase common stock. This presentation does not includes warrants to purchase 1,350,000 shares held by members of our board of directors that were previously presented as part of the warrants section of this footnote, but have been moved to the options section above. This change was made since warrants for directors are accounted for in the same manner as options to employees under ASC 505 (FAS 123R), and the Company therefore believes that it is preferable to present pools of options and warrants with identical accounting treatment within each pool. Of these 1,350,000 shares of director’s warrants now presented with options, 487,500 were vested as of September 30, 2010 and both the outstanding and vested warrants had an average life of 4.0 years and an average strike price of $1.50. The opening balances as of December 31, 2009 were restated to conform to this revised presentation.

F-26

A summary of the warrants:

	Warrants Outstanding						Warrants Exercisable
				Weighted					Weighted
				Average	Weighted				Average		Weighted
				Remaining	Average				Remaining		Average
	Warrants	Range of		Life in	Exercise		Warrants		Life in		Exercise
	Outstanding	Exercise Prices		Years	Price		Exercisable		Years		Price
As of December 31, 2008	64,050	$	2.00	3.5	$	2.00		64,050		3.5	$	2.00
Forfeited	-		-	-		-		-		-		-
Exercised	-		-	-		-		-		-		-
Granted	-		-	-		-		-		-		-
As of December 31, 2009	64,050	$	2.00	3.5	$	2.00		64,050		3.5	$	2.00
Forfeited	-		-	-		-		-		-		-
Exercised	-		-	-		-		-		-		-
Granted	2,408,626	$	1.00 - $2.00	4.8	$	1.35		2,408,626		4.8	$	1.35
As of December 31, 2010	2,472,676	$	1.00 - $2.00	4.4	$	1.37		2,472,676		4.4	$	1.37

(18)	Commitments and contingencies

Office space rental

On May 1, 2009, the Company entered into a lease for approximately 1,800 square feet of office space in Santa Barbara, California for use as its executive offices. This lease was amended on July 21, 2009 and expires on December 31, 2013 with a three-year renewal term available at an initial rent plus common area charges of $5,767 per month.

From May 2008 to June 2009, our corporate headquarters were located in West Hollywood, California, where we leased approximately 2,600 square feet of space which is used for our corporate headquarters, general administrative functions, and sales and marketing efforts at $8,500 a month from April 1, 2008 to October 31, 2008, and $11,400 per month from November 1, 2008 until we vacated the lease in May 2009. Subsequent to our departure from the premises, the Company settled with the landlord to pay $90,000 to terminate the lease. To date, we have paid $60,000.

From prior to January 1, 2008 until May 2009, we leased approximately 1,800 square feet of space in Santa Barbara, California, for executive use at $4,000 per month under a lease expiring December 31, 2010.

Rent expense for 2010 and 2009 was $92,194 and $135,643, respectively.

F-27

Contractual obligations

Set forth below is information concerning our known contractual obligations as of December 31, 2010 that are fixed and determinable by year.

									After
	Total		2011		2012		2013		2013
Debt obligations*	$	1,000,000	$	375,000	$	500,000	$	125,000	$	-
Other debt obligations		547,017		547,017		-		-		-
Event acquisition liabilities		483,718		483,718		-		-		-
Legal Judgments		90,732		90,732		-		-		-
Rent obligations		207,612		69,204		69,204		69,204		-
Total	$	2,329,079	$	1,565,671	$	569,204	$	194,204	$	-

*	Debt incurred in connection with acquisition of Stratus. Repayment is triggered by first funding of at least $3,000,000. For purposes of this schedule such funding is assumed to occur by June 30, 2011.

Employment Agreements

The Company has an Employment Agreement (“Agreement”), dated January 1, 2007, with its President and Chief Executive Officer, which requires the Company to offer a non-qualified stock option to purchase 10% of the fully diluted shares of the Company’s capital stock issued and outstanding on January 1, 2007, the effective date of the Agreement. The stock option has a term of five years at an exercise price of $1.79 per share for 4,862,894 shares and vested immediately on the date of the agreement. This stock option is subject to a customary anti-dilution provision with respect to any stock splits, mergers, reorganizations and other such events. The length of this Agreement is five years from the effective date unless the employment is terminated for another cause. During the duration of this Agreement, the Chief Executive Officer is entitled to an annual salary of $240,000 and a bonus of $250,000 in the event a Valuing Event causes the Company to be valued in excess of $100,000,000 and an additional bonus of $500,000 in the event a Valuing Event causes the Company to be valued in excess of $500,000,000. For the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and the year ended December 31, 2008, no bonuses have been paid by the Company in relation to this Agreement. Pursuant to a written modification of this agreement on October 30, 2009, the President agreed the Valuing Event could only occur after January 1, 2010 and waived any right to claim a bonus related to a Valuing Event prior to January 1, 2010.

On November 1, 2010, the Company entered into an employment agreement with John Moynahan, who has been providing accounting and financial services to the Company as a consultant pursuant to a consulting agreement dated November 14, 2007. Under the agreement, which needs to be ratified by the Company’s board of directors, Mr. Moynahan will receive an annual salary of $220,000 and will be eligible for bonuses based on objectives established by the Company’s board of directors and Mr. Moynahan’s performance against those objectives. Under this agreement, Mr. Moynahan will receive a grant of 300,000 shares and a five-year stock option grant to purchase 1,560,000 shares of common stock at $2.00 per share, with 1,040,000 shares that vested upon the signing of the agreement and 520,000 shares that will vest on September 1, 2011. Such options shall terminate forty-five (45) days after the Executive’s employment with the Company is terminated if such termination is for Cause or is the result of a resignation by Executive for reasons other than Good Reason. Such options shall not be assignable by Executive. Each option described above shall be subject to customary anti-dilution provision with respect to any stock splits, mergers, reorganizations or other such events. In addition, the Company agreed to repay approximately $127,000 in amounts due to Mr. Moynahan under his consulting agreement over a 15-month term.

On February 22, 2010, the Company entered into an employment contract with William Kelly, the Company’s Senior Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, and the Chief Operating Officer of ProElite, Inc. Under the agreement, Mr. Kelly will receive an annual salary of $240,000 and shall be eligible for bonuses based on objectives established by the Company’s board of directors and Mr. Kelly’s performance against those objectives. The proposed agreement further provides that Mr. Kelly will receive a grant of options to purchase 1,200,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, with a five-year life, a strike price of $2.00 the following vesting schedule: 396,000 shares vest immediately, 396,000 shares vest on October 1, 2010 and 408,000 shares will vest on October 1, 2011. Such options shall terminate forty-five (45) days after the Executive’s employment with the Company is terminated if such termination is for Cause or is the result of a resignation by Executive for reasons other than Good Reason. Such options shall not be assignable by Executive. Each option described above shall be subject to customary anti-dilution provision with respect to any stock splits, mergers, reorganizations or other such events. In connection with Mr. Kelly’s employment, the Company assumed a promissory note of $231,525 formerly owed to Mr. Kelly by ProElite, Inc. and agreed to pay the promissory note with $121,525 payable to Mr. Kelly upon the closing of the acquisition of ProElite by the Company, $55,000 due 90 days after the closing of the acquisition, and $55,000 due 180 days after the closing of the acquisition.

F-28

(19)	Segment Information

Each event and the Stratus Reward program is considered an operating segment pursuant to ASC Topic 280 “Segment Reporting” (SFAS 131) since each is budgeted separately and results of each event and the Stratus program are tracked separately to provide the chief operating decision maker information to assess and manage each event and the Stratus Program.

The characteristics of the Stratus Reward program are different than the events, so that operating segment is considered a reporting segment. The events share similar economic characteristics and are aggregated into a reporting segment pursuant to paragraph 17 of SFAS 131. All of the events provide entertainment and the logistics and production processes and methods for each event are similar: sponsorship sales, ticket and concession sales, security, stages, public address systems and the like. While the demographic characteristics of the audience can vary by event, all events cater to consumer entertainment.

A summary of results by segments is as follows:

	As of/for the Year ended December 31, 2010												As of /for the Year ended December 31, 2009
	Stratus												Stratus
	Credit Card			Events			Other			Total			Credit Card			Events		Other			Total
Revenues	$	-		$	40		$	-		$	40		$	-		$	-	$	-		$	-
Cost of sales		-			210			-			210			-			-		-			-
Gross margin		-			(170	)		-			(170	)		-			-		-			-
Deprec. & Amort		45			-			5			50			45			-		2			47
Segment loss		(45	)		(170	)		(5	)		(220	)		(45	)		-		(2	)		(47	)
Operating expenses		-			-			7,418			7,418			-			-		3,542			3,542
Other expenses		-			-			772			772			-			-		(188	)		(188	)
Net loss	$	(45	)	$	(170	)	$	(8,195	)	$	(8,410	)	$	(45	)	$	-	$	(3,356	)	$	(3,401	)

Assets	$	1,216		$	2,124		$	2,235		$	5,575		$	1,800		$	2,224	$	259		$	4,283
Liabilities	$	1,000		$	484		$	4,071		$	5,555		$	1,000		$	484	$	2,306		$	3,790

F-29

(20)	Income taxes

Significant components of the Company’s deferred tax assets for federal income taxes consisted of the following:

	December 31,
	2010			2009
Net operating loss carryforward	$	9,807,531		$	6,211,935
Amortization		(774,682	)		(580,145	)
Stock option compensation		904,334			904,334
Deferred compensation		1,009,369			883,794
Deferred state tax		(742,052	)		(492,181	)
Other		501,926			449,208
Valuation allowance		(10,706,426	)		(7,376,945	)
Net deferred tax asset	$	-		$	-

The Company had net operating loss carry-forwards (“NOL”) for federal and state income tax purposes of approximately:

	December 31,
	2010		2009
Combined NOL:
Federal	$	23,402,642	$	15,009,560
California		20,934,758		12,541,676

The net operating loss carry-forwards begin expiring in 2020 and 2011, respectively. The utilization of net operating loss carry-forwards may be limited due to the ownership change under the provisions of Internal Revenue Code Section 382 and similar state provisions. The Company recorded a 100% valuation allowance on the deferred tax assets at December 31, 2010 and 2009 because of the uncertainty of their realization.

A reconciliation of the income tax credit computed at the federal statutory rate to that recorded in the financial statements for 2010 and 2009 is as follows:

	December 31, 2010					December 31, 2009
Rate reconciliation:
Federal credit at statutory rate		(2,848,201	)	98.0	%		(1,156,373	)	39.8	%
State tax, net of Federal benefit		(486,478	)	16.7	%		(198,807	)	6.8	%
Change in valuation allowance		2,594,840		(89.3	%)		1,352,449		(46.5	%)
Other		739,839		(25.5	%)		2,731		(0.1	%)
Total provision		0		0.0	%		0		0.0	%

(21)	ProElite, Inc.

Effective October 21, 2009, the Company entered into a Strategic Investment Agreement (“SIA”) with ProElite, Inc. (“PEI”) pursuant to which PEI agreed to sell to the Company, and the Company agreed to purchase from PEI, shares of PEI’s Series A Preferred Stock (the “Preferred Shares”). The Preferred Shares are convertible into Common Stock of PEI. The amount of shares of Common Stock issuable upon conversion on a cumulative basis is equal to 95% of the sum of (a) the issued and outstanding shares of PEI as of the closing plus (b) any shares of PEI Common Stock issued after the closing upon exercise or conversion of any derivative securities of PEI outstanding as of the closing, subject to any adjustment for stock splits, stock dividends, recapitalizations etc. and, in all cases, after giving effect to the shares issuable upon conversion of the Preferred Shares. The purchase price of the Preferred Shares is $2,000,000 which will be used by PEI for payment of outstanding liabilities of PEI, general working capital and other corporate purposes and repayment of all amounts due under a note of PEI with respect to advances made to PEI by the Company of $100,000. Closing of the purchase of the Preferred Shares is subject to certain conditions. Upon closing, all of the current directors of PEI will resign and the board of directors of PEI will consist of two designees of the Company and one designee of PEI. Paul Feller, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, will become PEI’s Chief Executive Officer. Certain present and former key PEI executives will continue with PEI.

F-30

On February 4, 2010, the Company entered into an Amendment to the SIA (the “Amendment”), dated as of January 26, 2010, with PEI pursuant to which the parties amended the terms of the SIA entered into between PEI and the Company dated October 21, 2009. The Amendment (i) provides for certain interim funding by the Company to PEI prior to the closing, and contains representations regarding the Company’s ability to provide all funds necessary to perform its obligations under the SIA and the Amendment, (ii) extends the outside date for the Closing to March 31, 2010, (iii) conditionally provides for changes in the board and management of PEI, subject to the Company’s timely compliance with delivery of specified payments to PEI and third parties (the “Management Change”), (iv) credits against the Purchase Price certain expenses and amounts already loaned by the Company, (v) provides for the convertibility of amounts previously loaned into Preferred Stock of PEI on a pro-rata basis, (v) provides that all of the conditions to closing in Section 6.1 of the Agreement, have been satisfied to date and that, notwithstanding such conditions (other than the condition regarding legal compliance and certain ministerial conditions), the Company is unconditionally obligated to consummate the purchase and other transactions contemplated by the SIA and the Amendment and pay the full Purchase Price (applying such credits as provided in the Amendment), (vi) provides for a guarantee of certain obligations of the Company, (vii) provides for an enforcement mechanism independent of the newly appointed board and management until the Closing and (viii) provides for application of certain post-closing covenants to the interim period.

On March 30, 2010, the Company entered into Amendment number 2 to the SIA, which provided for an extension of the closing date to May 14, 2010 under the terms and conditions of the SIA and the previous Amendment, and required the Company to continue to fund the operations of PEI and the auditors of PEI. On May 12, 2010, the Company entered into Amendment number 3 to the SIA, which extended the closing date to September 30, 2010 under the terms and conditions of the SIA and the previous amendments, and required the Company to continue to fund the operations of PEI and all parties associated with the audit of PEI. On September 29, 2010, the Company entered into Amendment number 4 to the SIA, which extended the closing date to July 31, 2010 under the terms and conditions of the SIA and the previous amendments (see footnote 21 “Subsequent events”). On July 30, 2010, the Company entered into Amendment number 5 to the SIA, which extended the closing date to October 31, 2010 under the terms and conditions of the SIA and the prior amendments and required the Company to make a defined payment to legal counsel for PEI. On October 30, 2010, the Company entered into Amendment number 6 to the SIA, which extended the closing date to November 30, 2010. The Company entered into Amendment number 7 to the SIA, which extended the closing date to March 31, 2011. The Company has verbally agreed to extend the closing date April 30, 2011.

(22)	Subsequent Events

From January 1, 2011 through April 22, 2011, the Company has raised a total of $1,354,990 in capital from placements of a combination of its Series D Preferred Stock and common stock with warrants.

F-31

PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

STRATUS MEDIA GROUP, INC.

BALANCE SHEETS

	March 31,			December 31,
	2011			2010
	(Unaudited)
ASSETS
Current assets
Cash and equivalents	$	-		$	-
Deposits and prepaid expenses		540,208			653,644
Total current assets		540,208			653,644
Property and equipment, net		8,025			10,051
Intangible assets, net		2,244,335			2,255,688
Goodwill for Stratus Rewards Card		1,073,345			1,073,345
Acquisition deposit		1,582,809			1,582,809
Total assets	$	5,448,722		$	5,575,537
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)
Current liabilities
Bank overdraft	$	164,990		$	62,796
Accounts payable		1,053,458			903,258
Deferred salary		398,928			330,625
Accrued interest		347,446			310,634
Accrued expenses - legal judgments		90,732			90,732
Other accrued expenses and other liabilities		1,507,670			1,320,595
Loans payable to officers and a director		867,658			795,939
Current portion of notes payable - related parties		465,000			465,000
Notes payable		167,017			167,017
Event acquisition liabilities		483,718			483,718
Total current liabilities		5,546,617			4,930,314

Non-current liabilities
Non-current portion of notes payable - related parties		625,000			625,000

Total liabilities		6,171,617			5,555,314

Commitments and contingencies

Shareholders’ equity (deficit)
Series C 10% Preferred stock, $0.001 par value: 1,000,000 shares		12			18
authorized 11,699 and 18,365 shares issued and outstanding
Series D 10% Preferred Stock, $0.001 par value: 500,000 shares		15			6
authorized 14,999 and 5,999 shares issued and outstanding
Common stock, $0.001 par value: 200,000,000 shares authorized		64,256			64,122
64,255,621 and 64,122,301 shares issued and
outstanding, respectively
Additional paid-in capital		27,937,436			27,189,432
Stock subscription receivable		(549,968	)		(749,968	)
Accumulated deficit		(28,174,646	)		(26,483,387	)
Total shareholders’ equity (deficit)		(722,895	)		20,223
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity (deficit)	$	5,448,722		$	5,575,537

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

F-32

STRATUS MEDIA GROUP, INC.

STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(UNAUDITED)

	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2011			2010


Operating expenses
General and administrative	$	879,780		$	305,120
Warrant and option expense		501,126			648,551
Legal and professional services		280,090			230,564
Depreciation and amortization		13,379			11,883
Total operating expenses		1,674,375			1,196,118

Loss from operations		(1,674,375	)		(1,196,118	)

Other expenses
Other expense		3,190			525,378
Interest expense		36,813			14,747
Total other expenses		40,003			540,125

Net loss	$	(1,714,378	)	$	(1,736,243	)


Basic and diluted loss
per share	$	(0.03	)	$	(0.03	)

Basic and diluted weighted-
average common shares		64,220,069			59,086,939

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

F-33

STRATUS MEDIA GROUP, INC.

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(UNAUDITED)

	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2011			2010

Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss	$	(1,714,378	)	$	(1,736,243	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss
to net cash used in operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		13,379			11,883
Non-cash expense for warrants and options		501,126			648,551
Stock issued for services		-			54,275
Stock issued to settle legal dispute		-			525,378
Increase / (decrease) in:
Deposits and prepaid expenses		(63,905	)		(50,000	)
Accounts payable		150,200			(31,982	)
Deferred salary		68,303			75,625
Accrued interest		36,812			13,217
Accrued expenses - legal judgment		-			(5,000	)
Other accrued expenses and other liabilities		436,269			137,853
Net cash used in operating activities		(572,194	)		(356,444	)

Cash flows from investing activities:
Advances to acquisition target		-			(406,613	)
Net cash used by investing activities		-			(406,613	)

Cash flows from financing activities:
Bank overdraft		102,194			(8,260	)
Payments on loans payable to officers and a director		-			(68,212	)
Payments on notes payable		-			(25,000	)
Proceeds from issuance of preferred stock		270,000			-
Proceeds from issuance of common stock		200,000			1,330,000
Net cash provided by financing activities		572,194			1,228,528

Net change in cash and equivalents		-			465,472

Cash and equivalents, beginning of period		-			-

Cash and equivalents, end of period	$	-		$	465,472

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Cash paid during the period for interest	$	-		$	-
Cash paid during the period for income taxes	$	-		$	-

Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing and financing activities:
Conversion of preferred stock into common stock	$	198,980		$	-

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

F-34

STRATUS MEDIA GROUP, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

MARCH 31, 2011 (UNAUDITED) and DECEMBER 31, 2010

1. Business

PSEI, a California corporation, was organized on November 23, 1998 and specializes in sports and entertainment events that it owns, operates, manages, markets and sells in national markets. PSEI acquired the business of Stratus Rewards, LLC (“Stratus Rewards”) in August 2005 and Stratus Rewards is a wholly-owned subsidiary of PSEI. Stratus Rewards is a credit card rewards program using the Visa card platform that offers a luxury rewards redemption program, including private jet travel, premium travel opportunities, exclusive events and luxury merchandise. In May 2010, the Company entered into an agreement with a private bank in Switzerland for it to be the processing bank for Stratus Rewards in Europe.

2. Going Concern

The Company has suffered losses from operations and, without additional capital, currently lacks liquidity to meet its current obligations. The Company has a net loss for 2010 of $8,409,605 and a net loss of $1,714,378 for the three months ended March 31, 2011. As of March 31, 2011, the Company had negative working capital of $5,006,409 and cumulative losses of $28,174,646. Unless additional financing is obtained, the Company may not be able to continue as a going concern. During 2010, the Company raised $2,935,720 in capital through the issuance of $2,310,000 of common stock and $625,720 of preferred stock. The Company raised $270,000 in capital through issuance of preferred stock and $200,000 from the receipt of a stock subscription receivable during the three months ended March 31, 2011. The Company is actively seeking additional capital to establish operations, restart the credit card and event businesses and complete and integrate targeted acquisitions. During the period April 1, 2011 through May 14, 2011, the Company raised additional funds of $1,045,000 through the issuance of 2,612,500 shares of common stock. The Company believes this financing coupled with future positive cash flow from operations should result in the future removal of the going concern qualification of the audit opinion similar to the one rendered by our independent auditors for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010.

3. Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation

F-35

Use of Estimates

Event Revenues

Stratus Rewards White Visa Card

Stratus Rewards, the Company’s affiliate redemption credit card rewards program intends to generate revenues from transaction fees generated by member purchases using the card, and membership fees. Revenue will be recognized when transaction fees are received and membership fees are amortized and recognized ratably over the twelve-month membership period from the time of receipt.

Cash Equivalents

We consider all highly liquid investments purchased with maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Our financial instruments include cash and equivalents, accounts payable, a line-of-credit and accrued liabilities. The carrying amounts of financial instruments approximate fair value due to their short maturities.

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. We record depreciation using the straight-line method over the following estimated useful lives:


Equipment		3 – 5 years
Furniture and fixtures		5 years
Software		3 years
Leasehold improvements		Lesser of lease term or life of improvements

Goodwill and Intangible Assets

Intangible assets consist of goodwill related to certain events and the Stratus Rewards Visa White Card that we acquired. Goodwill is the excess of the cost of an acquired entity over the net amounts assigned to tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed. We apply the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 142 Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets , codified in FASB ASC Topic 350, which requires allocating goodwill to each reporting unit and testing for impairment using a two-step approach.

F-36

The Company purchased several events that are recorded on the Company’s balance sheet as intangible assets with a value at the consideration paid for such assets, which generally include licensing rights, naming rights, merchandising rights and the right to hold such event in particular geographic locations. There was no goodwill assigned to any of these events and the value of the consideration paid for each event is considered to be the value for each related intangible asset. Each event has separate accounts for tracking revenues and expenses per event and a separate account to track the asset valuation.

To review the value of intangible assets and related goodwill, the Company compares discounted cash flow forecasts with the amounts of the assets on the balance sheet.

These forecasts are discounted at a range of discount rates determined by taking the risk-free interest rate at the time of valuation, plus premiums for equity risk and small companies in general, and factors specific to the Company and its business.

If the Company determines the discount factor for cash flows should be substantially increased, or the event will not be able to being operations when planned, it is possible that the amounts for the intangible assets currently on the balance sheet could be reduced or eliminated, which could result in a maximum charge to operations equal to the current carrying value of the intangible assets of $3,317,680.

The Company believes that Core Tour and Maui Music Festival are most at risk for additional impairment charges in the future because the fair value for each event is less than 200% of the book value for such events.

Research and Development

Research and development costs not related to contract performance are expensed as incurred. We did not incur any research and development expenses for 2010 or the three months ended March 31, 2011.

Capitalized Software Costs

We did not capitalize any software development costs during 2010 or the three months ended March 31, 2011. Costs related to the development of new software products and significant enhancements to existing software products are expensed as incurred until technological feasibility has been established and are amortized over three years.

F-37

Valuation of Long-Lived Assets

We account for long-lived assets in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, codified in FASB ASC Topic 360, which requires that long-lived assets and certain identifiable intangibles be reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets is measured by comparing the carrying amount of an asset to future undiscounted net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds their fair value. Assets to be disposed of by sale are reflected at the lower of their carrying amount or fair value less cost to sell.

Net Loss Per Share

We compute net loss per share in accordance with SFAS No. 128, Earnings Per Share, codified in FASB ASC Topics 260. Basic per share data is computed by dividing loss available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period. Diluted per share data is computed by dividing loss available to common stockholders by the weighted average shares outstanding during the period increased to include, if dilutive, the number of additional common share equivalents that would have been outstanding if potential common shares had been issued using the treasury stock method. Diluted per share data would also include the potential common share equivalents relating to convertible securities by application of the if-converted method.

The effect of common stock equivalents (which include outstanding warrants and stock options) are not included for the three months ended March 31, 2011 or 2010, as they are antidilutive to loss per share.

Stock-Based Compensation

We adopted SFAS No. 123R, Share Based Payment (SFAS No. 123R), codified in FASB ASC Topic 718, using the modified prospective transition method. New awards and awards modified, repurchased or cancelled after January 1, 2006 trigger compensation expense based on the fair value of the stock option as determined by the Black-Scholes option pricing model. We amortize stock-based compensation for such awards on a straight-line method over the related service period of the awards taking into account the effects of the employees’ expected exercise and post-vesting employment termination behavior.

We account for equity instruments issued to non-employees in accordance with the provisions of SFAS 123R and EITF Issue No. 96-18.

The risk-free interest rate is based on U.S. Treasury interest rates, the terms of which are consistent with the expected life of the stock options. Future option grants will be calculated using expected volatility based upon the average volatility of our common stock.

Advertising

We expense the cost of advertising as incurred. Such amounts have not historically been significant to our operations.

Income Taxes

F-38

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In January 2010, FASB issued ASU No. 2010-06, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820): Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements. This update provides amendments to ASC Topic 820 that will provide more robust disclosures about (1) the different classes of assets and liabilities measured at fair value, (2) the valuation techniques and inputs used, (3) the activity in Level 3 fair value measurements and (4) the transfers between Levels 1, 2, and 3. This standard is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009, except for the disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements in the roll forward of activity in Level 3 fair value measurements. Those disclosures are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010, and for interim periods within those fiscal years. The adoption of this ASU did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.

On March 5, 2010, FASB issued ASU No. 2010-11, Derivatives and Hedging Topic 815: Scope Exception Related to Embedded Credit Derivatives. This ASU clarifies the guidance within the derivative literature that exempts certain credit related features from analysis as potential embedded derivatives requiring separate accounting. The ASU specifies that an embedded credit derivative feature related to the transfer of credit risk that is only in the form of subordination of one financial instrument to another is not subject to bifurcation from a host contract under ASC 815-15-25, Derivatives and Hedging – Embedded Derivatives – Recognition. All other embedded credit derivative features should be analyzed to determine whether their economic characteristics and risks are “clearly and closely related” to the economic characteristics and risks of the host contract and whether bifurcation is required. The ASU was effective for the Company on July 1, 2010. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of this ASU did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In April 2010, FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2010-13, Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Effect of Denominating the Exercise Price of a Share-Based Payment Award in the Currency of the Market in Which the Underlying Equity Security Trades. This update provides amendments to Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 718 to clarify that an employee share-based payment award with an exercise price denominated in the currency of a market in which a substantial portion of the entity’s equity securities trades should not be considered to contain a condition that is not a market, performance or service condition. Therefore, an entity would not classify such an award as a liability if it otherwise qualifies as equity. The amendments in this update are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15, 2010. The amendments in this update should be applied by recording a cumulative-effect adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings. The cumulative-effect adjustment should be calculated for all awards outstanding as of the beginning of the fiscal year in which the amendments are initially applied, as if the amendments had been applied consistently since the inception of the award. The cumulative-effect adjustment should be presented separately. Earlier application is permitted. The adoption of this ASU did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In December 2010, FASB issued ASU No. 2010-28, Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): When to Perform Step 2 of the Goodwill Impairment Test for Reporting Units with Zero or Negative Carrying Amounts. The amendments in this update affect all entities that have recognized goodwill and have one or more reporting units whose carrying amount for purposes of performing Step 1 of the goodwill impairment test is zero or negative. The amendments in this update modify Step 1 so that for those reporting units, an entity is required to perform Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test if it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists. In determining whether it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists, an entity should consider whether there are any adverse qualitative factors indicating that an impairment may exist. The qualitative factors are consistent with existing guidance, which requires that goodwill of a reporting unit be tested for impairment between annual tests if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount. The amendments in this update are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2010. Early adoption is not permitted. Upon adoption of the amendments, any resulting goodwill impairment should be recorded as a cumulative-effect adjustment to beginning retained earnings in the period of an adoption. Any goodwill impairments occurring after the initial adoption of the amendments should be included in earnings. The Company adopted this ASU on January 1, 2011. The adoption of this ASU did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.

F-39

In December 2010, FASB issued ASU No. 2010-29, Business Combinations (Topic 805): Disclosure of Supplementary Pro Forma Information for Business Combinations. The amendments in this update specify that if a public entity presents comparative financial statements, the entity should disclose revenue and earnings of the combined entity as though the business combination(s) that occurred during the current year had occurred as of the beginning of the comparable prior annual reporting period only. The amendments also expand the supplemental pro forma disclosures to include a description of the nature and amount of material, nonrecurring pro forma adjustments directly attributable to the business combination included in the reported pro forma revenue and earnings. The amendments in this update are effective prospectively for business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2010. The Company adopted this ASU on January 1, 2011. As of March 31, 2011, the Company has not entered into any business combination transactions.

4. Litigation

In connection with a settlement agreement in May 2005, a judgment was entered in the Superior Court of the County of Los Angeles (“LASC”) against PSEI for the previous owners of the “Core Tour” event of $483,718 plus interest. The dispute arose out of the PSEI’s purchase of the “Core Tour” event from the plaintiffs. As of December 31, 2008, the Company recorded the $483,718 judgment. On July 31, 2008, PSEI, the Company and Core Tour agreed to a revised settlement whereby Stratus will retain all rights of the Core Tour events for $483,718 in cash by December 31, 2008 and 74,000 shares of Common Stock as payment of interest. If PSEI is not able to agree on a timetable for payment of the $483,718 and/or is not able to pay the Core Tour parties, the Core Tour parties have the right to enforce their judgment against PSEI in that amount. On December 31, 2008, the Company issued 102,840 shares of our common stock to the owners of the Core Tour as payment for accrued interest on the judgment as of that date. These shares were valued at the $163,516 based on the closing stock price of our common stock, and accrued interest on the books of $172,993 was reversed, with the difference going to other income. On November 2, 2010, the Core Tour parties obtained a levy for the judgment of $483,718 against PSEI.

In February 2006, a former employee filed an action against PSEI and Mr. Feller in LASC, alleging breach of employment contract. In October 2006, the court entered a default judgment against the defendants for $363,519 and PSEI recorded a charge and set up a reserve of this amount for the year ended December 31, 2006. In September 2007, PSEI and Mr. Feller filed a motion to set aside the default judgment, which was granted in March 2008. PSEI reversed the reserve of $363,519 during 2008. In May 2008, the plaintiff filed an appeal of the order setting aside the default judgment. In September 2009, the court of appeals affirmed the order setting aside the default judgment, and trial in this matter was set for July 2010. Additionally, in September 2009, the plaintiff amended the complaint to add the Company as a defendant. The jury trial concluded on July 28, 2010 with the jury finding in favor of the Company, PSEI, and Mr. Feller on all counts, except two counts as against PSEI only, requiring payment by PSEI to plaintiff of $20,510. The Company, PSEI, and Mr. Feller will be seeking reimbursement of attorneys’ fees incurred from defending the action from plaintiffs.

In connection with a consulting contract related to the acquisition of an event, the consultant obtained an arbitration award, by default, against PSEI in August 2005 for $65,316 in LASC. In September 2005, the plaintiff filed a petition against the Company to confirm the Award against PSEI. In January 2006, the court entered a judgment on the Award and in October 2007, PSEI filed a motion to set aside the Judgment on the basis of lack of service. In November 2007, the court denied the motion to set aside the Judgment. PSEI recorded an expense of $65,316 in 2007 and fully reserved this amount.

F-40

A former attorney for the Company filed an action against PSEI in LASC seeking to collect allegedly unpaid legal fees in September 2005. Plaintiff purported to effect service on PSEI by service on the California Secretary of State, and on its President by publication. Plaintiff obtained a default judgment in July 2006 for $30,416. In February 2008, PSEI filed a motion to set aside the default judgment, and for leave to defend the action. The motion was denied. This amount is fully reserved on the PSEI’s financial statements, and included in the Company’s financial statements through consolidation, and pursuant to a settlement agreement, a payment of $5,000 was made in 2010.

On July 20, 2010, the Company was served with a summons by a shareholder in the Superior Court of California, Santa Barbara County, alleging breach of fiduciary duty, breach of covenant of good faith and fair dealing and conversion. The summons is seeking a jury trial for declaratory relief of not less than $600,000 and injunctive relief. The Company believes these claims are without merit and has filed a counterclaim against this shareholder.

In July 2010, Mark Hill, a shareholder of the Company served a demand for arbitration alleging the Company refused to remove transfer restrictions on shares of Company stock owned by him. The Demand alleges that such refusal constituted breach of contract, implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing and conversion and seeks unspecified compensatory damages, injunctive relief and attorney fees and costs. The Company is defending the claims.

In March 2011, four shareholders of the Company filed an action in Superior Court of California, Santa Barbara County, against the Company, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer and its outside directors. The complaint alleges violations of the California Corporations Code and federal securities laws relating to the issuance of securities to the plaintiffs and breach of fiduciary duty, contract and covenant of good faith and fair dealing and conversion relating to the alleged refusal to allow the plaintiffs to sell their shares. The complaint seeks unspecified compensatory and punitive damages, recovery of attorney fees and costs and certain equitable relief. The Company believes the claims are without merit and intends to defend the action.

5. Acquisition of Stratus Rewards

The total consideration for this acquisition was $3,000,000, with Stratus issuing a note of $1,000,000 and issuing 666,667 common shares valued at $2,000,000. The note is payable in eight quarterly equal payments over a 24 month period, with the first payment due upon completion of the first post-public merger funding of a minimum amount of $3,000,000.

F-41

As a result, the Company intends to vigorously dispute the validity of the $1,000,000 note to the former owner and seek to have it canceled.

6. Property and Equipment

Property and equipment were as follows:

	March 31,			December 31,
	2011			2010
Computers and peripherals	$	56,863		$	56,863
Office Machines		20,705			20,705
Furniture and fixtures		56,468			56,468
		134,036			134,036
Less accumulated depreciation		(126,011	)		(123,985	)
	$	8,025		$	10,051

For the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, depreciation expense was $2,027 and $530, respectively.

F-42

7. Goodwill and Intangible assets

Intangible assets of the Company were as follows:

	March 31,		December 31,
	2011		2010
Intangible Assets
Events
Beverly Hills Concours	$	169,957	$	169,957
Santa Barbara Concours d’Elegance		243,000		243,000
Cour Tour/Action Sports Tour		1,067,069		1,067,069
Freedom Bowl		344,232		344,232
Maui Music Festival		300,000		300,000
Total - Events		2,124,258		2,124,258

Stratus Rewards
Purchased Licensed Technology, net of		49,977		58,630
accumulated amortization of $161,513 and $152,860
Corporate Partner List, net of accumulated amortization		46,800		49,500
of $50,400 and $47,700
Member List		23,300		23,300
Total - Stratus Rewards		120,077		131,430
Total Intangible Assets	$	2,244,335	$	2,255,688

In accordance with SFAS No. 142, codified in FASB ASC Topic 350, the Company’s intangible assets, other than the purchased licensed technology and the membership list for Stratus, are considered to have indefinite lives and are therefore no longer amortized, but rather are subject to annual impairment tests. The Company’s annual impairment testing date is December 31, but the Company monitors the facts and circumstances for all intangible properties and will record impairment if warranted by adverse changes in facts and circumstances.

The purchased licensed technology and membership list are being amortized over their estimated useful life of 10 years. For the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, amortization was $11,353 and $11,353, respectively.

8. Deferred Salary

Our president has an employment contract that stipulates an annual salary of $240,000. He has not received cash payments for salary since prior to 2006 and the $240,000 per year is accrued on a quarterly basis. As of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, deferred salary was $398,928 and $330,625, respectively.

9. Accrued expenses – legal judgments

As of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, we had $90,732 as Accrued expenses – legal judgments to accrue for a judgment of $60,316 for amounts due under a consulting contract related to the acquisition of an event, and $30,416 related to allegedly unpaid legal bills from a former attorney for the Company. A payment of $5,000 was made during the three months ended March 31, 2010. See Footnote 4 for addition information regarding these amounts.

F-43

10. Accrued liabilities

Accrued liabilities consisted of the following:

	March 31,		December 31,
	2011		2010

Professional fees	$	295,940	$	254,244
Travel expenses		202,436		202,436
Consultant fees		403,118		281,387
Payroll tax liabilities		502,028		525,864
Other		104,148		56,664
	$	1,507,670	$	1,320,595

11. Loans payable to officers and a director

The Loans Payable to Officers and a Director represents a loan from the Company’s President and a member of the board of directors and amounted to the following:

	March 31		December 31,
	2011		2010

President and director, interest at 9.5%	$	463,712	$	391,993
An officer, non-interest bearing		127,421		127,421
An officer, interest at 5.0% if not repaid on timely basis		231,525		231,525
A director, interest at 10.0%		45,000		45,000
	$	867,658	$	795,939

These loans are unsecured, due on demand, have no priority or subordination features, do not bear any restrictive covenants and contain no acceleration provisions. Interest expense on loans to officers and a director for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 was $12,421 and $6,934, respectively.

F-44

12. Notes payable to related parties:

Notes Payable to Related Parties consisted of the following:

	March 31,		December 31,
	2011		2010

To shareholder (unsecured), dated
January 14, 2005, with maturity of May 14, 2005
The principal amount and accrued interest were payable
on May 14, 2005, plus interest at 10%. This
note is currently in default.	$	70,000	$	70,000

To shareholder (unsecured), dated
February 1, 2005, with maturity of June 1, 2005.
The principal amount and accrued interest were payable
on June 1, 2005, plus interest at 10%. This
note is currently in default.		10,000		10,000

To shareholder (unsecured), dated
February 5, 2005, with maturity of June 5, 2005.
The principal amount and accrued interest were payable
on June 5, 2005, plus interest at 10%. This
note is currently in default.		10,000		10,000

To shareholder (unsecured) related to purchase
of Stratus. The note is payable in eight quarterly equal
payments over a 24 month period, with the first payment
due upon completion of the first post-public merger
funding, with such funding to be at a minimum amount
of $3,000,000.		1,000,000		1,000,000
		1,090,000		1,090,000
Less: current portion		465,000		465,000
Long-term portion	$	625,000	$	625,000

These notes are unsecured, have no priority or subordination features, do not bear any restrictive covenants and contain no acceleration provisions. Per contract, the $1,000,000 note related to the purchase of Stratus Rewards bears interest at 10%. However, as noted in Footnote 5, the Company intends to vigorously pursue the cancellation of this note and therefore, the Company is not accruing interest on this note. For the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, the Company incurred interest expense on this Notes Payable to Related Parties of $2,250 and $2,250, respectively.

F-45

13. Notes payable

Notes Payable consisted of the following:

	March 31,		December 31,
	2011		2010

To a shareholder (unsecured). Payable on demand
and bears interest at 10%.	$	107,017	$	107,017

To non-shareholders
(unsecured). Payable on demand and
does not bear interest		60,000		60,000

Total (all current)	$	167,017	$	167,017

These notes are unsecured, have no priority or subordination features, do not bear any restrictive covenants and contain no acceleration provisions. For the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, the Company incurred interest expense on these Notes Payable of $3,378 and $3,378, respectively.

14. Event acquisition liabilities

The Event acquisition liabilities refer to the amount the Company owes to the principals of the Core Tour/Action Sports Tour pursuant to a legal judgment in their favor for this amount.

15. Related party transactions

During 2010, the Company repaid $60,000 on a loan made on January 19, 2005 with an original balance of $125,000 from an individual who became a director of the Company on April 30, 2009. The balance owed to this director at December 31, 2010 is $45,000. This director accrues compensation of $50,000 per annum related to his role as Chairman of the Audit Committee, of which no amounts were paid during 2010. The Company did not repay any amounts due to this director during the first quarter ended March 31, 2011.

16. Shareholders’ Deficit

Series C 10% Preferred Stock

F-46

During the quarter ended March 31, 2011, a shareholder converted 6,666 shares of Series C 10% preferred stock into 133,320 shares of common stock.

Series D 10% Preferred Stock

During the quarter ended March 31, 2011, the Company issued 9,000 shares of Series D 10% Preferred Stock (“Series D”) for $270,000. During 2010, the Company issued 5,999 shares of Series D for $170,921. Each share of Series C sold for $30, can be converted at any time into 60 shares of common stock and has voting rights equal to 60 shares of common stock. In connection with the issuance of Series D, the Company issued warrants to purchase 179,970 shares of common stock. The warrants have a life of 5 years to purchase a share of common stock for $1.00 per share. The Series D has liquidation preference over common stock at a liquidation value equal to its par value of $30 and pays a cumulative dividend of 10% per year, payable on July 31 and December 31 of each year that the Series D is outstanding. Interest payments may be made in cash or in common stock at the discretion of the Company. The Series D automatically convert into 60 shares of common stock when the closing price for a share of common stock is $5.00 or above and the average daily trading volume for the 10 previous trading days is above 200,000 shares. Given the losses recorded by the Company, the stock equivalents related to the Series D are not included in the calculation of earnings per share since the effect of such inclusion would be antidilutive.

F-47

Common Stock

During 2010, the Company raised $2,310,000 through the issuance of 3,474,230 of common stock and five-year warrants to purchase 1,675,000 shares of common stock, respectively, at $1.00 to $1.65. During the quarter ended March 31, 2011, the Company raised $200,000 from the receipt of a stock subscription receivable.

F-48

Stock Options

During the three months ended March 31, 2011, the Company did not issue options.

The following table sets forth the activity of our stock options to purchase common stock:

	Options Outstanding								Options Exercisable
					Weighted
					Average		Weighted			Weighted
					Remaining		Average			Average
	Options		Range of		Life in		Exercise		Options	Exercise
	Outstanding		Exercise Prices		Years		Price		Exercisable	Price
As of December 31, 2010		10,269,852	$	0.14 - $3.50		2.4	$	0.94	8,512,684	$	0.94
Forfeited		-		-		-		-	-		-
Exercised		-		-		-		-	-		-
Granted		-		-		-		-	-		-
As of March 31, 2011		10,269,852				2.4	$	0.94	8,512,684	$	0.94

Warrants

During the three months ended March 31, 2011, the Company issued warrants to purchase 270,000 shares of common stock in connection with the sale of common stock. These warrants have a strike price of $1.00 per share, vest upon issuance and have a life of five years. The Black Scholes expense for these options was $102,849, which was recorded in operating expenses. There are no repricing or antidilution features for any of these warrants. The Black-Scholes expenses for the warrants issued during the three months ended March 31, 2011 was calculated using the following assumptions:

Range of estimated fair value of underlying common stock	$	1.65 - $1.75
Range of remaining lives (in years)		4.9 - 5.0
Range of risk-free interest rates		2.48% - 2.62	%
Range of expected volatilities		103% - 106	%
Dividend yield		-

F-49

A summary of the warrants:

	Warrants Outstanding								Warrants Exercisable
					Weighted
					Average		Weighted			Weighted
					Remaining		Average			Average
	Warrants		Range of		Life in		Exercise		Warrants	Exercise
	Outstanding		Exercise Prices		Years		Price		Exercisable	Price
As of December 31, 2010		2,472,676	$	1.00 - $2.00		4.4	$	1.35	2,472,676	$	1.35
Forfeited		-		-		-		-	-		-
Exercised		-		-		-		-	-		-
Granted		270,000	$	1.00		4.9		1.00	270,000		1.00
As of March 31, 2011		2,742,676	$	1.50 - $2.00		4.5	$	1.34	2,742,676	$	1.34

17. Commitments and contingencies

Office space rental

From prior to January 1, 2008 until May 2009, we leased approximately 1,800 square feet of space in Santa Barbara, California, for executive use at $4,000 per month under a lease which expired December 31, 2010.

Rent expense for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 was $18,091 and $46,200, respectively.

18. Segment Information

Each event and the Stratus Reward program is considered an operating segment pursuant to ASC 280 since each is budgeted separately and results of each event and the Stratus program are tracked separately to provide the chief operating decision maker information to assess and manage each event and the Stratus Program.

The characteristics of the Stratus Reward program are different than the events, so that operating segment is considered a reporting segment. The events share similar economic characteristics and are aggregated into a reporting segment pursuant to paragraph 17 of ASC 280. All of the events provide entertainment and the logistics and production processes and methods for each event are similar: sponsorship sales, ticket and concession sales, security, stages, public address systems and the like. While the demographic characteristics of the audience can vary by event, all events cater to consumer entertainment.

F-50

A summary of results by segment is as follows:

	(Amounts in $000)
	As of/for the Three Months ended March 31, 2011											As of /for the Three Months ended March 31, 2010
	Stratus											Stratus
	Credit Card			Events		Other			Total			Credit Card			Events		Other			Total
Revenues	$	-		$	-	$	-		$	-		$	-		$	-	$	-		$	-
Cost of sales		-			-		-			-			-			-		-			-
Gross margin		-			-		-			-			-			-		-			-
Deprec. & Amort		15			-		-			15			12			-		-			12
Segment profit (loss)		(15	)		-		-			(15	)		(12	)		-		-			(12	)
Operating expenses		-			-		1,659			1,659			-			-		1,184			1,184
Other expenses		-			-		40			40			-			-		540			540
Net income (loss)	$	(15	)	$	-	$	(1,699	)	$	(1,714	)	$	(12	)	$	-	$	(1,724	)	$	(1,736	)

Assets	$	1,216		$	2,124	$	2,109		$	5,449		$	1,789		$	2,224	$	1,482		$	5,495
Liabilities	$	1,000		$	484	$	4,688		$	6,172		$	1,000		$	484	$	2,621		$	4,105

19. ProElite, Inc.

Effective October 21, 2009, the Company entered into a Strategic Investment Agreement with ProElite, Inc. (“PEI”) pursuant to which PEI agreed to sell to the Company, and the Company agreed to purchase from PEI, shares of PEI’s Series A Preferred Stock (the “Preferred Shares”). The Preferred Shares are convertible into the Common Stock of PEI. The amount of shares of Common Stock issuable upon conversion on a cumulative basis is equal to 95% of the sum of (a) the issued and outstanding shares of PEI as of the closing plus (b) any shares of PEI Common Stock issued after the closing upon exercise or conversion of any derivative securities of PEI outstanding as of the closing, subject to any adjustment for stock splits, stock dividends, recapitalizations etc. and, in all cases, after giving effect to the shares issuable upon conversion of the Preferred Shares. The purchase price of the Preferred Shares is $2,000,000 which will be used by PEI for payment of outstanding liabilities of PEI, general working capital and other corporate purposes and repayment of all amounts due under a note of PEI with respect to advances made to PEI by the Company of $100,000. Closing of the purchase of the Preferred Shares is subject to certain conditions. Upon closing, all of the current directors of PEI will resign and the board of directors of PEI will consist of two designees of the Company and one designee of PEI. Paul Feller, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, will become PEI’s Chief Executive Officer. Certain present and former key PEI executives will continue with PEI.

F-51

20. Subsequent Events

During the period April 1, 2011 through August 1, 2011, the Company raised additional funds of $12,228,965 consisting of: $869,965 through issuance of 28,999 shares of Series D Preferred Stock and warrants to purchase 869,965 shares of common stock; $2,659,000 through issuance of 7,597,141 shares of common stock and warrants to purchase 11,395,712 shares of common stock; and $8,700,000 through issuance of 8,700 shares of Series E Preferred stock and warrants to purchase 32,625,000 shares of common stock.

F-52

PART II – INFORMATION NOT REQUIRED IN PROSPECTUS

ITEM 13. OTHER EXPENSES OF ISSUANCE AND DISTRIBUTION

We estimate that expenses in connection with the distribution described in this registration statement (other than brokerage commissions, discounts or other expenses relating to the sale of the shares by the selling stockholders) will be as set forth below. We will pay all of the expenses with respect to the distribution, and such amounts, with the exception of the Securities and Exchange Commission registration fee, are estimates.

SEC registration fee	$	3,492
Accounting fees and expenses	$	10,000
Legal fees and expenses	$	25,000
Printing and related expenses	$	15,000
Total	$	53,492

ITEM 14. INDEMNIFICATION OF DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS

Our Articles of Incorporation provides that no officer or director shall be personally liable to this corporation or our stockholders for damages for breach of fiduciary duty as a director or officer involving any act or omission of any such officer or director. The foregoing does not eliminate or limit liability for acts or omissions involving intentional misconduct, fraud or an intentional violation of law or wrongful payment of dividends pursuant to Nevada law. Our Bylaws also provide that we shall indemnify and hold harmless each person who serves at any time as a director, officer, employee or agent of the company from and against any and all expenses, fines, judgments and liabilities to which such person shall become subject by reason of the fact that he is or was a director, officer, employee or agent of the company and shall reimburse such person for all legal and other expenses reasonably incurred by him or her in connection with any such claim or liability. We also have the power to defend such person from all suits or claims in accord with the Nevada law. In certain cases, we may advance expenses incurred in defending any such proceeding. The rights accruing to any person under our Bylaws and Articles of Incorporation do not exclude any other right to which any such person may lawfully be entitled, and we may indemnify or reimburse such person in any proper case, even though not specifically provided for by the Bylaws and Articles of Incorporation.

Insofar as indemnification for liabilities for damages arising under the Securities Act of 1933 may be permitted to our directors, officers, and controlling persons pursuant to the foregoing provision, or otherwise, we have been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and is, therefore, unenforceable.

ITEM 15. RECENT SALES OF UNREGISTERED SECURITIES

Series E Preferred Stock and Warrants

Effective May 25, 2011 the Company sold to eight accredited investors an aggregate of 8,700 Series E Preferred Shares, A Warrants to purchase an aggregate of 21,750,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock and B Warrants to purchase an aggregate of 10,875,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock. The Company received gross proceeds of $8,700,000. The Company paid $800,000 in commissions and agreed to issue warrants to the placement agent to purchase an aggregate of 3,600,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock with respect to the private placement, at an exercise price of $0.65 per share. The Company also paid a broker-dealer a commission in connection with the private placement of $100,000 in cash and agreed to issue such broker-dealer five year warrants to purchase 1,000,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock, at an exercise price of $0.65 per share.

II-1

Common Stock and Warrants

From April 15, 2011 to July 22, 2011, the Company sold to 79 accredited investors 7,597,141 Units, each Unit consisting of (a) one share of Common Stock of the Company, (b) one warrant to purchase a share of Common Stock, with an exercise price of $0.60 per share, and (c) one-half of a warrant to purchase a share of Common Stock with an exercise price of $1.00 per share. The purchase price per Unit was $0.35 and the Company received $2,659,000 in proceeds. No commissions were paid.

Series C and D Preferred Stock and Warrants

From May 26, 2010 to May 9, 2011, the Company sold to nine accredited investors an aggregate of 18,365 shares of Series C Preferred Stock (convertible into 367,293 shares of Common Stock), 50,665 shares of Series D Preferred Stock (convertible into 3,039,870 shares of Common Stock) and 2,300,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock, together with warrants to purchase an aggregate of 2,853,582 shares of the Company’s Common Stock with exercise prices of $2.00 per share for the Series C Preferred offering and $1.00 per share for the Series D Preferred offering and Common Stock offering. The Company received gross proceeds of $3,220,875 and paid approximately $480,000 in commissions to placement agents. A more detailed description of the terms of the Series C and Series D Preferred Stock, including the price protection provisions, is contained in the notes to the Company’s financial statements included in the Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011.

All of the above securities were not registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Act”) in reliance upon the exemption from registration contained in Section 4(2) of the Act and Regulation D promulgated thereunder.

ITEM 16. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

Exhibit Index

Exhibit No.		Exhibit Description

3.1		Restated Articles of Incorporation of Titan (incorporated by reference from Form 10-SB (Film No. 98648988) filed by Titan with the Commission on June 16, 1998).

3.2		By-Laws of Titan as amended and restated on September 10, 1999 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed October 1, 1999).

4.16*		Certificate of Designations of the Series C Convertible Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.01 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 27, 2011).

4.17		Certificate of Designations of the Series D Convertible Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.02 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 27, 2011).

4.18		Certificate of Designations of the Series E Convertible Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.03 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 27, 2011).

5.1		Opinion of Troy Gould PC.*

10.62		Amendment to Agreement and Plan of Merger between Pro Sports & Entertainment, Inc. and Feris International, Inc. dated March 10, 2008 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed March 14, 2008).

10.63		Employment Agreement between Pro Sports & Entertainment, Inc. and Paul Feller dated January 1, 2007 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed March 14, 2008).

10.67		Strategic Investment Agreement between Stratus Media Group, Inc. and ProElite, Inc. dated October 9, 2009 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed October 22, 2009).

10.68		Amendment to Strategic Investment Agreement between Stratus Media Group, Inc. and ProElite, Inc. dated January 11, 2010 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed February 26, 2010).

10.69		Employment Agreement between Stratus Media Group, Inc. and William Kelly dated February 22, 2010.

10.70		Employment Agreement between Stratus Media Group, Inc. and John Moynahan dated November 1, 2010. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.70 to the Company’s Report on Form 10-K filed on April 26, 2011).

23.1		Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.*

23.2		Consent of Troy Gould PC (included in Exhibit 5.1).

II-2

ITEM 17. UNDERTAKINGS

The undersigned Registrant hereby undertakes:

(1) To file, during any period in which offers or sales are being made, a post-effective amendment to this registration statement to:

(i) To include any prospectus required by Section 10(a)(3) of the Securities Act.

(ii) To reflect in the prospectus any facts or events arising after the effective date of the registration statement (or the most recent post-effective amendment thereof) which, individually or in the aggregate, represent a fundamental change in the information set forth in the registration statement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any increase or decrease in volume of securities offered (if the total dollar value of securities offered would not exceed that which was registered) and any deviation from the low or high end of the estimated maximum offering range may be reflected in the form of prospectus filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Rule 424(b) if, in the aggregate, the changes in volume and price represent no more than a 20% change in the maximum aggregate offering price set forth in the “Calculation of Registration Fee” table in the effective registration statement; and

II-3

(iii) To include any material information with respect to the plan of distribution not previously disclosed in the registration statement or any material change to such information in the registration statement;

(2) That, for the purpose of determining any liability under the Securities Act, each such post-effective amendment shall be deemed to be a new registration statement relating to securities offered therein, and the offering of the securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof;

(3) To remove from registration by means of a post-effective amendment any of the securities being registered which remain unsold at the termination of the offering;

(4) That, for the purpose of determining liability under the Securities Act to any purchaser, each prospectus filed pursuant to Rule 424(b) as part of a registration statement relating to an offering, other than registration statements relying on Rule 430B or other than prospectuses filed in reliance on Rule 430A, shall be deemed to be part of and included in the registration statement as of the date it is first used after effectiveness. Provided, however, that no statement made in a registration statement or prospectus that is part of the registration statement or made in a document incorporated or deemed incorporated by reference into the registration statement or prospectus that is part of the registration statement will, as to a purchaser with a time of contract of sale prior to such first use, supersede or modify any statement that was made in the registration statement or prospectus that was part of the registration statement or made in any such document immediately prior to such date of first use.

Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act may be permitted to directors, officers and controlling persons of the registrant pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, the registrant has been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other than the payment by the registrant of expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer or controlling person of the registrant in the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such director, officer or controlling person in connection with the securities being registered, the registrant will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue.

II-4

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the Registrant has duly caused this registration statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, in Los Angeles, California, on August 12, 2011.

	STRATUS MEDIA GROUP, INC.

	By:		/s/ Paul Feller
			Paul Feller
			President and Chief Executive Officer

POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each individual whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Paul Feller his true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent with full power of substitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign any and all amendments (including post-effective amendments) to this registration statement, and to sign any registration statement for the same offering covered by this registration statement that is to be effective on filing pursuant to Rule 462(b) promulgated under the Securities Act and all post-effective amendments thereto, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto and all documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of the, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents or any of them, or his or their substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act, this registration statement has been signed by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated:

Signature	Title	Date

/s/ Paul Feller	President, Chief Executive Officer and	August 12, 2011
Paul Feller	Director (Principal Executive Officer)

/s/ John Moynahan	Chief Financial Officer (Principal	August 12, 2011
John Moynahan	Financial Officer)

/s/ Charles Bearchell	Chief Accounting Officer (Principal	August 12, 2011
Charles Bearchell	Accounting Officer)

/s/ Glenn Golenberg	Director	August 12, 2011
Glenn Golenberg

/s/ Randall Cross	Director	August 12, 2011
Randall Cross

/s/ Michael Dunleavy, Sr.	Director	August 12, 2011
Michael Dunleavy, Sr.

/s/ Jerry Rubinstein	Director	August 12, 2011
Jerry Rubinstein

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit No.		Exhibit Description

3.1		Restated Articles of Incorporation of Titan (incorporated by reference from Form 10-SB (Film No. 98648988) filed by Titan with the Commission on June 16, 1998).

3.2		By-Laws of Titan as amended and restated on September 10, 1999 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed October 1, 1999).

4.16		Certificate of Designations of the Series C Convertible Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.01 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 27, 2011).

4.17		Certificate of Designations of the Series D Convertible Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.02 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 27, 2011).

4.18		Certificate of Designations of the Series E Convertible Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.03 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 27, 2011).

5.1		Opinion of Troy Gould PC.*

10.62		Amendment to Agreement and Plan of Merger between Pro Sports & Entertainment, Inc. and Feris International, Inc. dated March 10, 2008 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed March 14, 2008).

10.63		Employment Agreement between Pro Sports & Entertainment, Inc. and Paul Feller dated January 1, 2007 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed March 14, 2008).

10.67		Strategic Investment Agreement between Stratus Media Group, Inc. and ProElite, Inc. dated October 9, 2009 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed October 22, 2009).

10.68		Amendment to Strategic Investment Agreement between Stratus Media Group, Inc. and ProElite, Inc. dated January 11, 2010 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed February 26, 2010).

10.69		Employment Agreement between Stratus Media Group, Inc. and William Kelly dated February 22, 2010.

10.70		Employment Agreement between Stratus Media Group, Inc. and John Moynahan dated November 1, 2010. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.70 to the Company’s Report on Form 10-K filed on April 26, 2011).

23.1		Consent of Independent Registeed Public Accounting Firm.*

23.2		Consent of Troy Gould PC (included in Exhibit 5.1).

* Filed with this Registration Statement on Form S-1.

a6827065_ex5-1.htm

EXHIBIT 5.1

TroyGould PC

1801 Century Park East, 16th Floor

Los Angeles, California 90067

August 12, 2011

Stratus Media Group, Inc.

3 E. De La Guerra Street

Santa Barbara, California 93101

Ladies and Gentlemen:

You have requested our opinion in connection with the filing by Stratus Media Group, Ltd., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), of a Registration Statement on Form S-1 (the “Registration Statement”) with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”), including a related prospectus made part of the Registration Statement (the “Prospectus”), covering the offering by the selling stockholders identified in the Prospectus for resale of up to 21,750,000 shares (the “Conversion Shares”) of common stock, par value $0.001 per share, of the Company (“Common Stock”) issuable upon conversion of the Company’s Series E Preferred Stock and up to 37,225,000 shares (the “Warrant Shares”) of Common Stock that are issuable upon the exercise of outstanding warrants (the “Warrants”).

In connection with this opinion, we have examined and relied upon the Registration Statement and the Prospectus, the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation, as amended to date, the Company’s Bylaws, as amended to date, the forms of the Warrants and originals or copies certified to our satisfaction of such other records, documents, certificates, memoranda and other instruments as in our judgment are necessary or appropriate to enable us to render the opinion expressed below. We have assumed the genuineness and authenticity of all documents submitted to us as originals, the conformity to originals of all documents submitted to us as copies thereof and the due execution and delivery of all documents where due execution and delivery are a prerequisite to the effectiveness thereof.

The law covered by our opinion is limited to the applicable statutory provisions of the Nevada Revised Statutes of the State of Nevada (including applicable rules and regulations promulgated under the Nevada Revised Statutes and applicable reported judicial and regulatory determinations interpreting the Nevada Revised Statutes). We neither express nor imply any opinion (and we assume no responsibility) with respect to any other laws or the laws of any other jurisdiction or with respect to the application or effect of any such laws.

This opinion is provided to the Company and the Commission for their use solely in connection with the transactions contemplated by the Registration Statement and may not be used, circulated, quoted or otherwise relied upon by any other person or for any other purpose without our express written consent.

Based upon the foregoing, and in reliance thereon, we are of the opinion that (i) the Conversion Shares, when issued pursuant to a proper conversion notice are validly issued, fully paid and nonassessable, and (ii) the Warrant Shares, when issued and paid for in accordance with the terms of the Warrants, will be validly issued, fully paid and nonassessable.

We hereby consent to the filing of this opinion as an exhibit to the Registration Statement and further consent to the use of our name wherever appearing in the Registration Statement. In giving such consent, we do not thereby admit that we are within the category of persons whose consent is required under Section 7 of the Securities Act of 1933 or the rules and regulations of the Commission thereunder.

	Very truly yours,


	/s/ TROYGOULD PC

Ex. - 4

a6827065_ex23-1.htm

EXHIBIT 23.1

INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM’S CONSENT

We hereby consent to the use in this Registration Statement on Form S-1 of our report dated April 25, 2011, relating to the financial statements of Stratus Media Group, Inc. for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, which appear in such Registration Statement. We also consent to the reference to us under the heading "Experts" in such Registration Statement.

/s/ Goldman Kurland Mohidin LLP

Encino, California

August 12, 2011

Ex.-5